Cited by 331Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsBehavioral Health and InterventionsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Toward a Physiology of Dual-Process Reasoning and Judgment: Lemonade, Willpower, and Expensive Rule-Based Analysis

Masicampo, E.J., Baumeister, Roy F.·2008·Psychological Science

Abstract

This experiment used the attraction effect to test the hypothesis that ingestion of sugar can reduce reliance on intuitive, heuristic-based decision making. In the attraction effect, a difficult choice between two options is swayed by the presence of a seemingly irrelevant “decoy” option. We replicated this effect and the finding that the effect increases when people have depleted their mental resources performing a previous self-control task. Our hypothesis was based on the assumption that effortful processes require and consume relatively large amounts of glucose (brain fuel), and that this use of glucose is why people use heuristic strategies after exerting self-control. Before performing any tasks, some participants drank lemonade sweetened with sugar, which restores blood glucose, whereas others drank lemonade containing a sugar substitute. Only lemonade with sugar reduced the attraction effect. These results show one way in which the body (blood glucose) interacts with the mind (self-control and reliance on heuristics).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02077.x

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1252 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 331

Metadata

Authors
Masicampo, E. J., & Baumeister, R. F.
Affiliations
Florida State University (US)
Corresponding author
Masicampo, E.J.
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2008-03
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
255-260
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2168592337
Cited by
331
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 28
FWCI
10.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
attraction effect, decoy effect, self-control, blood glucose, sugar consumption, heuristic decision making, intuitive judgment, rule-based analysis
MeSH terms
Adult, Association, Attention, Beverages, Blood Glucose, Brain, Physical Exertion, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Interpersonal Relations, Judgment, Logic, Male, Motivation, Problem Solving, Set, Psychology, Intuition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review