The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conspiracy theories: Causes and cures
Open accessAbstract
Many millions of people hold conspiracy theories; they believe that powerful people have worked together in order to withhold the truth about some important practice or some terrible event. A recent example is the belief, widespread in some parts of the world, that the attacks of 9/11 were carried out not by Al Qaeda, but by Israel or the United States. Those who subscribe to conspiracy theories may create serious risks, including risks of violence, and the existence of such theories raises significant challenges for policy and law. The first challenge is to understand the mechanisms by which conspiracy theories prosper; the second challenge is to understand how such theories might be undermined. Such theories typically spread as a result of identifiable cognitive blunders, operating in conjunction with informational and reputational influences. A distinctive feature of conspiracy theories is their self-sealing quality. Conspiracy theorists are not likely to be persuaded by an attempt to dispel their theories; they may even characterize that very attempt as further proof of the conspiracy. Because those who hold conspiracy theories typically suffer from a crippled epistemology, in accordance with which it is rational to hold such theories, the best response consists in cognitive infiltration of extremist groups. Various policy dilemmas, such as the question whether it is better for government to rebut conspiracy theories or to ignore them, are explored in this light.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Similarly, different strategies for successful intervention may apply for people who hold strong anti-vaccine conspiracy beliefs than those who do not hold strong beliefs [44].”
From The Effects of Anti-Vaccine Conspiracy Theories on Vaccination Intentions (2014) · cites this paper as [44]
In the citing paper
“Conspiracist ideation is also typically immune to falsification because contradictory evidence (e.g., climate scientists being exonerated of accusations) can be accommodated by broadening the scope of the conspiracy (exonerations are a whitewash), often with considerable creativity [32].”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [32]
In the citing paper
“evidence against conspiracy theories is often construed as evidence for them, because the evidence is interpreted as arising from the conspiracy in question”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [32]
In the citing paper
“These general and robust findings help identify communicative means by which the motivated reasoning can be attenuated or circumvented [5], [32], [38], [50].”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [32]
Citations
Cites
Conspiracy Theories and the Conventional Wisdom
Pigden, C. (2007) · Episteme · doi:10.3366/epi.2007.4.2.219 · Cited by 86
Conspiracy Theories and the Internet: Controlled Demolition and Arrested Development
Clarke, S. (2007) · Episteme · doi:10.3366/epi.2007.4.2.167 · Cited by 67
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 999
Wang, Y., Thier, K., & Nan, X. (2022) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/7te56 · Cited by 12
Herman, T., & Oswald, S. (2022) · Discourse approaches to politics, society and culture · doi:10.1075/dapsac.98.05her · Cited by 10
Dynel, M., & Zappavigna, M. (2023) · Discourse Context & Media · doi:10.1016/j.dcm.2023.100670 · Cited by 12
“While it can be used nonpejoratively in reference to any hypothesis about any conspiratorial plot, the label “conspiracy theory” is conventionally applied to whatever is considered an unequivocally ridiculous, unfounded narrative, which is scoffed at and easily debunked (Sunstein and Vermeule, 2009).”
BackgroundLearning from the Ex-Believers: Individuals' Journeys In and Out of Conspiracy Theories Online
Engel, K., Phadke, S., & Mitra, T. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3610076 · Cited by 13
“For example, as indicated in the theoretical work by Sunstein [69], empirical works found that users’ social interactions and availability of limited information can lead them deeper into conspiracy theory rabbit holes [37, 56].”
BackgroundInfluentialSchulte-Cloos, J., & Anghel, V. (2023) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2023.2291538 · Cited by 15
“A conspiracy theory can generally be defined as “an effort to explain some event or practice by reference to the machinations of powerful people, who attempt to conceal their role” (Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009).”
