Cited by 1,487Behavioral Health and InterventionsDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Impulse and Self-Control From a Dual-Systems Perspective

Hofmann, Wilhelm, Friese, Malte, Strack, Fritz·2009·Perspectives on Psychological Science

Abstract

Though human beings embody a unique ability for planned behavior, they also often act impulsively. This insight may be important for the study of self-control situations in which people are torn between their long-term goals to restrain behavior and their immediate impulses that promise hedonic fulfillment. In the present article, we outline a dual-systems perspective of impulse and self-control and suggest a framework for the prediction of self-control outcomes. This framework combines three elements that, considered jointly, may enable a more precise prediction of self-control outcomes than they do when studied in isolation: impulsive precursors of behavior, reflective precursors, and situational or dispositional boundary conditions. The theoretical and practical utility of such an approach is demonstrated by drawing on recent evidence from several domains of self-control such as eating, drinking, and sexual behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01116.x

Cites

144 of 144 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hofmann, W., Friese, M., & Strack, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Würzburg (DE)
  • University of Basel (CH)
Corresponding author
Hofmann, Wilhelm
Venue
Perspectives on Psychological Science
Published
2009-03
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
162-176
ISSN
  • 1745-6916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-6924
OpenAlex
W1977835193
Cited by
1,487
References
144
Citations by year
2026: 108 · 2025: 107 · 2024: 117 · 2023: 103 · 2022: 86 · 2021: 116 · 2020: 140 · 2019: 127 · 2018: 94 · 2017: 98 · 2016: 73 · 2015: 85 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 54 · 2012: 45
FWCI
46.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
impulse control, self-control, dual-system theory, impulsivity, theory of planned behavior, long-term goals, hedonic motivation, boundary conditions, dietary habits, drinking behavior, sexual behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review