Cited by 220Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAttachment and Relationship DynamicsFamily Dynamics and Relationships

Marital Conflict, Child Emotional Security about Family Relationships and Child Adjustment

Open access
Harold, Gordon T., Shelton, Katherine H., Goeke‐Morey, Marcie C., Cummings, E. Mark·2004·Social Development

Abstract

Addressing a gap in process‐oriented understanding of relations between marital conflict and children's adjustment, propositions of the emotional security hypothesis from a family‐wide perspective were tested in a longitudinal research design. Participants were 181 families and their 11–12 year‐old‐child (115 boys, 76 girls) living in Wales, in the United Kingdom. Relations between marital conflict, children's emotional security about marital conflict and parenting, respectively, and children's adjustment were assessed based on reports by mothers, fathers, and children and videotaped analogue procedures completed by children. Structural equation modelling indicated that children's emotional security about interparental conflict (emotional regulation, cognitive representations and behavioural regulation) mediated the relation between marital conflict and children's security about parenting. Processes pertaining to children's security in multiple family systems (i.e., interparental and parent–child) provided an indirect mechanism through which interparental conflict affected children's symptoms of psychological distress (internalising and externalising problems) assessed 12 months later. Future directions for further tests of comprehensive, theoretically based models for the effects of marital conflict on children are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2004.00272.x

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Emotional and behavioral dysregulation has been linked to insecure attachment and to insecurity about interparental conflict, with prospective associations to externalizing and internalizing symptoms.

    “Problems in emotional and behavioral dyregulation have been linked both with insecure attachment (Esbjorn, Bender, Reinholdt-Dunne, Munck, & Ollendick, 2012) and insecurity about interparental conflict, including demonstrations of effects on emotional and behavioral responses linked prospectively to externalizing and internalizing symptoms (e.g., Davies et al., 2002; Harold, Shelton, Goeke-Morey &”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harold, G. T., Shelton, K. H., Goeke‐Morey, M. C., & Cummings, E. M.
Affiliations
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • University of Notre Dame (US)
Corresponding author
Harold, Gordon T.
Venue
Social Development
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-07-20
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
350-376
ISSN
  • 0961-205X (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9507
OpenAlex
W2158564292
Cited by
220
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 14
FWCI
7.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Development (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • British Academy
  • Economic and Social Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
Keywords
marital conflict, parental conflict, child adjustment, emotion regulation, mental representation, behavioral regulation, parenting, internalizing problems, externalizing problems, family relationships

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review