BackgroundCombatting conspiracies in the classroom: Teacher strategies and perceived outcomes
Jerome, L., Kisby, B., & McKay, S. E. (2024) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1002/berj.3955 · Cited by 10
Trang, S. T.-N., Kraemer, T., Trenz, M., & Weiger, W. H. (2024) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2022.0494 · Cited by 17
9/11 Truth and the Silence of the IR Discipline
Hughes, D. (2020) · Alternatives Global Local Political · doi:10.1177/0304375419898334 · Cited by 10
“Of course, if elements of the U.S. government were complicit in 9/11, then pervasive efforts by “[US] government agents (and their allies)” (Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009, p. 244) to subvert the 9/11 truth movement make sense.”
BackgroundPersily, N., & Tucker, J. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.002 · Cited by 11
Responding to the spread of conspiracy theories
Shoaibi, N. (2022) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2022.2126393 · Cited by 10
“24Cassam in turn is following Sunstein and Vermeule (2009) in identifying CTs with the self-sealing feature. no surprise that they would end up being self-sealing in the sense that their members’ tend to be reluctant to change their views based on contrary evidence.”
BackgroundThe State Schema: Seeing Politics through Morality and Capacity
Leeds, T. (2020) · Qualitative Sociology · doi:10.1007/s11133-020-09453-0 · Cited by 10
Meuer, M., Oeberst, A., & Imhoff, R. (2021) · International Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.5334/irsp.587 · Cited by 9
Gibson, K. E., Sanders, C. E., & Lamm, A. J. (2021) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440211061324 · Cited by 10
“Conspiracy theories here refer to “an effort to explain some event or practice by reference to the machinations of powerful people, who attempt to conceal their role [. . .] until their aims are accomplished” (Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009, p. 205).”
BackgroundEpistemology and the Pandemic: Lessons from an Epistemic Crisis
Špecián, P. (2021) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2021.2009931 · Cited by 10
“Despite all the talk about ‘post-truth’ and the like (Vacura 2019), an acrossthe-board renunciation of expertise seems limited to particularly politicized topics and adherents of fringe epistemologies (Sunstein and Vermeule 2009; Kahan 2017; Nguyen 2020a).”
BackgroundZembylas, M. (2021) · Pedagogy Culture and Society · doi:10.1080/14681366.2021.1948911 · Cited by 10
“To some extent, note van Prooijen and Douglas, this assumption is understandable, because conspiracy theories can be found everywhere on the Internet (Culloty 2021; Sunstein and Vermeule 2009).”
BackgroundLiu, T.-Y., Guan, T., & Yuan, R.-D. (2022) · Journal of Chinese Political Science · doi:10.1007/s11366-022-09832-0 · Cited by 10
“Within conspiracy theories, the unequivocal condemnation of political opposition and the call for the urgent eradication of dissent undermines pluralist democratic discourse, thus fueling political polarization and radicalization [4, 45, 99].”
BackgroundDorling, D., & Gietel‐Basten, S. (2022) · Journal of Economic Sociology · doi:10.17323/1726-3247-2022-2-36-64 · Cited by 8
«3D-модель» российской экономики
Chepurenko, A. Y. (2022) · Journal of Economic Sociology · doi:10.17323/1726-3247-2022-2-118-128 · Cited by 8
Webb, R. E., & Rosenbaum, P. J. (2023) · Journal of Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.5964/jspp.8089 · Cited by 9
Unveiling the formation of conspiracy theory on social media: A discourse analysis
Li, B., Ji, D., Fu, M., Tan, C., Chong, A. Y., & Lim, E. T. K. (2023) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1177/02683962231175923 · Cited by 13
“Conspiracy theory denotes “ an effort to explain some event or practice by reference to the machinations of powerful people, who attempt to conceal their role ” (Sunstein and Vermeule, 2009: 205).”
