The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conspiracy theories: Causes and cures
Open accessAbstract
Many millions of people hold conspiracy theories; they believe that powerful people have worked together in order to withhold the truth about some important practice or some terrible event. A recent example is the belief, widespread in some parts of the world, that the attacks of 9/11 were carried out not by Al Qaeda, but by Israel or the United States. Those who subscribe to conspiracy theories may create serious risks, including risks of violence, and the existence of such theories raises significant challenges for policy and law. The first challenge is to understand the mechanisms by which conspiracy theories prosper; the second challenge is to understand how such theories might be undermined. Such theories typically spread as a result of identifiable cognitive blunders, operating in conjunction with informational and reputational influences. A distinctive feature of conspiracy theories is their self-sealing quality. Conspiracy theorists are not likely to be persuaded by an attempt to dispel their theories; they may even characterize that very attempt as further proof of the conspiracy. Because those who hold conspiracy theories typically suffer from a crippled epistemology, in accordance with which it is rational to hold such theories, the best response consists in cognitive infiltration of extremist groups. Various policy dilemmas, such as the question whether it is better for government to rebut conspiracy theories or to ignore them, are explored in this light.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Similarly, different strategies for successful intervention may apply for people who hold strong anti-vaccine conspiracy beliefs than those who do not hold strong beliefs [44].”
From The Effects of Anti-Vaccine Conspiracy Theories on Vaccination Intentions (2014) · cites this paper as [44]
In the citing paper
“Conspiracist ideation is also typically immune to falsification because contradictory evidence (e.g., climate scientists being exonerated of accusations) can be accommodated by broadening the scope of the conspiracy (exonerations are a whitewash), often with considerable creativity [32].”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [32]
In the citing paper
“evidence against conspiracy theories is often construed as evidence for them, because the evidence is interpreted as arising from the conspiracy in question”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [32]
In the citing paper
“These general and robust findings help identify communicative means by which the motivated reasoning can be attenuated or circumvented [5], [32], [38], [50].”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [32]
Citations
Cites
Conspiracy Theories and the Conventional Wisdom
Pigden, C. (2007) · Episteme · doi:10.3366/epi.2007.4.2.219 · Cited by 86
Conspiracy Theories and the Internet: Controlled Demolition and Arrested Development
Clarke, S. (2007) · Episteme · doi:10.3366/epi.2007.4.2.167 · Cited by 67
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 999
Herold, M. (2025) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/ssqu.13481 · Cited by 2
Kiszkiel, Ł., Sowa, P., Laskowski, P. P., Alimowski, M., Moniuszko-Malinowska, A., Szczerbiński, Ł., Sołomacha, S., Skonieczna‐Żydecka, K., Samochowiec, J., Solmi, M., et al. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-99991-w · Cited by 3
“Conspiracy theories, broadly defined, attribute events to covert, intentional actions by powerful groups, often contradicting mainstream or official accounts 2,3 .”
Using Artificial Intelligence to Better Understand Human Intelligence
Pennycook, G., Costello, T. H., & Rand, D. G. (2026) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09637214261417960 · Cited by 2
Alam, Z. (2026) · Journal of Public Policy and Administration · doi:10.11648/j.jppa.20261002.13 · Cited by 2
Doing Your Own Patient Activist Research
McKenna, R. (2026) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2026.2646178 · Cited by 2
Gerüchte, Verschwörungstheorien und Propaganda
Coady, D. P. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-531-19324-3_13 · Cited by 2
Misinformation in the loop: the emergence ofnarratives in Online Social Networks
Bessi, A., Coletto, M., Davidescu, G. A., Scala, A., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2014) · Cited by 2
Mariniello, M. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198831471.003.0013 · Cited by 4
Philosophie der Verschwörungstheorien: Eine kommentierte Übersicht über die philosophische Debatte
Minkin, D. (2022) · Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung · doi:10.3196/004433022835885681 · Cited by 2
Конспирологическое мышление: понятие, измерение и факторы
Kazun, A. (2022) · Journal of Economic Sociology · doi:10.17323/1726-3247-2022-2-91-117 · Cited by 5
Sato, R. (2023) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2023.2210161 · Cited by 4
Ignore, Rebut or Embrace: Political Elite Responses to Conspiracy Theories
Nwokora, Z. (2023) · Political Studies Review · doi:10.1177/14789299231193570 · Cited by 2
“Recent scholarship has mainly considered what policies, laws and institutions might be introduced (e.g. Cíbik and Hardoš, 2022; Sunstein and Vermeule, 2009).”
