Cited by 1,094Creativity in Education and NeuroscienceBehavioral Health and InterventionsDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity.

Friedman, Ronald S., Förster, Jens·2001·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

This study tested whether cues associated with promotion and prevention regulatory foci influence creativity. The authors predicted that the "risky," explorative processing style elicited by promotion cues, relative to the risk-averse, perseverant processing style elicited by prevention cues, would facilitate creative thought. These predictions were supported by two experiments in which promotion cues bolstered both creative insight (Experiment 1) and creative generation (Experiment 2) relative to prevention cues. Experiments 3 and 4 provided evidence for the process account of these findings. suggesting that promotion cues, relative to prevention cues, produce a riskier response bias (Experiment 3) and bolster memory search for novel responses (Experiment 4). A final experiment provided evidence that individual differences in regulatory focus influence creative problem solving in a manner analogous to that of incidental promotion and prevention cues.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1001

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2001
Volume
81
Issue
6
Pages
1001-1013
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2043358607
Cited by
1,094
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 79 · 2015: 54 · 2014: 73 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 59
FWCI
12.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
regulatory focus, creativity, creative insight, creative generation, response bias, memory search, creative problem solving, individual differences
MeSH terms
Achievement, Creativity, Cues, Humans, Random Allocation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review