InfluentialSağlam, E. (2024) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-041422-125802 · Cited by 10
“One of the most cited texts on this subject, by Sunstein & Vermeule (2009, p. 204) for instance, concocts the term “crippled epistemology” to frame conspiracism as a symptom of individuals having “a sharply limited number of (relevant) informational sources,” leading to a misrecognition of the…”
Conspiracy Theories in U.S. History
Olmstead, K. S. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0019 · Cited by 10
Furnham, A. F., & Horne, G. (2022) · Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.5093/jwop2022a2 · Cited by 9
“…have suggested that belief in conspiracies serve a psychological function for people who feel powerless, excluded or disadvantaged, to explain events that are difficult to comprehend (Furnham, 2021a; Sullivan et al., 2010; Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009; Uscinski & Parent, 2014; Walter & Drochon, 2020).”
BackgroundHalford, S. J. (2022) · Sociological Quarterly · doi:10.1080/00380253.2022.2060147 · Cited by 9
“…perspective has been adopted by those in power who compare conspiracy beliefs to an infectious disease that spreads through the public (Sunstein and Vermeule 2009), either with malicious intent or, as Clarke (2002) argues, as an unfortunate effect of the public’s “cognitive failure.””
BackgroundReligions and Conspiracy Theories as the Authoritarian “Other” of Democracy?
Hidalgo, O. F. (2022) · Politics and Governance · doi:10.17645/pag.v10i4.5826 · Cited by 12
“…role of conspiracy myths and narratives for the pathology of democracy, the schol‐ ars discuss almost exclusively the vices and pathologies conspiracy theories imply for democracy, e.g., misinfor‐ mation (Bronner, 2013; Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009) or political radicalisation (Lee, 2020).”
BackgroundI want to believe: The relationship between conspiratorial beliefs and populist attitudes in Spain
Guinjoan, M., & Galais, C. (2023) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2022.102574 · Cited by 12
Cornejo, R. C. (2024) · Latin American Research Review · doi:10.1017/lar.2024.11 · Cited by 10
The Problem of Disinformation: A Critical Approach
Hayward, T. (2024) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2024.2346127 · Cited by 19
“In an influential article co-authored with Adrian Vermeule (Sunstein and Vermeule 2009), responding to what they regard as the particular problem of disinformation fuelled by a growing profusion of ‘conspiracy theories’, he has argued that it is better to take general steps to suppress them, at the cost of sometimes s…”
Power, politics, and paranoia: an introduction
van Prooijen, J., & Lange, P. A. M. V. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139565417.002 · Cited by 8
The Conspiratorial Style in Turkish Politics
Nefes, T. S. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0026 · Cited by 9
Byington, B. (2019) · Journal of Contemporary Antisemitism · doi:10.26613/jca/2.1.19 · Cited by 9
Exposure to conspiracy theories in the lab
Balafoutas, L., Libman, A., Selamis, V., & Vollan, B. (2021) · Economic and Political Studies · doi:10.1080/20954816.2020.1818930 · Cited by 9
Barua, Z. (2022) · Human Arenas · doi:10.1007/s42087-022-00291-w · Cited by 6
“Several persuasion and behavior change theories have been used to comprehend the individual and social factors that affect public health behaviors (Tan et al., 2015).”
InfluentialTowards a Conceptual Framework for Conspiracy Theory Theories
Pfeifer, N. (2023) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2023.2172698 · Cited by 9
“…on the one hand that ‘conspiracy theories are a subset of the larger category of false beliefs’ and on the other hand that ‘some conspiracy theories have turned out to be true, and under our definition, they do not cease to be conspiracy theories for that reason’ (Sunstein and Vermeule 2009, 206).”
BackgroundTam, L., & Lee, H. (2023) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/00027642231174330 · Cited by 13
“Sunstein and Vermeule (2009) noted the serious risks of some conspiracy theories and the importance of understanding the “causes” and “cures” of conspiracy cascades.”
The Collaborative Construction and Evolution of Pseudo-knowledge in Online Conversations
Introne, J. E., Iandoli, L., DeCook, J. R., Yildirim, I., & Elzeini, S. (2017) · International Conference on Social Media and Society (SMSociety) · doi:10.1145/3097286.3097297 · Cited by 9
“The “state-of-the-art” approach of saturating a social system with rational, evidence-based argument [54] does not consider the drivers of PK evolution on the Internet and could, paradoxically, inoculate greater resistance.”