BackgroundInfluentialNine. Anti-Feminism in the Context of Corona Conspiracy Theories in Germany
Bauer, M. F. (2023) · Edinburgh University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781399505413-013 · Cited by 3
Diržytė, A. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su152215722 · Cited by 2
Malešević, S., Uzelac, G., Carol, S., & David, L. (2024) · National Identities · doi:10.1080/14608944.2023.2288970 · Cited by 2
“As Sunstein and Vermeule (2009) argue these communities generate the environment of ‘ emotional snowballing ’ whereby one ’ s reactions to negative emotions create more of such emotions.”
BackgroundWhat To Do About Conspiracy Theories?
Drążkiewicz, E., & Harambam, J. (2024) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781032647463 · Cited by 3
Internet Addiction and COVID-19 Misbeliefs Among Hungarian Online Gamers: A Cross-Sectional Study
Nemes, A., Szok, D., Tibold, A., Kósa, G., Kapus, K., Berke, G., Bankó, Z., & Fehér, G. (2024) · Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare · doi:10.2147/jmdh.s451825 · Cited by 2
Nationalism, Status, and Conspiracy Theories: Evidence from Pakistan
Mir, A., & Siddiqui, N. A. (2024) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123424000140 · Cited by 2
“Conspiracy theories are distinct from but adjacent to misinformation, with the important distinction that while misinformation is provably false, conspiracy theories are often unverifiable (Sunstein and Vermeule 2009).”
Repressive suspicion, or: the problem with conspiracy theories
Conway, P. R. (2024) · Cultural Studies · doi:10.1080/09502386.2024.2364260 · Cited by 2
“Leading academics still counsel us to ‘assume a well-motivated government’ to police our dissent (Sunstein and Vermeule 2009, p. 219).”
Conspiracy Theatre of the Absurd: “Birds Aren’t Real” as Parodic Hypermimesis
Neville-Shepard, R., & Neville-Shepard, M. (2024) · Rhetoric Society Quarterly · doi:10.1080/02773945.2024.2375196 · Cited by 1
da Silva, W. G. A. (2024) · Vibrant Virtual Brazilian Anthropology · doi:10.1590/1809-43412024v21e211012 · Cited by 3
Criminology, Conspiracy Theories and Theorizing Conspiracy
Kindynis, T. (2024) · The British Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1093/bjc/azae100 · Cited by 4
On the Censorship of Conspiracy Theories
Matthews, F. (2025) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2025.2449612 · Cited by 2
True believers, entertainers, and skeptical scholars: claims and frames on conspiracy TikTok
Pippert, C., Furl, K., & Marwick, A. E. (2025) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2025.2458025 · Cited by 2
Brown, C., Luzmore, R., & Wang, Y. (2025) · Information · doi:10.3390/info16030248 · Cited by 3
“As Sunstein and Vermeule [26] explain, conspiracy theorists often rely on systematically limited or biased informational sources, leading them to interpret misleading signals as credible [27].”
Pujalte, L. Q., & León-Moral, N. (2025) · Palabra Clave · doi:10.5294/pacla.2025.28.s1.2 · Cited by 2
Matthias, C., Benn, Y., & Harkin, B. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0323436 · Cited by 2
“Emotional validation, if not carefully balanced with exposure to corrective information, may inadvertently deepen belief entrenchment [121].”
van Es, L., van Prooijen, J., van Buuren, J., & van Veldhuizen, A. (2025) · European Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1177/14773708251351728 · Cited by 2
“Belief in some conspiracy theories is widespread (Oliver and Wood, 2014; Sunstein and Vermeule, 2009).”
