The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Misperceptions in Intergroup Conflict: Disagreeing About What We Disagree About
Open accessAbstract
Two studies examined misperceptions of disagreement in partisan social conflicts, namely, in the debates over abortion (Study 1) and politics (Study 2). We observed that partisans tend to exaggerate differences of opinion with their adversaries. Further, we found that perceptions of disagreement were more pronounced for values that were central to the perceiver's own ideology than for values that were central to the ideology of the perceiver's adversaries. To the extent that partisans assumed disagreement concerning personally important values, they were also inaccurate in perceiving their adversaries' actual opinions. Discussion focuses on the cognitive mechanisms underlying misperceptions of disagreement and strategies for reducing intergroup conflict.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Emotional egocentricity lies at the heart of much of human interpersonal (Thompson and Loewenstein, 1992) and group conflict (Chambers et al., 2006).”
From Age-related differences in function and structure of rSMG and reduced functional connectivity with DLPFC explains heightened emotional egocentricity bias in childhood (2015) · cites this paper as Chambers et al., 2006
Citations
Cites
Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098 · Cited by 4,583
The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes
Ross, L., Greene, D., & House, P. (1977) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(77)90049-x · Cited by 3,139
Perspective Taking as Egocentric Anchoring and Adjustment.
Nicholas Epley, A., Keysar, B., Leaf Van Boven, A., & Gilovich, T. D. (2004) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.327 · Cited by 1,316
Kruger, J. (1999) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.2.221 · Cited by 911
How we know--and sometimes misjudge--what others know: Imputing one's own knowledge to others.
Nickerson, R. S. (1999) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.737 · Cited by 841
Egocentric biases in availability and attribution.
Ross, M., & Sicoly, F. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.3.322 · Cited by 799
Social perception in negotiation
Thompson, L., & Hastie, R. (1990) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(90)90048-e · Cited by 671
Assimilation and contrast effects in reactions to communication and attitude change.
Hovland, C. I., Harvey, O. J., & Sherif, M. (1957) · Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0048480 · Cited by 662
Egocentric Biases in Availability and Attribution
Ross, M., & Sicoly, F. (2004) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203496398-12 · Cited by 660
Kruger, J. (1999) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.77.2.221 · Cited by 639
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Moral Roots of Environmental Attitudes
Feinberg, M., & Willer, R. (2013) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797612449177 · Cited by 928
Frenemies: How Social Media Polarizes America
Settle, J. E. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781108560573 · Cited by 377
Westfall, J., Van Boven, L., Chambers, J. R., & Judd, C. M. (2015) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691615569849 · Cited by 363
(Mis)perceptions of Partisan Polarization in the American Public
Levendusky, M. S., & Malhotra, N. (2016) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfv045 · Cited by 356
Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., & Haidt, J. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050092 · Cited by 369
Inaccurate group meta-perceptions drive negative out-group attributions in competitive contexts
Lees, J., & Cikara, M. (2019) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0766-4 · Cited by 259
Schlenker, B. R., Chambers, J. R., & Le, B. M. (2011) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2011.12.009 · Cited by 264
Polarization in the contemporary political and media landscape
Wilson, A. E., Parker, V. A., & Feinberg, M. (2020) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.07.005 · Cited by 220
Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2009) · Social and Psychological Bases of Ideology and System Justification · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195320916.003.015 · Cited by 207
Exaggerated meta-perceptions predict intergroup hostility between American political partisans
Moore-Berg, S. L., Ankori-Karlinsky, L.-O., Hameiri, B., & Bruneau, E. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2001263117 · Cited by 281
Van Boven, L., Judd, C. M., & Sherman, D. K. (2012) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0028145 · Cited by 159
Why Do I Hate Thee? Conflict Misperceptions and Intergroup Mistrust
Chambers, J. R., & Melnyk, D. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167206289979 · Cited by 144
Pigeonholing Partisans: Stereotypes of Party Supporters and Partisan Polarization
Rothschild, J. E., Howat, A. J., Shafranek, R. M., & Busby, E. C. (2018) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-018-9457-5 · Cited by 149
Social Conflict: The Emergence and Consequences of Struggle and Negotiation
Dreu, C. K. W. D. (2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002027 · Cited by 144
Bursztyn, L., & Yang, D. Y. (2022) · Annual Review of Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-051520-023322 · Cited by 117
Dreu, C. K. W. D., & Gross, J. (2018) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x18002170 · Cited by 121
The Preference for Belief Consonance
Golman, R., Loewenstein, G. F., Moene, K. O., & Zarri, L. (2016) · The Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.30.3.165 · Cited by 111