BackgroundConspiracy Thinking, Tolerance, and Democracy
Smallpage, S. M. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0012 · Cited by 9
Psychologia myślenia spiskowego
Grzesiak-Feldman, M. (2016) · Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego eBooks · doi:10.31338/uw.9788323522157 · Cited by 5
Collective attention in the age of (mis)informationPreprint
Mocanu, D., Rossi, L., Zhang, Q. F., Karsai, M., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1403.3344 · Cited by 10
“nment, are more susceptible to false information. Conclusions Conspiracists generally tend to explain a signicant social or political aspect as a secret plot by powerful individuals or organizations [17] and their activity is proliferating over the web. This study provides a genuine outline of the online social dynami…”
BackgroundComprehending Covidiocy Communication
Spitzberg, B. H. (2021) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119751809.ch2 · Cited by 13
Kim, S., Tam, L., & Taylor, M. (2023) · International Journal of Strategic Communication · doi:10.1080/1553118x.2023.2235332 · Cited by 10
“They offer alternative explanations to those who seek to understand events that are insufficiently explained by mainstream accounts (Hardin, 2002; Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009).”
BackgroundPanerati, S., & Salvati, M. (2025) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12866 · Cited by 8
“It’s a Growing and Serious Problem:” Teaching 9/11 to Combat Misinformation and Conspiracy Theories
Berman, D. S., & Stoddard, J. D. (2021) · The Social Studies · doi:10.1080/00377996.2021.1929054 · Cited by 8
“Second, this does not offset the backfire effect and the information coming from an authority figure, a teacher, could further intensify conspiracy endorsement (Craft et al., 2017; Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAghajari, Z., Baumer, E. P. S., & DiFranzo, D. J. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3580946 · Cited by 9
“For example, norms of online communities can play an important role on the way community members perceive and respond to conspiracies and related misinformation [39, 102, 122].”
BackgroundAlternative Epistemology in Far-Right Anti-Publics: A Qualitative Study of Australian Activists
Peucker, M., & Spaaij, R. (2023) · International Journal of Politics Culture and Society · doi:10.1007/s10767-023-09456-z · Cited by 14
“…it helps to further advance the concept by highlighting how psychological factors and social processes shape the interplay between the ‘self-sealing quality’ (Sunstein & Vermeulen, 2009) of conspiratorial thinking and the development of an ideological meta-narrative within these anti-publics.”
Social Media Hate and Misinformation Campaign in the Nigeria 2023 Elections.
Jimada, U. (2023) · IJRDO - Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research · doi:10.53555/sshr.v9i7.5734 · Cited by 9
The power of second-order conspiracies
Stamatiadis‐Bréhier, A. (2024) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2024.2375781 · Cited by 8
Lewandowsky, S. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0010 · Cited by 12
‘Things are not what they seem to be’: A proposal for the spectrum approach to conspiracy beliefs
Starčević, V., & Brakoulias, V. (2021) · Australasian Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/10398562211008182 · Cited by 9
When a conspiracy theory goes mainstream, people feel more positive toward conspiracy theorists
Bram, C. (2021) · Research & Politics · doi:10.1177/20531680211067640 · Cited by 8
Conspiracy Stress or Relief? Learned Helplessness and Conspiratorial Thinking
Farhart, C. E., Miller, J. M., & Saunders, K. L. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197578384.003.0011 · Cited by 10
Modelling the relationship between counter‐knowledge and open‐mindedness for policy development
Martínez‐Ortiz, P., Moffett, S., Cegarra‐Navarro, J., & Hernández, F. A. L. (2016) · Journal of Public Affairs · doi:10.1002/pa.1605 · Cited by 10
“As Sunstein and Vermeule (2009) highlight, governments that instil values of corporate governance such as fairness, transparency, open communication and Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. trust can reduce the effects of local rumours, mistrust of citizens and scepticism of staff members’…”
BackgroundWhy the Powerful (in Weak States) Prefer Conspiracy Theories
Radnitz, S. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0023 · Cited by 8
Adam, S., Rohrbach, T., Keller, F., Makhortykh, M., de León, E., Valli, C., Baghumyan, A., & Sydorova, M. (2025) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1093/joc/jqaf033 · Cited by 9
A Model of Populism as a Conspiracy Theory
Szeidl, Á., & Szücs, F. (2025) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20240010 · Cited by 9
Appel, M., & Mehretab, S. (2019) · Die Psychologie des Postfaktischen: Über Fake News, „Lügenpresse“, Clickbait & Co. · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-58695-2_11 · Cited by 10
Conspirituality and the web: A case study of David Icke’s media use
Ballinger, D., & Hardy, A. L. (2022) · Journal of Contemporary Religion · doi:10.1080/13537903.2022.2105517 · Cited by 7
“…in political studies and the social sciences considers them as forms of psychopathological thought, on both the individual and social level (e.g. Sunstein and Vermeule 2009); for cultural studies scholars, the current prominence of conspiracy theories can be taken as metaphorical expressions of…”
BackgroundConspiracy Theory Belief: A Sane Response to an Insane World?