Beyond Fact-Checking: The Importance of Logic-Checking in Public Discourse
Ryan, S., & Hammerton, M. (2025) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2025.2549830 · Cited by 2
“These problems, which have received a lot of attention in recent years, include epistemic bubbles (Nguyen 2020; Pollock 2024), fake news (Gelfert 2018; Rini 2017; Ryan 2021), and conspiracy theories (Coady 2019; Dentith 2019; Sunstein and Vermeule 2009).”
Gundersen, A., Biddlestone, M., & Kunst, J. R. (2025) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218251396952 · Cited by 2
“Consequently, actors who openly disseminate conspiracy theories—sometimes referred to as “conspiracy entrepreneurs” (Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009)—could appear strategic or manipulative, possibly being criticized on moral grounds (Uscinski et al., 2018) and viewed as less warm (Cao et al., 2025).”
InfluentialCitizenship and immigrant anti-rumour strategies: a critical outlook from the Barcelona case
Falguera, X. C., Hortalà, P. C., & Prieto‐Flores, Ò. (2017) · Citizenship Studies · doi:10.1080/13621025.2017.1414153 · Cited by 2
“This is ambivalent information disseminated under the shadow of doubt, without corroborating evidence (Bordia and DiFonzo 2002; Sunstein 2010) and that is presented as an explanation, often simplified, of concerns or issues of interest in a community (Sunstein and Vermeule 2009; Sunstein 2010).”
Filer, T. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0027 · Cited by 3
Les Théories du complotMoyen d’explication légitime, pensée irrationnelle, étiquette commode ?
Urbanski, S. (2020) · Recherches & éducations · doi:10.4000/rechercheseducations.8311 · Cited by 2
Inoculating Students Against Conspiracy Theories: The Case of Covid-19
Bailin, S., & Battersby, M. (2022) · Argumentation library · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-91017-4_14 · Cited by 2
Devotees on an Astroturf: Media, Politics, and Outrage in the Suicide of a Popular FilmStar
Akbar, S. Z., Sharma, A., Mishra, D., Mothilal, R. K., Negi, H., Nishal, S., Panda, A., & Pal, J. (2022) · The Compass · doi:10.1145/3530190.3534801 · Cited by 2
“20-80 per cent of populations, depending on the country and issue considered [36] [107].”
BackgroundLano, C. (2022) · Ars digitalis · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-36312-3_12 · Cited by 2
Mariniello, M. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198831471.003.0005 · Cited by 2
Socio-technical context for insertable devices
Heffernan, K. J., Vetere, F., & Chang, S. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.991345 · Cited by 2
Alethische und Narrative Modelle von Verschwörungstheorien
Heering, D. C. (2023) · Zeitschrift für Praktische Philosophie · doi:10.22613/zfpp/9.2.6 · Cited by 2
“Spreader of conspiracies”: How major U.S. newspapers differentiate them from Facebook
Habib, A. M. T., Yousuf, M., & Mohammed, I. (2023) · Newspaper Research Journal · doi:10.1177/07395329231187634 · Cited by 5
“For instance, they lead to polarization due to a lack of heterogeneous input (Sunstein, 2018; Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009).”
BackgroundWilhelm, C., & Schulz, A. (2023) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2023.2275012 · Cited by 2
“Besides these types of hate speech, conspiracies (Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009) and unverified rumors targeting members of social or demographic groups (Bhavnani et al., 2009) can be considered as potential hate speech.”
Filho, M. C., de Carvalho, P. F. A., & Carvalho, S. D. (2023) · REVISTA QUAESTIO IURIS · doi:10.12957/rqi.2023.65409 · Cited by 2
How to Stay Popular: Threat, Framing, and Conspiracy Theory Longevity
Blackington, C., & Cayton, F. (2024) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592723003006 · Cited by 2
“While many CTs are false, others are proven true and become conspiracies (Sunstein and Vermeule 2009).”
