The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Should I Stay or Should I Go? Explaining Turnover Intentions with Organizational Identification and Job Satisfaction*
Open accessAbstract
The social identity approach is a powerful theoretical framework for the understanding of individuals' behaviour. The main argument is that individuals think and act on behalf of the group they belong to because this group membership adds to their social identity, which partly determines one's self‐esteem. In the organizational world, social identity and self‐categorization theories state that a strong organizational identification is associated with low turnover intentions. Because identification is the more general perception of shared fate between employee and organization, we propose that the relationship between identification and turnover will be mediated by job satisfaction as the more specific evaluation of one's task and working conditions. In four samples we found organizational identification feeding into job satisfaction, which in turn predicts turnover intentions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models
Sobel, M. E. (1982) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.2307/270723 · Cited by 12,810
Research works printed but not linked: 45
- 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1995.tb01765.x · DOI
- 10.2307/258189 · DOI
- 10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173 · DOI · Paper page
- Brief A. P., 1998, Attitudes In and Around Organizations
- Cascio W. F., 1982, Costing Human Resources: The Financial Aspect of Human Behavior in Organizations
- 10.1111/1467-8551.00242 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-8551.00244 · DOI
- Davies R., 2001, How to boost staff retention, People Management, 7, 54
- Eagly A., 1993, The Psychology of Attitudes
- Eagly A., 1998, The Handbook of Social Psychology, 269
- 10.1037//0021-9010.74.6.855 · DOI
- Gautam T. R.Van DickandU.Wagner(forthcoming). ‘Organizational identification and organizational commitment: Distinct aspects of two related concepts’ Asian Journal of Social Psychology.
- 10.1111/1467-8551.00243 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-8551.00245 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0149-2063(00)00043-X · DOI
- Hackman J. R., 1980, Work Redesign
- Haslam S. A., 2001, Psychology in Organizations: The Social Identity Approach
- Haslam S. A., International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology
- 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2003.00384.x · DOI · Paper page
- Haslam S. A., 2001, Groups at Work: Theory and Research, 25
- 10.1111/1467-8551.00241 · DOI
- 10.1348/096317903321208862 · DOI
- 10.2307/259266 · DOI
- Hom P. W., 1995, Employee Turnover
- 10.2307/3069441 · DOI · Paper page
- Hu L‐T., 1995, Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications, 76
- 10.2307/257015 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037//0033-2909.114.1.185 · DOI
- 10.1177/0013164492052004002 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0037335 · DOI
- 10.4135/9781452231495.n6 · DOI
- Riketta M., Journal of Vocational Behavior
- Ryan M. K., British Journal of Management
- 10.2307/256939 · DOI
- 10.2307/4134383 · DOI
- Tajfel H., 1986, Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 7
- Turner J. C., 1987, Rediscovering the Social Group
- Van Dick R., 2004, International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 171
- 10.1348/096317904774202135 · DOI · Paper page
- Van Dick R., Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
- 10.1111/1464-0597.00020 · DOI
- 10.1002/9780470696712.ch18 · DOI
- Wegge J., 2003, Social Identity at Work: Developing Theory for Organizational Practice, 43
- 10.1037//0021-9010.71.2.219 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
How bad are the effects of bad leaders? A meta-analysis of destructive leadership and its outcomes
Schyns, B., & Schilling, J. (2013) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.09.001 · Cited by 1,245
Loi, R., Chan, K. W., & Lam, L. W. (2014) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/joop.12028 · Cited by 249
Suspicion in the workplace: Organizational conspiracy theories and work‐related outcomes
Douglas, K. M., & Leite, A. C. (2017) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12212 · Cited by 132
Lin, Q., Jiang, C., & Lam, T. H. (2013) · Journal of Occupational Health · doi:10.1539/joh.12-0287-oa · Cited by 80
Simbula, S., Margheritti, S., & Avanzi, L. (2023) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs13020083 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Dick, R., Christ, O., Stellmacher, J., Wagner, U., Ahlswede, O., Grubba, C., Hauptmeier, M., Höhfeld, C., Moltzen, K., & Tissington, P. A.
- Venue
- British Journal of Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-11-25
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 351-360
- ISSN
- 1045-3172 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8551
- OpenAlex
- W3126079098
- Cited by
- 689
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 20.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Should I Stay or Should I Go? Explaining Turnover Intentions with Organizational Identification and Job Satisfaction*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2004.00424.x
- The paper
- Van Dick, R., Christ, O., Stellmacher, J., Wagner, U., Ahlswede, O., Grubba, C., Hauptmeier, M., Höhfeld, C., Moltzen, K., & Tissington, P. A. (2004). Should I Stay or Should I Go? Explaining Turnover Intentions with Organizational Identification and Job Satisfaction*. British Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2004.00424.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