Pierre, J. M. (2023) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-023-00716-7 · Cited by 8
Kim, Y., & Lim, H. D. (2024) · Journal of Public Relations Research · doi:10.1080/1062726x.2024.2333549 · Cited by 8
“Conspiracy theories are beliefs that powerful individuals or groups cause wide-ranging and significant events and circum-stances – including economic crises, natural disasters, and wars – for their own personal gain (Oliver & Wood, 2014; Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009).”
Simonson, M. D., Lacombe, M. J., Green, J., & Druckman, J. N. (2024) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10659129241249662 · Cited by 7
“We next turn to conspiracy theories, which are efforts to explain an event by invoking the machinations of powerful people, who attempt to conceal their role while pursuing malevolent goals (Sunstein and Vermeule 2009).”
Jia, H. (2021) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003160212 · Cited by 10
Fake News Incidents through the Lens of the DCAM Disinformation Blueprint
Rapti, M., Tsakalidis, G., Petridou, S. G., & Vergidis, K. (2022) · Information · doi:10.3390/info13070306 · Cited by 10
“These theories put forward unsourced information or jump to conclusions lacking disclosure [18,24].”
BackgroundFueling Toxicity? Studying Deceitful Opinion Leaders and Behavioral Changes of Their Followers
Guldemond, P., Casas, A., & van der Velden, M. A. C. G. (2022) · Politics and Governance · doi:10.17645/pag.v10i4.5756 · Cited by 10
“…using the concepts of fake news (Egelhofer & Lecheler, 2019; Guess et al., 2019), disinformation (Bennett & Livingston, 2018;McKay& Tenove, 2021), rumors (DiFonzo& Bordia, 2007; Friggeri et al., 2014), or conspiracies (Douglas et al., 2019; Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009), amongst other concepts.”
BackgroundDrinkwater, K., Dagnall, N., & Denovan, A. (2023) · Journal of Scientific Exploration · doi:10.31275/20232751 · Cited by 7
Classifying Conspiratorial Narratives at Scale: False Alarms and Erroneous Connections
Diab, A., Nefriana, R., & Lin, Y. (2024) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v18i1.31318 · Cited by 9
The Truth Is Around Here Somewhere
Bost, P. R. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0018 · Cited by 8
Libman, A., & Vollan, B. (2019) · Homo Oeconomicus · doi:10.1007/s41412-019-00082-9 · Cited by 8
Cargnino, M. (2020) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edaa036 · Cited by 7
Siem, B., B. Kretzmeyer, & Stürmer, S. (2021) · Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology · doi:10.1177/18344909211052587 · Cited by 5
“For instance, work investigating the specific ways in which conspiracy theories develop (e.g., Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009) assumes that, although in its formation phase a conspiracy theory is likely to be accepted only by those who strongly believe in it, at a later point in time individuals with…”
BackgroundContesting Epistemic Authority: Conspiracy Theories on the Boundaries of Science
Harambam, J., & Aupers, S. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-69649-8_8 · Cited by 7
Juanchich, M., Sirota, M., Jolles, D., et al. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/au8j2 · Cited by 7
Trust Nobody: How Voters React To Conspiracy TheoriesPreprint
Invernizzi, G. M., & Mohamed, A. E. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3507190 · Cited by 6
Arnulf, J. K., & Furnham, A. F. (2024) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104156 · Cited by 6
Baća, B. (2024) · Theory Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/02632764241258404 · Cited by 7
“…evidence and in deciding what question they want to ask’ (Byford, 2011: 92); second, they ‘indis-criminately accept any argument that points to conspiracy’ (Pipes, 1997: 41); and third, they are ‘resistant and in extreme cases invulnerable to contrary evidence’ (Sunstein and Vermeule, 2009: 223).”
