The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conspiracy theories: Causes and cures
Open accessAbstract
Many millions of people hold conspiracy theories; they believe that powerful people have worked together in order to withhold the truth about some important practice or some terrible event. A recent example is the belief, widespread in some parts of the world, that the attacks of 9/11 were carried out not by Al Qaeda, but by Israel or the United States. Those who subscribe to conspiracy theories may create serious risks, including risks of violence, and the existence of such theories raises significant challenges for policy and law. The first challenge is to understand the mechanisms by which conspiracy theories prosper; the second challenge is to understand how such theories might be undermined. Such theories typically spread as a result of identifiable cognitive blunders, operating in conjunction with informational and reputational influences. A distinctive feature of conspiracy theories is their self-sealing quality. Conspiracy theorists are not likely to be persuaded by an attempt to dispel their theories; they may even characterize that very attempt as further proof of the conspiracy. Because those who hold conspiracy theories typically suffer from a crippled epistemology, in accordance with which it is rational to hold such theories, the best response consists in cognitive infiltration of extremist groups. Various policy dilemmas, such as the question whether it is better for government to rebut conspiracy theories or to ignore them, are explored in this light.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Similarly, different strategies for successful intervention may apply for people who hold strong anti-vaccine conspiracy beliefs than those who do not hold strong beliefs [44].”
From The Effects of Anti-Vaccine Conspiracy Theories on Vaccination Intentions (2014) · cites this paper as [44]
In the citing paper
“Conspiracist ideation is also typically immune to falsification because contradictory evidence (e.g., climate scientists being exonerated of accusations) can be accommodated by broadening the scope of the conspiracy (exonerations are a whitewash), often with considerable creativity [32].”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [32]
In the citing paper
“evidence against conspiracy theories is often construed as evidence for them, because the evidence is interpreted as arising from the conspiracy in question”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [32]
In the citing paper
“These general and robust findings help identify communicative means by which the motivated reasoning can be attenuated or circumvented [5], [32], [38], [50].”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [32]
Citations
Cites
Conspiracy Theories and the Conventional Wisdom
Pigden, C. (2007) · Episteme · doi:10.3366/epi.2007.4.2.219 · Cited by 86
Conspiracy Theories and the Internet: Controlled Demolition and Arrested Development
Clarke, S. (2007) · Episteme · doi:10.3366/epi.2007.4.2.167 · Cited by 67
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–999 of 999
Hayward, T. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198842767.002.0006
Sociopolitical Genealogy of Populist Conspiracy Theories in the Context of Hyperpolitics
Esposito, A. (2024) · Genealogy · doi:10.3390/genealogy8020066
“From the epistemological point of view, the “self-sealing” quality is the distinctive element of C.T. whereby any element that can refute a conspiracy hypothesis is, by its proponents, converted into favourable evidence (Sunstein and Vermeule 2009) 2 .”
BackgroundFox, J., & Topor, L. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197580349.002.0003
Multivariate Analyses and Technical Details
Fox, J., & Topor, L. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197580349.005.0001
Fox, J., Topor, L., & Topor, L. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197580349.002.0005
Kelley-Romano, S. (2024) · Routledge Open Research · doi:10.12688/routledgeopenres.17985.1
CARAVANA "LUAR DO SERTÃO": UNINDO POLOS DO MNPEF PARA O ENSINO DE FISICA E ASTRONOMIA NO NORDESTE
Scarano, S., Santos, C., Maia, A. F., Amôres, E. B., Nascimento, E. M., Sales, F. H. S., Júnior, F. A. P. A., Rêgo, H. H. A., da Nóbrega, M. L., FIGUEREDO, M. L. I., et al. (2022) · Revista do Professor de Física · doi:10.26512/rpf.v1i1.46014
Betzler, M. (2024) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110788341-005
Don’t Look Up as Philosophy: Comets, Climate Change, and Why the Snacks Are Not Free
Lay, C., & Johnson, D. K. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-24685-2_112
Cormick, C., & Edelsztein, V. C. (2024) · Principia an international journal of epistemology · doi:10.5007/1808-1711.2024.e93904
“Moreover, Sunstein and Vermeule (2009) point out that “direct attempts to dispel the theory can usually be folded into the theory itself, as just one more ploy by powerful conspiracy members” (p.9).”
