The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Socioeconomic Status Modifies the Sex Difference in Spatial Skill
Abstract
We examined whether the male spatial advantage varies across children from different socioeconomic (SES) groups. In a longitudinal study, children were administered two spatial tasks requiring mental transformations and a syntax comprehension task in the fall and spring of second and third grades. Boys from middle-and high-SES backgrounds outperformed their female counterparts on both spatial tasks, whereas boys and girls from a low-SES group did not differ in their performance level on these tasks. As expected, no sex differences were found on the verbal comprehension task. Prior studies have generally been based on the assumption that the male spatial advantage reflects ability differences in the population as a whole. Our finding that the advantage is sensitive to variations in SES provides a challenge to this assumption, and has implications for a successful explanation of the sex-related difference in spatial skill.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Heritability estimates versus large environmental effects: The IQ paradox resolved.
Dickens, W. T., & Flynn, J. R. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.2.346 · Cited by 663
Research works printed but not linked: 29
- 10.1080/00207596608247156 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/1131072 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1006/drev.1996.0009 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0160-2896(03)00061-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2466/pms.1986.62.1.159 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2096370 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1348/000712699161297 · doi:10.1348/000712699161297
- 10.1126/science.7604277 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0010-0285(02)00500-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0003-066X.36.8.892 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.139 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/1130210 · DOI
- 10.1207/s15326985ep2804_6 · DOI
- 10.7551/mitpress/6194.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- Lemke M., Sen A., Pahlke E., Partelow L., Miller D., Williams T., Kastberg D., Jocelyn L. (2004). International outcomes of learning in mathematics literacy and problem solving: PISA 2003, results from the U.S. perspective (NCES 2005-003). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. · DOI
- 10.1037/0012-1649.35.4.940 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2466/pms.1999.88.3c.1261 · DOI
- Liben L.S., 2001, Spatial schemas and abstract thought, 45, 10.7551/mitpress/6392.003.0005 · doi:10.7551/mitpress/6392.003.0005
- 10.2307/1130467 · doi:10.2307/1130467 · Paper page
- Maccoby E., Jacklin C.N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0028-3932(90)90141-A · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0033-2909.86.5.889 · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.5.889 · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0193-3973(01)00073-9 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-0663.95.3.650 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00289251 · DOI
- 10.1016/0193-3973(94)90004-3 · DOI · Paper page
- Terlecki M. (2004). The effects of long-term practice and training on mental rotation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
- Thurstone T.G., 1974, PMA Readiness Level
- 10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.250 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
The weirdest people in the world?
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0999152x · Cited by 12,641
Socioeconomic status and the brain: mechanistic insights from human and animal research
Hackman, D. A., Farah, M. J., & Meaney, M. J. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2897 · Cited by 1,409
Socioeconomic gradients predict individual differences in neurocognitive abilities.
Noble, K. G., McCandliss, B. D., & Farah, M. J. (2007) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00600.x · Cited by 1,041
Women's underrepresentation in science: sociocultural and biological considerations
Ceci, S. J., Williams, W. M., & Barnett, S. M. (2009) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0014412 · Cited by 957
Wang, M.-T., & Degol, J. (2013) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2013.08.001 · Cited by 837
Metadata
- Authors
- Levine, S. C., Vasilyeva, M., Lourenco, S. F., Newcombe, N. S., & Huttenlocher, J.
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 841-845
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2100699293
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Socioeconomic Status Modifies the Sex Difference in Spatial Skill. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01623.x
- The paper
- Levine, S. C., Vasilyeva, M., Lourenco, S. F., Newcombe, N. S., & Huttenlocher, J. (2005). Socioeconomic Status Modifies the Sex Difference in Spatial Skill. Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01623.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.