Responding to a Rumor: How Crisis Response Strategies Influence Relationship Outcomes
Breuklander, B. (2015) · Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) · Cited by 2
Immigrazione, stili e temi: uno studio sui tweet dei politici italiani
Casara, B. G. S., Suitner, C., & Erseghe, T. (2020) · RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA · doi:10.3280/rip2020-001016 · Cited by 2
Effect of Health Education Vis Digital Media during COVID-19 Pandemic in India
Kumar, S. (2021) · International Journal of Current Science Research and Review · doi:10.47191/ijcsrr/v4-i10-21 · Cited by 1
“Unfortunately, about the virus and how to protect against it, while many people are sharing information, not all of it is correct [6-11].”
BackgroundExistence of Differential Belief Profiles of COVID-19 Narratives: The Role of Trust in SciencePreprint
Agley, J. D., & Xiao, Y. (2020) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-35919/v1 · Cited by 2
Hannah Arendt and the contemporary social construction of conspiracy theoristsPreprint
Lewandowsky, S. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/fm8yg · Cited by 3
Sternisko, A., Delouvée, S., & Bavel, J. J. V. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/3yfgz · Cited by 2
Special Issue on COVID-19 Collective Irrationalities: An Overview
Miyazono, K., & Iizuka, R. (2023) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2023.2221929 · Cited by 2
“They regard conspiracy theories to be wrong and dangerous, suffering from crippled epistemology (Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009).”
BackgroundDisinformation and Episodes of Regime TransformationPreprint
Sato, Y., Wiebrecht, F., Lindberg, S. I., & V-Dem Institute (2023) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4569010 · Cited by 1
“…the (lack of) truthfulness is a defining element of disinformation, conspiracy theories, however, can rarely be classified as verifiably false and instead often share the belief into secretive elites that exercise control over society (e.g., Sunstein and Vermeule, 2009; Pirro and Taggart, 2022).”
BackgroundReactionary Exiles. How Conspiracy Theorists Deal With Socio-Technological ExclusionPreprint
Grusauskaite, K., Harambam, J., & Aupers, S. (2024) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/hwgzp · Cited by 2
"Just Asking Questions": Doing Our Own Research on Conspiratorial Ideation by Generative AI Chatbots
FitzGerald, K. M., Riedlinger, M., Bruns, A., Harrington, S., Graham, T., & Angus, D. (2026) · Media and Communication · doi:10.17645/mac.11337 · Cited by 1
“…have appealed to fact-checkers and journalists to avoid amplifying conspiracy theory claims in debunks – one strategy for doing so is to avoid repeating the problematic claim in the headline and introduction of a debunk, by essentially bracketing problematic claims between factual…”
Volek, J. J., & Moravec, V. (2023) · European Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckad194 · Cited by 1
“Sunstein and Vermeule attribute identification with conspiracy theories to the so-called ‘crippled epistemology’, 15 which they argue results from a ‘sharply limited number of (relevant) informational sources’.”
BackgroundClimate Change Conspiracy Theories
Räikkä, J. (2023) · Handbooks in philosophy · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-07002-0_141 · Cited by 2
“Mesmo solto, Lula nunca será livre”:
Dibai, P. C. (2021) · Compolítica · doi:10.21878/compolitica.2021.11.1.452 · Cited by 2
Conspiracy beliefs and social media: Addressing a systemic risk
Lebrun, M., Dumur-Laanila, H., Nielen, G., & Hernández-Escayola, P. (2024) · Open Research Europe · doi:10.12688/openreseurope.17043.1 · Cited by 1
Reactionary Exiles. How Conspiracy Theorists Deal with Socio-Technological Exclusion
Grusauskaite, K., Harambam, J., & Aupers, S. (2024) · Cultural Sociology · doi:10.1177/17499755241248726 · Cited by 3
“…55, Unemployed, Interview) These views fall in line with what some scholars (Barkun, 2013; Sunstein and Vermeule, 2009) term the ‘self-sealing quality’ of conspiracy theories, that makes them ‘resistant and in extreme cases invulnerable to contrary evidence’ (Sunstein and Vermeule, 2009: 223).”