BackgroundBadura-Brzoza, K., Główczyński, P., Dębski, P. G., & Brzoza, Z. (2024) · International Journal of Clinical Practice · doi:10.1155/2024/7449501
Werner, T. (2024) · Argumentation in context · doi:10.1075/aic.22.12wer
Zagarella, R. M., & Annoni, M. (2024) · Argumentation et analyse du discours · doi:10.4000/12hvp
Zagarella, R. M., & Annoni, M. (2024) · Argumentation et analyse du discours · doi:10.4000/12hvo
Introduction : Les théories du complot aujourd’hui : quelles solutions pour quels problèmes ?
Danblon, E., & de Donceel, L. D. (2024) · Argumentation et analyse du discours · doi:10.4000/12hvb
Introduction: Conspiracy Theories Today: What Problems, what Solutions?
Danblon, E., & de Donceel, L. D. (2024) · Argumentation et analyse du discours · doi:10.4000/12hvc
Narrating Against Uncertainty: Newspaper Documentation in the Syrian Revolutionary Movement
Chevée, A. (2024) · Political Studies · doi:10.1177/00323217241285359
From Folklore to Conspiracy Beliefs: A Gramscian Approach to Conspiracy Theory Studies
Pozzoni, M. C., & Quattromini, G. (2024) · Genealogy · doi:10.3390/genealogy8040145
Xu, H., Miro, C. J., Kim, E., & Myers, M. D. (2024) · International Communication Gazette · doi:10.1177/17480485241305316
“Conspiracy theories are fabricated explanations that attribute the responsibility of a real event to the secret doings of powerful actors (Miller et al., 2016; Vermeule and Sunstein, 2009).”
Killian, J. (2024) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2024.2446238
Regional Regulatory Approach to Disinformation: Europe
Ronald J. Krotoszynski, Jr., Koltay, A., & Garden, C. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009373272.009
anon, M., & Yasseri, T. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5030603
Rumours From the Perspective of Malaysia Retail Investors: A Qualitative Study
Thed, Z. T. S. (2024) · The Malaysian Journal of Qualitative Research · doi:10.61211/mjqr100208
Tam, L., & Kim, S. (2025) · Public Relations Review · doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2025.102543
Wojtasik, W., & Šteger, T. (2024) · Politics in Central Europe · doi:10.2478/pce-2024-0025
Malaise and crisis in the algorithmic civilisation
Borowski, A. (2025) · International Review of Applied Economics · doi:10.1080/02692171.2025.2468638
“Cass Sunstein and Adrian Vermeule, ‘Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures’ (Sunstein and Vermeule 2009).”
THE PUBLIC TRUST APPROACH TO POLITICAL CONSPIRACY THEORIES
Pimenta, T. L. (2024) · Lua Nova Revista de Cultura e Política · doi:10.1590/0102-123036tl/123
Brown, C., Luzmore, R., & Wang, Y. (2025) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-5623126/v1
Farias, D. B. L. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197762097.013.0040
Rawlsian Public Reason and Political Vice
Boettcher, J. W. (2025) · The Review of Politics · doi:10.1017/s003467052500004x
Epistemic Distance and Antidemocratic Conspiracy Theories
Caon, M. (2025) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2025.2480272
Lietz, A. (2025) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.13098
Ma, M., Han, F. L., & Wang, C. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-04350-1 · Cited by 2
“Conspiracy Theory (CT) can be de fi ned as the endeavor to interpret speci fi c events or practices through the prism of covert operations conducted by in fl uential individuals, who strive to mask their involvement until their objectives are realized (Dou-glas et al., 2019; Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009).”