Gökalp, A., Üztemur, S., Huang, P., Kartol, A., Tsai, H., Dinç, E., Griffiths, M. D., & Lin, C. (2025) · Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1002/brb3.70275 · Cited by 7
Power Preservation, No Matter the Means
Vučković, V., Radeljić, B., & Đorđević, V. (2025) · Communist and Post-Communist Studies · doi:10.1525/cpcs.2025.2458747 · Cited by 7
Marwick, A. E., Pippert, C., Furl, K., & Schnabel, E. (2025) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051251357483 · Cited by 10
“Conspiracy theories are a prominent form of online disinfor-mation claiming powerful individuals secretly drive social phenomena (Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009).”
Cognition and Conspiracy Theories
Мусолфф, А. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009660662 · Cited by 6
Jennings, F. J., Neville-Shepard, R., Jackson, D. B., Magusiak, A., & Sigrist, K. (2024) · Southern Communication Journal · doi:10.1080/1041794x.2024.2308892 · Cited by 6
“Moreover, Sunstein and Vermeule (2009) discussed “conspiracy cascades” and how fringe narratives often start with conspiracy entrepreneurs who begin circulating a controversial idea for attention.”
BackgroundAddressing conspiracy theories through Media and Data Literacy Education. An exploratory case study
Fabbro, F., & Gabbi, E. (2024) · Journal of Media Literacy Education · doi:10.23860/jmle-2024-16-1-2 · Cited by 6
“…the role of education CT are attempts to explain a phenomenon or an event in terms of actors secretly abusing their power to accomplish their own goals with the result of depriving the people of rights, freedom, prosperity, health or knowledge (Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009; Uscinski & Parent, 2014).”
BackgroundClarke, S. (2024) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2024.2371482 · Cited by 6
“33 Cassam’s (2023) characterisation of conspiracy theories as ‘self-sealing’ is echoed by Sunstein and Vermeule (2009), and by Napolitano (2021).”
Political Polarization and Nisman’s Death: Competing Conspiracy Theories in Argentina
Rodriguez, L., & Smallman, S. C. (2016) · Journal of International and Global Studies · doi:10.62608/2158-0669.1322 · Cited by 6
“…groups within society may adopt widely varying opinions on the validity of conspiracy theories: “Speaking with like-minded others, some people may come to find such a theory irresistible, [while] others may come to find it preposterous” (Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009, 217; see also McHoskey, 1995).”
BackgroundChan, M. S., Jones, C., & Albarracín, D. (2017) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190497620.013.37 · Cited by 6
The Credulity of Conspiracy Theorists
Keeley, B. L. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0029 · Cited by 5
Li, Z.-T., Qiu, H.-F., & Zhou, Q. (2021) · International journal of human computer interactions · doi:10.1080/10447318.2021.1960726 · Cited by 4
“Sunstein and Vermeule (2009) posited that, when an increasing number of social members were convinced of a conspiracy theory, those who did not believe in the theory would also accept it under group pressures.”
