Cited by 105Child Welfare and AdoptionLanguage Development and DisordersEarly Childhood Education and Development

Effect of Foster Care on Young Children’s Language Learning

Open access
Windsor, Jennifer, Benigno, Joann P, Wing, Christine A, Carroll, Patrick J, Koga, Sebastian F, Nelson, Charles A, Fox, Nathan A, Zeanah, Charles H·2011·Child Development

Abstract

This report examines 174 young children’s language outcomes in the Bucharest Early Intervention Project, the first randomized trial of foster placement after institutional care. Age of foster placement was highly correlated with language outcomes. Placement by 15 months led to similar expressive and receptive language test scores as typical age peers at 30 and 42 months. Placement from 15 to 24 months also led to dramatic language improvement. In contrast, children placed after 24 months had the same severe language delays as children in institutional care. Language samples at 42 months confirmed that placement after 24 months led to lower expressive skill.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01604.x

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Foster care intervention in the BEIP is associated with increased language (e.g., word identification).

    “↑ Language (e.g., word identification) (Windsor et al., 2007(Windsor et al., , 2011(Windsor et al., , 2013) )”

    From Resilience following severe early life neglect: A review of longitudinal evidence from the Bucharest Early Intervention Project (2026) · cites this paper as Windsor et al., 2011

    The Discussion reports markedly improved language outcomes at 30 and 42 months for BEIP children placed in foster care by 24 months, but not for those placed later. The Methods describe object recognition and labeling tasks, while the Results report overall receptive and expressive scores; they do not establish an increase in a separately measured word-identification outcome. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Poor expressive and receptive language are consistently observed in neglected children and are more pronounced than language difficulties associated with abuse.

    “Poor expressive and receptive language have been consistently observed in neglected children, who exhibit language difficulties that are more pronounced than those associated with abuse.(87, 112, 113)”
  • Some outcomes, including language, externalizing disorders, and emotional behaviors, may not show complete catch-up and appear less amenable to intervention.

    “However, there are outcome measures that may not show complete catch-up (e.g., language, externalizing disorders, emotional behaviors) (Bos, et al., 2011; Windsor, et al., 2011) and seem less amenable to intervention.”

    From Risk and developmental heterogeneity in previously institutionalized children (2012) · cites this paper as Windsor, et al., 2011

  • Studies in this cohort have shown that although multiple areas of development are impaired among ever-institutionalized children, foster care placement leads to improvement in some areas but not in other areas, including motor function based on the results of the current study.

    “Studies in this cohort have shown that although multiple areas of development are impaired among ever-institutionalized children, foster care placement leads to improvement in some areas (e.g. cognition,2,3 attachment,5,6,40, language7–9, depression, anxiety,10,12 stereotypies,11 and growth41) but not in other areas”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 21 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bzoch KR League R Assessing language skills in infancy 1971 University Park Press Baltimore, MD
  2. Morison SJ Ames EW Chisholm K The development of children adopted from Romanian orphanages Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 1995 41 411 430

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Windsor, J., Benigno, J. P., Wing, C. A., Carroll, P. J., Koga, S. F., Nelson, C. A., Fox, N. A., & Zeanah, C. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Ohio University (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • Tulane University (US)
Corresponding author
Windsor, Jennifer
Venue
Child Development
Published
2011-07-01
Volume
82
Issue
4
Pages
1040-1046
ISSN
  • 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8624
OpenAlex
W2171717454
Cited by
105
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 6
FWCI
21.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH091363)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
Keywords
foster care, institutional care, language development, expressive language, receptive language, language delay, Bucharest Early Intervention Project, early intervention, child language outcomes
MeSH terms
Developmental Disabilities, Child, Preschool, Female, Foster Home Care, Humans, Infant, Language Development, Language Tests, Learning, Male, Romania, Speech, Treatment Outcome, Intention to Treat Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review