Big Blocks and Blind Spots: Power, Knowledge, and Epistemic Democracy in The West Wing
Ball, C. (2025) · Open Screens · doi:10.16995/os.17493
Tsang, S. J., & Dong-Bei, L. I. (2025) · Asian Journal of Communication · doi:10.1080/01292986.2025.2515056
“These stories often suggest that powerful entities or individuals hide their true motives, engaging in secretive operations out of public view (Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009; Uscinski & Parent, 2014).”
Ngueutsa, R., Messanga, G. A., Boua, M., Tchagneno, C. L. G., Kubiszewski, V., Étoundi, J.-C., Wassouo, E., & Lheureux, F. (2025) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/y576u_v1
Stockemer, D., & Bordeleau, J. (2025) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/ssqu.70050
Navarra, P. L., Ferrer-Sapena, A., Sánchez-Pérez, E. A., et al. (2025) · Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico · doi:10.5209/emp.100391
Jarašiūnaitė–Fedosejeva, G. (2025) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101642 · Cited by 1
Defining Conspiracy Theory and Related Terms
Uscinski, J. E. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780197760222.003.0008 · Cited by 1
Extreme Beliefs and Echo Chambers
Malcolm, F., & Ranalli, C. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197760222.003.0017
Extreme Beliefs as Unshakable Identity Beliefs
Bortolotti, L. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197760222.003.0002
Tackling misinformation: where do educationalists need to target their efforts?
Brown, C., Wang, Y., & Luzmore, R. (2025) · Research Papers in Education · doi:10.1080/02671522.2025.2528739
“…model and concepts such as of crippled epistemology , which explains how, without access to diverse, credible sources, people may rationally adopt false beliefs within their own cognitive framework, deepening distrust in institutional knowledge (Kerwer and Rosman 2018; Sunstein and Vermeule 2009).”
Conspiracy Theory Theory: A Disordered Nomological NetworkPreprint
Buckingham, R. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5365150
Do Conspiracy Theories Undermine Support for Democracy? Experimental Evidence from BrazilPreprint
Amaral, M., Borba, L., Lessa, E., Lira, V., & Pavão, N. D. C. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5352897
Uscinski, J. E. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.002.0005
Uscinski, J. E. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.002.0003
The Dark Side of Time: Temporal Distortion, Power, and the Dark Tetrad in Coercive EnvironmentsPreprint
Ward, R. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5355549
Johnson, T. J., Kaye, B. K., & Park, C. S. (2025) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10776990251360688
“The more strongly respondents rely on broadcast television, newspapers, and CNN, the less likely they are to believe conspiracy theories, a finding in line with Sunstein and Vermeule (2009).”
Coronavirus: las 7 características del pensamiento conspirativo
Cook, J., Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., & van der Linden, S. (2020) · doi:10.64628/aai.njdxqcdny
Do conspiracy-theory interventions rest on a mistake?
Colyvan, M., Smartt, T., & Tierney, H. (2025) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-025-05257-3
“23 In early work along these lines, Sunstein and Vermeule ( 2009 ), while appreciating the difficulties of containment strategies, suggest how specific government interventions may help in reducing the spread of misinformation.”
Salvi, C., Mielicki, M. K., Cancer, A., Iannello, P., & George, T. (2025) · Open Mind · doi:10.1162/opmi.a.20
“Some researchers suggest that the “ crippled epistemology ” characteristic of political polarization is also present in conspiracy beliefs (Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009; Swami & Furnham, 2014), potentially due to a highly structured thinking style aimed at making sense of societal events (Fernbach et…”
Andrade, G. E. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-024-2252-8_105
Towards Designing Social Interventions for Online Climate Change Denialism Discussions
Zhong, R., Phadke, S., Goldberg, B., & Mitra, T. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3757432 · Cited by 2
“Prior works have also suggested that “emotional selection” influences how people consume content [84].”