BackgroundDo Conspiracies Tend to Fail? Philosophical Reflections on a Poorly Supported Academic Meme
Hagen, K. G. (2022) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2021.55 · Cited by 6
“In their own way, Sunstein and Vermeule (2009) make the claim as well, at least with respect to “open societies.””
BackgroundThe Ideological Slant of COVID-19-Related Conspiracies. A New Niche for the Far-Right?
Galais, C., & Guinjoan, M. (2022) · Representation · doi:10.1080/00344893.2022.2034660 · Cited by 6
“Previous studies have related these specific conspiracy theories to right-wing attitudes (Barreto, Cooper, Gonzalez, Parker, & Towler, 2011; Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009), ideologically extreme leanings (van Prooijen, Krouwel, & Pollet, 2015) and populist preferences (Mancosu, Vassallo, & Vezzoni,…”
BackgroundSapountzis, A., Figgou, L., & Michos, I. (2022) · Feminism & Psychology · doi:10.1177/09593535221113648 · Cited by 6
“For some researchers, conspiracy theories may constitute a flawed way of thinking related to some cognitive deficit (e.g., Darwin et al., 2011; Goertzel, 1994; Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009).”
BackgroundDemata, M., Zorzi, V., & Zottola, A. (2022) · Discourse approaches to politics, society and culture · doi:10.1075/dapsac.98.01dem · Cited by 6
Is Conspiracism Endogenous to Populism? A Discursive-Theoretical Analysis
Markou, G. (2022) · Redescriptions Political Thought Conceptual History and Feminist Theory · doi:10.33134/rds.376 · Cited by 7
Waves of disinformation in the hybrid Russian-Ukrainian war
Krainikova, T., & Prokopenko, S. (2023) · Current Issues of Mass Communication · doi:10.17721/cimc.2023.33.12-25 · Cited by 6
Where next for behavioral public policy?
Chater, N., & Loewenstein, G. (2023) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x23002091 · Cited by 4
Betting on Conspiracy: A Decision Theoretic Account of the Rationality of Conspiracy Theory Belief
Tsapos, M. (2024) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-024-00785-9 · Cited by 9
“There are the gener-alists who argue that belief in conspiracy theories is prima facie irrational (Cas-sam, 2019; Napolitano, 2022; Napolitano & Reuter, 2021; Sunstein and Vermeule, 2009).”
BackgroundDivergent impact of belief in COVID-19 misinformation on cross-border tourism
Antwi, C. O., Ntim, S. Y., Zhang, J., Asante, E. A., Darko, A. P., & Ren, J. (2024) · Journal of Destination Marketing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.jdmm.2024.100901 · Cited by 6
Who Believes in Conspiracy Theories in Venezuela?
Carey, J. M. (2017) · Latin American Research Review · doi:10.25222/larr.88 · Cited by 6
Fallon, K. (2019) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/luminos.80 · Cited by 7
Hwang, T. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.012 · Cited by 12
How Belief in Conspiracy Theories Addresses Some Basic Human Needs
Wheeler, E. A. (2020) · Identity in a changing world · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-38270-4_11 · Cited by 6
#HaStatoPutin Affinity Space: From Political Work to Autotelic Humor
Dynel, M. (2022) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051221138760 · Cited by 7
Spekulative Kommunikation und ihre Stigmatisierung
Kuhn, O. E. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-531-19324-3_15 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Sunstein, C. R., & Vermeule, A.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Political Philosophy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-04-13
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 202-227
- ISSN
- 0963-8016 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9760
- OpenAlex
- W2009369609
- Cited by
- 1,050
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 92 · 2025: 90 · 2024: 98 · 2023: 109 · 2022: 161 · 2021: 107 · 2020: 102 · 2019: 78 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 2.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- nrs.harvard.edu
- Locations
- Journal of Political Philosophy (publishedVersion)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
- Keywords
- conspiracy theories, 9/11 conspiracy theories, cognitive errors, epistemology, misinformation, extremist groups, countering disinformation, public policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review