How Mumbo-Jumbo conquered the world: empirical analysis of conspiracy theories
Cevik, S. (2024) · Economic Change and Restructuring · doi:10.1007/s10644-024-09717-7 · Cited by 1
Studying Conspiracy Theory after the (Current) Rise of Right-Wing Populism
Fenster, M. (2024) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003474272-19 · Cited by 1
Teorias conspiratórias, redes digitais e crises epistêmica da democracia
Aggio, C. D. O. (2023) · Editora UFMG eBooks · doi:10.7476/9786588592335.0013 · Cited by 1
The role of climate change conspiracy in consumers’ pro-environmental behaviors
Thieme, J., Stafford, M. R., & Coleman, J. T. (2024) · ReMark - Revista Brasileira de Marketing · doi:10.5585/remark.v23i3.25550 · Cited by 1
Verschwörungstheorien und skeptische Hypothesen: immun gegen Gegenbelege?
Keil, R. J. G. (2024) · Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung · doi:10.3196/004433024839033077 · Cited by 1
George, A., Ahrens, M., Pierrehumbert, J. B., & McMahon, M. F. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-71210-4_3 · Cited by 1
Embodying the State in the Margins
Sağlam, E. (2025) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/733925 · Cited by 2
Demata, M. (2025) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003479550-8 · Cited by 2
Post-Enlightenment Self-Education
Matusov, E. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-90675-6_6 · Cited by 1
Promoting Conspiracy Theories Strategically
Hilden, D., & Kistner, M. R. (2025) · Quarterly Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1561/100.00024033 · Cited by 2
Barzen, A. (2025) · Frontiers in Sociology · doi:10.3389/fsoc.2025.1583960 · Cited by 1
“However, research has shown that belief in specific conspiracy theories or hypotheses is not confined to individuals with pathological tendencies (Sunstein and Vermeule, 2009).”
Conspiracy belief and the willful ignorance of information
Winter, K. (2025) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102146 · Cited by 1
Pjesivac, I., Klein, L., Zhao, W., Lu, X., & Yan, J. (2025) · Frontiers in Communication · doi:10.3389/fcomm.2025.1548575 · Cited by 1
Legitimacy in Flux: A Theoretical Inquiry into Bangladesh’s August 2024 Interim Regime
Das, J. J., & Mannan, K. A. (2025) · Journal of State Government and Mass Media · doi:10.64907/xkmf.v03i04.jsgmm1 · Cited by 1
Dimensions of conspiracy theories: toward a unifying framework
Tsapos, M. (2025) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2025.2604083 · Cited by 1
For Real?—Epistemic Trust Within Online Environments and the Lures of Conspiracy Thinking
Schmidt-Boddy, P., Vespermann, D., Melichar, H. G., & Fuchs, T. (2026) · Human Studies · doi:10.1007/s10746-025-09830-0 · Cited by 2
“Some have referred to this praxis as relying on a sort of “crippled epistemology” (Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009: 204; Dentith, 2014 : 13 ff.).”
Unmasking the Mechanism: How News Media Consumption Drives Conspiracy Beliefs
Jacobs, L., & van Aelst, P. (2026) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2026.2633613 · Cited by 1
Living the liberal life in illiberal contexts: the case for realist pluralist liberalism
Wong, B. Y. S. (2026) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2026.2649813 · Cited by 1
Between disclosure and conspiracy: the transparency effect on r/UFO and r/UAP subreddits
Bastos, M., & Duarte, M. E. (2026) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2026.2645882 · Cited by 1
The role of the conspiracy narrative triad in operationalizing conspiracy beliefs
Piliousis, A., & Gardikiotis, A. (2026) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-026-09351-8 · Cited by 2
“…theories can be defined as explanatory beliefs in which the ultimate causes of events are interpreted as a secret plot, hatched by a group of actors in secret meetings for the ultimate purpose of achieving malicious goals (Douglas & Sutton, 2023 ; Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009; Zonis & Joseph, 1994 ).”
Mashuri, A., & Esti Zaduqisti, C. (2026) · Social Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.32872/spb.17341 · Cited by 1
Kasianenko, K., Gardam, C., FitzGerald, K. M., Nagappa, A., Bruns, A., Weinbrand, S., Angus, D. J., Vilkins, S., & Obeid, A. K. (2026) · Media International Australia · doi:10.1177/1329878x261481856 · Cited by 1
Tracking the Response Dynamics of Implicit Partisan Biases.