The Political Domain Appears Simpler to the Politically Extreme Than to Political Moderates
Lammers, J., Koch, A. S., Conway, P. J., & Brandt, M. J. (2016) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550616678456 · Cited by 92
False polarization: Cognitive mechanisms and potential solutions
Fernbach, P. M., & Van Boven, L. (2022) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.06.005 · Cited by 107
Socio-Psychological Barriers to Confl ict Resolution
Bar‐Tal, D. (2011) · doi:10.4324/9780203834091-16 · Cited by 85
Steinbeis, N., Bernhardt, B. C., & Singer, T. (2015) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsu057 · Cited by 79
Homogeneity of personal values and personality traits in Facebook social networks
Lönnqvist, J., & Itkonen, J. V. A. (2015) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2015.11.001 · Cited by 72
Oishi, S., Krochik, M., & Akimoto, S. A. (2010) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00264.x · Cited by 67
The Perception Gap: How False Impressions are Pulling Americans Apart
Yudkin, D. A., Hawkins, S., & Dixon, T. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/r3h5q · Cited by 64
People See Political Opponents as More Stupid Than Evil
Hartman, R., Hester, N., & Gray, K. J. (2022) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672221089451 · Cited by 66
Cole, J. C., Gillis, A. J., van der Linden, S., Cohen, M. A., & Vandenbergh, M. P. (2025) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916231186409 · Cited by 61
Frenemies: How Social Media Polarizes America
Settle, J. E. (2018) · Cited by 56
The Liking-Similarity Effect: Perceptions of Similarity as a Function of Liking
Collisson, B., & Howell, J. L. (2014) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.2014.914882 · Cited by 60
Compassionate Democrats and Tough Republicans: How Ideology Shapes Partisan Stereotypes
Clifford, S. (2019) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-019-09542-z · Cited by 59
How Do U.S. Christians and Atheists Stereotype One Another’s Moral Values?
Simpson, A., & Morrison, K. R. (2016) · International Journal for the Psychology of Religion · doi:10.1080/10508619.2016.1167419 · Cited by 53
Planet of the Durkheimians, Where Community, Authority, and Sacredness are Foundations of MoralityPreprint
Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2007) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.980844 · Cited by 52
Busby, E. C., Howat, A. J., Rothschild, J. E., & Shafranek, R. M. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009086462 · Cited by 48
Bruchmann, K., Koopmann‐Holm, B., & Scherer, A. M. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0202101 · Cited by 47
Can friendships be bipartisan? The effects of political ideology on peer relationships
Poteat, V. P., Mereish, E. H., Liu, M. L., & Nam, J. S. (2011) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430211401048 · Cited by 43
Perceiving Intergroup Conflict: From Game Models to Mental Templates
Halevy, N., Sagiv, L., Roccas, S., & Bornstein, G. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167206291947 · Cited by 41
Egocentrism drives misunderstanding in conflict and negotiation
Chambers, J. R., & Dreu, C. K. W. D. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.11.001 · Cited by 38
Projecting my envy onto you: Neurocognitive mechanisms of an offline emotional egocentricity bias
Steinbeis, N., & Singer, T. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.08.007 · Cited by 40
A Below‐Average Effect with Respect to A merican Political Stereotypes on Warmth and Competence
Eriksson, K., & Funcke, A. (2013) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12093 · Cited by 33
Blatz, C. W., & Mercier, B. (2018) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550617712034 · Cited by 33
Awe, ideological conviction, and perceptions of ideological opponents.
Stancato, D. M., & Keltner, D. J. (2019) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/emo0000665 · Cited by 35
When Polarization Triggers Out-Group “Counter-Projection” Across the Political Divide
Denning, K. R., & Hodges, S. D. (2021) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672211021211 · Cited by 24
Ideological Bias in Social Psychological Research
Jussim, L. J., Crawford, J. T., Anglin, S. M., & Stevens, S. T. (2015) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315717104-12 · Cited by 29
Bursztyn, L., & Yang, D. (2021) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w29168 · Cited by 30
Opposing Abortion, Gay Adoption, Euthanasia, and Suicide
Deak, C., & Saroglou, V. (2015) · Archive for the Psychology of Religion · doi:10.1163/15736121-12341309 · Cited by 27
An Ideological House of Mirrors
Scherer, A. M., Windschitl, P. D., & Graham, J. (2014) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550614549385 · Cited by 27
Improving Relations Between Residents and Immigrants
Stephan, W. G. (2011) · Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy · doi:10.1111/j.1530-2415.2011.01252.x · Cited by 27
The conflict mindset: How internal conflicts affect self‐regulation
Kleiman, T., & Enisman, M. (2018) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12387 · Cited by 34
Illusory interparty disagreement: Partisans agree on what hate speech to censor but do not know it
Solomon, B. C., Hall, M. E. K., Hemmen, A., & Druckman, J. N. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2402428121 · Cited by 29
Psychological and Communication Processes Associated With Intergroup Conflict Resolution
Stephan, W. G. (2008) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496407313413 · Cited by 24
Does “humanization” of the preborn explain why conservatives (vs. liberals) oppose abortion?