Lu, Y., Tarannum, N., & Ha, L. S. (2025) · The Social Science Journal · doi:10.1080/03623319.2025.2576026
“Likeminded discussion is likely to increase beliefs in foreign interference because conspiracy theories are usually shared within rather isolated and likeminded networks in which high amounts of one-sided conspiratorial content is shared between individuals (Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009).”
Towards “Communities of Understanding”: a framework for controversy in schools
Bezalel, G. Y., & Fraser‐Andrews, C. (2025) · Pastoral Care in Education · doi:10.1080/02643944.2025.2578257
The Utility of Conspiracy Theories in Crises: Choosing a New Reality
Coombs, W. T. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-01693-5_5 · Cited by 1
Cleveland, M., & Papadopoulos, N. G. (2025) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s1548-643520250000022005
Želinský, D. (2025) · Acta Sociologica · doi:10.1177/00016993251400981
de Novaes, A. M., & de Novaes, D. M. (2025) · Genealogy · doi:10.3390/genealogy9040149
“In extreme cases, conspiracy theories are “particu-larly immune to challenge” and “invulnerable to contrary evidence” (Sunstein and Vermeule 2009, pp. 3, 20).”
Christoph, S., Hidalgo, O., Yendell, A., & Schweitzer, M. C. (2025) · Open Research Europe · doi:10.12688/openreseurope.21967.1
“Am I My Fellow Citizens’ Keeper?” Distrust, Democratic Backsliding, and Conspiracy Theories
Dumitru, A. C. (2025) · Constellations · doi:10.1111/1467-8675.70030
Dimensionalität und psychologische Korrelate des Glaubens an Verschwörungstheorien
Gumhalter, N. (2012) · University of Vienna · doi:10.25365/thesis.21046
The anatomy of conspiratorial infodemic: exploring super-spreaders in COVID-19 discourse on Twitter
Shao, C., & Kwon, K. H. (2025) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-025-02495-y
The Post-Factual Conspiracy Theories
(2024) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/979-8-88730-661-220251004
Gibt es mündige Verschwörungstheoretiker*innen? Über Kritik und ihre Verfallsformen
Drerup, J. (2026) · Bürgerbewusstsein · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-50019-1_5
Suerdem, A. K., Zdravkov, S., & Ivanov, M. J. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.01.16.699843
The Extreme Actor’s Perspective, and Why It Matters for Explanation
Kloosterboer, N., & Harambam, J. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780197768914.003.0004
Verschwörungsmythen und populistische Wahlerfolge – wie die Politik reagieren kann
Apolte, T., & Gerling, L. (2026) · Wirtschaftsdienst · doi:10.2478/wd-2026-0007
“Je nach Variante stellt man sich hierzu unter an-derem politische Eliten, Bildungs-oder Wissenschafts-eliten, die Medien oder gar den gesamten Staatsapparat („deep state“) als homogene Verschwörungsgruppen vor (Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009).”
Conspiracy Beliefs and Cognitive Resilience in the Baltic States
Bērziņš, J. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-10146-4_12
Zöllner, O. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-96790-0_6
Manis, K., Poudyal, B., & Wilde, P. (2026) · Rhetoric Review · doi:10.1080/07350198.2025.2604368
Conspiracist Collages: a Multimodal LLM-Based Analysis of Discursive Strategies On Telegram
Steffen, E. (2026) · Datenbank-Spektrum · doi:10.1007/s13222-026-00530-2
Should we merely become editors? A democratic argument for promoting epistemic cooperation
Zamora, J. S. (2026) · Contemporary Political Theory · doi:10.1057/s41296-026-00794-z
“More concretely, they focus on promoting citizens’ ability to build their own judgements in a critical way and to discriminate reliable from unreliable sources of information (Cassam, 2019; D’Ancona, 2017; McIntyre, 2018; Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009).”
Kuti, C. (2025) · Symbolon · doi:10.46522/s.2025.02.7
Knowing better: conspiratorial wellness, national bodies, and global plots in Turkish popular media
Karaosmanoğlu, K. (2026) · Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies · doi:10.1080/14683857.2026.2632614
Do Conspiracy Theories Undermine Support for Democracy?