Duran, N. D., Nicholson, S. P., & Dale, R. A. C. (2015) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 1
Un manque d’imagination : récits en concurrence sur le 11 septembre
Fenster, M., & Rollet, B. (2016) · Diogène · doi:10.3917/dio.249.0177 · Cited by 1
Rethinking Secrecy in Religion
MacGillavry, D. (2017) · Method & Theory in the Study of Religion · doi:10.1163/15700682-12341430 · Cited by 2
Political Knowledge and Fractured Perceptions
Marietta, M., & Barker, D. C. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190677176.003.0012 · Cited by 1
A failure of imagination: Competing narratives of 9/11 truth
Fenster, M. (2015) · Diogenes · doi:10.1177/0392192116669270 · Cited by 1
“The exception is Sunstein and Vermeule (2009), which attempts to prescribe strategies for the state to respond to conspiracy theories but does not describe how the state actually responds.”
BackgroundEadon, Y. M. (2020) · AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research · doi:10.5210/spir.v2020i0.11206 · Cited by 1
Veltzé, K. (2021) · Com press · doi:10.51480/compress.2021.4-1.260 · Cited by 1
Cardoso, T. D. S., Gomes, R. C. L. F., Nakagawa, F. S., et al. (2021) · Fronteiras - estudos midiáticos · doi:10.4013/fem.2021.232.12 · Cited by 1
Ahmad, I., Usman, A., Iqbal, K., et al. (2021) · Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences , University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar · doi:10.17582/journal.jeas/40.1.78.90 · Cited by 1
How Do We Become Ignorant? Affording Ignorance Through Epistemic Actions
Arfini, S. (2022) · Synthese Library/Synthese library · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-01922-7_10 · Cited by 1
An Introduction to Online Platforms
Mariniello, M. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198831471.003.0008 · Cited by 2
Mariniello, M. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198831471.003.0012 · Cited by 1
Malinen, S., Koivula, A., Keipi, T., & Saarinen, A. (2022) · Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-13694-8_10 · Cited by 1
Ideologies and the representation of identities in anti-vaccination conspiracy theories
Fiammenghi, C. (2022) · Discourse approaches to politics, society and culture · doi:10.1075/dapsac.98.15fia · Cited by 1
Modeling Misinformation With Q-Learning, Nim, and Multi-Agents
Huang, E., & Mui, P. (2022) · IEEE MIT Undergraduate Research Technology Conference (URTC) · doi:10.1109/urtc56832.2022.10002219 · Cited by 1
“This disintermediation encourages speculation, rumors, and mistrust, and can cause confusion about what is real news, what are rumors, and what is ”fake” news [3].”
BackgroundDon’t Look Up as Philosophy: Comets, Climate Change, and Why the Snacks Are Not Free
Lay, C., & Johnson, D. K. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-97134-6_112-2 · Cited by 1
Introduction: Myths of Plato, myths of modernity
Keum, T.-Y. (2023) · Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy · doi:10.1080/13698230.2023.2248809 · Cited by 2
Sağlam, E., & Sayan, P. (2023) · Akademik Hassasiyetler · doi:10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1317543 · Cited by 1
Avnur, Y., & Obiegbu, C. (2023) · Analytic Philosophy · doi:10.1111/phib.12322 · Cited by 1
Improving the Conditions for Business Startups in the Republic of Serbia
Ilic, B. S., & Đukić, G. (2023) · Advances in business strategy and competitive advantage book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-0527-0.ch003 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Sunstein, C. R., & Vermeule, A.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Political Philosophy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-04-13
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 202-227
- ISSN
- 0963-8016 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9760
- OpenAlex
- W2009369609
- Cited by
- 1,050
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 92 · 2025: 90 · 2024: 98 · 2023: 109 · 2022: 161 · 2021: 107 · 2020: 102 · 2019: 78 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 2.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- nrs.harvard.edu
- Locations
- Journal of Political Philosophy (publishedVersion)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
- Keywords
- conspiracy theories, 9/11 conspiracy theories, cognitive errors, epistemology, misinformation, extremist groups, countering disinformation, public policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review