MacInnis, C. C., MacLean, M. H., & Hodson, G. (2013) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.11.009 · Cited by 23
Can citizens guess how other citizens voted based on demographic characteristics?
Titelman, N., & Lauderdale, B. E. (2021) · Political Science Research and Methods · doi:10.1017/psrm.2021.53 · Cited by 22
Saguy, T., & Kteily, N. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611412388 · Cited by 22
Unasked questions about stereotype accuracy.
Jussim, L. J., Stevens, S. T., & Honeycutt, N. (2018) · Archives of Scientific Psychology · doi:10.1037/arc0000055 · Cited by 26
Stereotypes about compassion across the political spectrum.
Scheffer, J. A., Cameron, C. D., McKee, S. E., Hadjiandreou, E., & Scherer, A. M. (2020) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/emo0000820 · Cited by 20
Individuals prefer to harm their own group rather than help an opposing group
Gershon, R., & Fridman, A. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2215633119 · Cited by 19
Alteration of Political Belief by Non-invasive Brain Stimulation
Chawke, C., & Kanai, R. (2016) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00621 · Cited by 20
Predictors of Psychological Outcomes in Nonheterosexual Individuals
Sanders, E. K., & Chalk, H. M. (2016) · Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research · doi:10.24839/2164-8204.jn21.2.100 · Cited by 21
Poteat, V. P., & Mereish, E. H. (2012) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973533.2011.637852 · Cited by 19
Malleable liberals and fixed conservatives? Political orientation shapes perceived ability to change
Lassetter, B., & Neel, R. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2019.01.002 · Cited by 18
Stern, C., & Kleiman, T. (2015) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550615596209 · Cited by 20
Rye, B., & Underhill, A. (2019) · Women's Reproductive Health · doi:10.1080/23293691.2018.1556425 · Cited by 14
Bias Perception and the Spiral of Conflict
Kennedy, K. A., & Pronin, E. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199737512.003.0017 · Cited by 18
Conflict misperceptions between citizens and foreigners across the globe
Romano, A., Gross, J., & Dreu, C. K. W. D. (2022) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac267 · Cited by 17
Responding to Interpersonal Political Disagreement
Hopmann, D. N., Bjarnøe, C., & Wonneberger, A. (2019) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edz011 · Cited by 16
Should You Stay Away from Strangers?
Busby, E. C. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108957885 · Cited by 14
Simulation: A strategy for mindreading similar but not dissimilar others?
Woo, B. M., & Mitchell, J. P. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104000 · Cited by 13
Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., & Haidt, J. (2011) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2027266 · Cited by 12
Attitude Extremity and Party Identification Strength on Perceived Polarization
Matsuno, E. G. (2013) · CU Scholar (University of Colorado Boulder) · Cited by 11
Chapter 4 Games Groups Play: Mental Models in Intergroup Conflict and Negotiation
Halevy, N., Chou, E. Y., & Murnighan, J. K. (2011) · Research on managing groups and teams · doi:10.1108/s1534-0856(2011)0000014007 · Cited by 10
Meta-perception and misinformation
Bogart, S. M., & Lees, J. M. (2023) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101717 · Cited by 11
Jordan, M. M., & Whitmer, J. M. (2023) · Sociological Perspectives · doi:10.1177/07311214231181383 · Cited by 8
Susmann, M. W., Dixon, G., Bushman, B. J., & Garrett, R. K. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0268601 · Cited by 8
Culture wars, perception gap and affective polarization: an approach from the Spanish case
Rojo Martínez, J. M., Crespo Martínez, I., & Mora Rodríguez, A. (2023) · OBETS. Revista de Ciencias Sociales · doi:10.14198/obets.21976 · Cited by 7
Selection Neglect and Political Beliefs
Brundage, M., Little, A. T., & You, S. (2022) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/p49at · Cited by 7
Building Political Discourse Skills: Students as Teachers
Garcia, L. C., & Ulbig, S. (2023) · Journal of Political Science Education · doi:10.1080/15512169.2023.2267150 · Cited by 7
Klein, N. (2015) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973533.2015.1111213 · Cited by 8
The Politics of Abortion, Pregnancy, and Motherhood
Sutton, R. M., Murphy, A. O., Petterson, A., & Douglas, K. M. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108779104.019 · Cited by 7
AN INTEGRATIVE SOLUTION TO THE CONFLICT OVER CONFLICT.