Amaral, M., Borba, L., Lira, V., Lessa, E., & Pavão, N. D. C. (2026) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-026-10130-1
Gao, L., & Strömbäck, J. (2026) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051261429392
“While linguistically similar, CTs do not necessarily equal theories about conspiracies , since a defining feature of CTs is that they are typically monologi-cal (Goertzel, 1994) and, in contrast to proper theories, highly resistant to evidence (Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009).”
Maeyer, J. D., Séjourné, C., & Champagne, C. (2026) · Journal for Cultural Research · doi:10.1080/14797585.2026.2643821
“In this context, some argue that conspiracy theories demonstrate a ‘crippled epistemology’ (Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009), that is, a flawed form of knowledge based on limited or irrelevant information.”
Campisi, F. C., & Fortin, F. (2026) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103296 · Cited by 1
How to Be a Meta-Conspiracy Theorist
Stamatiadis‐Bréhier, A. (2026) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2026.2625252
Rofiqi, R., Fikri, I. F., & Sugianto, H. (2026) · Argumentation and Advocacy · doi:10.1080/10511431.2026.2646003
Comment on raisonne sur les explications : philosophie et psychologie du raisonnement explicatif
Mirabile, P. (2020) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/daef9c74z4dd4z4152za292zeb013ca8b625
Conspiracy beliefs and populist radical right attitudes: A comparative European analysis
Darder, A. B., & Kenny, J. (2026) · The British Journal of Politics and International Relations · doi:10.1177/13691481261433379
“These attitudes have been shown to predict belief in conspiracy theories (Enders et al., 2023; Krouwel and Van Prooijen, 2021), whose core definitional element posits that elites carry out malevolent secret actions for their own benefit (Sunstein and Vermeule, 2009).”
Examining Narrative Patterns in Disinformation and Trustworthy News: A Comparative Analysis
Mandravickaitė, J., & Krilavičius, T. (2026) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci15040255 · Cited by 1
Network societies: Neoliberal materials for an exploratory theory
Mlađenović, N. (2025) · CM Communication and Media · doi:10.5937/cm20-49591
Are Conspiracy Theories Problematically Self-Sealing?
Hagen, K. G. (2026) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2026.10115
COVID-19 Pandemisine Yönelik Komplo Teorilerinin Bireylerin Aşı Niyetine Etkisi
Balçık, S. M., Varol, E., & Taşbaş, E. H. O. (2026) · İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi · doi:10.17336/igusbd.1606645
Conspiracy Mentality and Political Orientation across 26 countriesPreprint
Zimmer, F., & Imhoff, R. (2022) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
How conspiracy theories are defined: A systematic qualitative review of academic definitions
Nefes, T. S., Escobar, J. M., & González-Albo, B. (2026) · Open Research Europe · doi:10.12688/openreseurope.23324.1
Rao, H., & Greve, H. R. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197772324.003.0009
Topic Modeling and Word Embedding
Rao, H., & Greve, H. R. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197772324.005.0001
Linguistic Patterns in Online Conspiracy Theory
Rao, H., & Greve, H. R. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197772324.003.0001
Opportunities for Future Research
Rao, H., & Greve, H. R. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197772324.003.0010
Rao, H., & Greve, H. R. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197772324.003.0005
Metadata
- Authors
- Sunstein, C. R., & Vermeule, A.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Political Philosophy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-04-13
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 202-227
- ISSN
- 0963-8016 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9760
- OpenAlex
- W2009369609
- Cited by
- 1,050
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 92 · 2025: 90 · 2024: 98 · 2023: 109 · 2022: 161 · 2021: 107 · 2020: 102 · 2019: 78 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 2.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- nrs.harvard.edu
- Locations
- Journal of Political Philosophy (publishedVersion)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
- Keywords
- conspiracy theories, 9/11 conspiracy theories, cognitive errors, epistemology, misinformation, extremist groups, countering disinformation, public policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