Mannes, A. E. (2008) · Academy of Management Proceedings · doi:10.5465/ambpp.2008.33622599 · Cited by 8
Polarization in the Contemporary Political and Media LandscapePreprint
Wilson, A. E., Parker, V., & Feinberg, M. (2020) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/yqvzc · Cited by 15
Perceiving race relevance in everyday events: Target race matters, perceiver race does not
Betz, D. E., Ramsey, L. R., & Sekaquaptewa, D. (2013) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430212474077 · Cited by 6
Cultural Competence: A Form of Stereotype Rationality
Stevens, S. T., Jussim, L. J., Stevens, L. A., & Anglin, S. M. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-78997-2_26 · Cited by 6
Glasford, D. E. (2022) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12896 · Cited by 7
Making Enemies: Reactive Dynamics of Discursive Polarization
Backström, J., Creutz, K., & Pyrhönen, N. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-89066-7_6 · Cited by 6
Polarization in the contemporary political and media landscapePreprint
Wilson, A. E., Parker, V., & Feinberg, M. (2020) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/ebp3z · Cited by 8
The straw man effect: Partisan misrepresentation in natural language
Yeomans, M. (2021) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/13684302211014582 · Cited by 5
National Security Challenges: Insights from Social, Neurobiological, and Complexity Sciences
Ehlschlaeger, C., Astorino‐Courtois, A., Cabayan, H., Casebeer, B., Chapman, A. J. C., DiEuliis, D., Lyle, D. W. R., Rice, C., Adelman, J. R., Amir-Ghessemi, A., et al. (2012) · Cited by 5
Conflict Over Conspiracy Theories: Face‐Work, Epistemic Identity, and the Structure of Interactions
Whitmer, J. M., & Jordan, M. M. (2023) · Symbolic Interaction · doi:10.1002/symb.673 · Cited by 5
Tartaglione, J., & de‐Wit, L. (2024) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12787 · Cited by 7
The Effects of Empathy on Disparagement Humor
Bui, P., Kalpidou, M., DeVito, L., & Greene, T. (2016) · Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research · doi:10.24839/2164-8204.jn21.2.119 · Cited by 5
Levendusky, M. S., & Malhotra, N. A. (2013) · Cited by 5
Jussim, L. J., Crawford, J. T., Stevens, S. T., & Anglin, S. M. (2016) · Cited by 5
The Politics of Intergroup Attitudes
(2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108779104.012 · Cited by 5
Confronting the intractable: An evaluation of the Seeds of Peace experience
Schleien, S. M. (2007) · UWSpace (University of Waterloo) · Cited by 5
Relationship Between Physical Activity and Cognition in Adults With and Without Alzheimer's Disease
Sprague, B. N., Watts, A. S., & Burns, J. M. (2016) · Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research · doi:10.24839/2164-8204.jn21.2.91 · Cited by 4
You’re red, I’m blue, so I don’t like you: the political dis similarity- dis liking effect
Bruchmann, K., Baker, S., Adisu, M., & Zasso, S. A. (2023) · Politics Groups and Identities · doi:10.1080/21565503.2023.2224760 · Cited by 4
Examining the Frequency and Characteristics of Politically Diverse Friendships
Bahns, A. J. (2025) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/19485506251349880 · Cited by 4
Young Adults' Expectations About the Values of Religious and Spiritual People
Kobza, M., & Salter, N. P. (2016) · Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research · doi:10.24839/2164-8204.jn21.2.70 · Cited by 4
Oppositional Projection in Perceived Support for Cap and TradePreprint
Gromet, D. M., & Leaf Van Boven, A. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2434271 · Cited by 4
How to Quantify Polarization in Models of Opinion DynamicsPreprint
Musco, C., Ramesh, I., Ugander, J. H., & Witter, R. T. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.11981 · Cited by 13
Countering Political Polarization Through Conscious and Unconscious Integrative Complexity
Kam, C., & Bellehumeur, C. (2024) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973533.2024.2413486 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Chambers, J. R., Baron, R. S., & Inman, M. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Florida (US)
- University of Iowa (US)
- Hope College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Chambers, John R.
- ORCID
- Inman, Mary L.
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 38-45
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2143730034
- Cited by
- 155
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 9.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- autopapers.ssrn.com
- Locations
- Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Hope College Digital Commons (Hope College) (submittedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Conflict Management and Negotiation
- Keywords
- intergroup conflict, partisanship, ideological polarization, abortion debate, political conflict, cognitive mechanisms, conflict mitigation
- MeSH terms
- Abortion, Legal, Adult, Attitude, Conflict, Psychological, Female, Humans, Male, Politics, Set, Psychology, Social Identification, Social Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review