The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conspiracy theories: Causes and cures
Open accessAbstract
Many millions of people hold conspiracy theories; they believe that powerful people have worked together in order to withhold the truth about some important practice or some terrible event. A recent example is the belief, widespread in some parts of the world, that the attacks of 9/11 were carried out not by Al Qaeda, but by Israel or the United States. Those who subscribe to conspiracy theories may create serious risks, including risks of violence, and the existence of such theories raises significant challenges for policy and law. The first challenge is to understand the mechanisms by which conspiracy theories prosper; the second challenge is to understand how such theories might be undermined. Such theories typically spread as a result of identifiable cognitive blunders, operating in conjunction with informational and reputational influences. A distinctive feature of conspiracy theories is their self-sealing quality. Conspiracy theorists are not likely to be persuaded by an attempt to dispel their theories; they may even characterize that very attempt as further proof of the conspiracy. Because those who hold conspiracy theories typically suffer from a crippled epistemology, in accordance with which it is rational to hold such theories, the best response consists in cognitive infiltration of extremist groups. Various policy dilemmas, such as the question whether it is better for government to rebut conspiracy theories or to ignore them, are explored in this light.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Similarly, different strategies for successful intervention may apply for people who hold strong anti-vaccine conspiracy beliefs than those who do not hold strong beliefs [44].”
From The Effects of Anti-Vaccine Conspiracy Theories on Vaccination Intentions (2014) · cites this paper as [44]
In the citing paper
“Conspiracist ideation is also typically immune to falsification because contradictory evidence (e.g., climate scientists being exonerated of accusations) can be accommodated by broadening the scope of the conspiracy (exonerations are a whitewash), often with considerable creativity [32].”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [32]
In the citing paper
“evidence against conspiracy theories is often construed as evidence for them, because the evidence is interpreted as arising from the conspiracy in question”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [32]
In the citing paper
“These general and robust findings help identify communicative means by which the motivated reasoning can be attenuated or circumvented [5], [32], [38], [50].”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [32]
Citations
Cites
Conspiracy Theories and the Conventional Wisdom
Pigden, C. (2007) · Episteme · doi:10.3366/epi.2007.4.2.219 · Cited by 86
Conspiracy Theories and the Internet: Controlled Demolition and Arrested Development
Clarke, S. (2007) · Episteme · doi:10.3366/epi.2007.4.2.167 · Cited by 67
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 999
Technologically scaffolded atypical cognition: the case of YouTube’s recommender system
Alfano, M., Fard, A. E., Carter, J. A., Clutton, P., & Klein, C. (2020) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02724-x · Cited by 123
On the Viability of Conspiratorial Beliefs
Grimes, D. R. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0147905 · Cited by 106
“We shall clarify the working definition of conspiracy theory here as being in line the characterisation of Sunstein et al [1] as “an effort to explain some event or practice by reference to the machinations of”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLazić, A., & Žeželj, I. L. (2021) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/09636625211011881 · Cited by 123
“Misinformation, as an important determinant of vaccine hesitancy, is often embedded in antivaccine conspiracy theories (CTs), that is, in the claims of secret plots by powerful actors, who attempt to conceal their role (Sunstein and Vermeule, 2009).”
BackgroundConspiracy Talk on Social Media: Collective Sensemaking during a Public Health Crisis
Kou, Y., Gui, X., Chen, Y., & Pine, K. (2017) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3134696 · Cited by 103
“Conspiracy theories can undermine democratic conversation and potentially fuel violence [64].”
BackgroundConspiracy Theories and Evidential Self-Insulation
Napolitano, M. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198863977.003.0005 · Cited by 104
“One of the reasons for this parallel is this self-sealing property that they seem to have (Sunstein and Vermeule 2008; Cassam 2019).”
BackgroundSiegel, A. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.005 · Cited by 123
Bessi, A., Petroni, F., Vicario, M. D., Zollo, F., Anagnostopoulos, A., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2015) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/2740908.2745939 · Cited by 97
“For instance, people who reject the link between HIV and AIDS generally believe that AIDS was created by the U.S. Government to control the African American population [26, 27].”
BackgroundPlenta, P. (2020) · Contemporary Politics · doi:10.1080/13569775.2020.1781332 · Cited by 97
Conceptualizing “Dark Platforms”. Covid-19-Related Conspiracy Theories on 8kun and Gab
Zeng, J., & Schäfer, M. S. (2021) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2021.1938165 · Cited by 125
“Our analysis of primary actors on Gab identified numerous “ dark influ-encers ” who have been suspended by Facebook and Twitter, many of whom are con-spiracy entrepreneurs (Sunstein and Vermeule 2009, 212) who profit from and monetize their visibility on social media.”
BackgroundBridging the great divide: Conspiracy theory research for the 21st century
Bütter, M., & Knight, P. (2015) · Diogenes · doi:10.1177/0392192116669289 · Cited by 95
“As Sunstein and Vermeule (2009) suggest in a discussion of what they call ‘conspiracy cascades’, in the era of opinion polls belief in conspiracy theory can become a self-fulfilling prophecy, because respondents are less likely to reject completely ideas that they know considerable numbers of other…”
BackgroundRomer, D., & Jamieson, K. H. (2021) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114480 · Cited by 105
“In short, information from experts (Sunstein and Vermeule, 2009; Uscinski et al., 2016) and the government (Earnshaw et al.”
Solar geoengineering and the chemtrails conspiracy on social media
Tingley, D. H., & Wagner, G. (2017) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-017-0014-3 · Cited by 96
Framing the Origins of COVID-19
Bolsen, T., Palm, R. I., & Kingsland, J. T. (2020) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547020953603 · Cited by 111
Partisanship, Individual Differences, and News Media Exposure as Predictors of Conspiracy Beliefs
Hollander, B. A. (2017) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1077699017728919 · Cited by 90
“…is the notion of factual accuracy, with conspiracy theories described as the “belief that covert, powerful forces are responsible for unexplained phenomena” that “typically (though not always) lack strong evidentiary support” (Nyhan et al., 2016, see also Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009).”
BackgroundCharacterizing polarization in online vaccine discourse—A large-scale study
Mønsted, B., & Lehmann, S. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0263746 · Cited by 108
“The finding that users interact disproportionally with other users sharing their stance, aligns with previous findings that long time anti-vaccine users of social media tend to form tightly knit clusters which exhibit a high degree of in-group solidarity [46], and in which misinformation may thrive unquestioned [47].”
ResultNapolitano, M. G., & Reuter, K. (2021) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-021-00441-6 · Cited by 91
Conspiracy Theory: Truth Claim or Language Game?
Bjerg, O., & Presskorn‐Thygesen, T. (2016) · Theory Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/0263276416657880 · Cited by 89
“(Sunstein and Vermeule, 2009: 219) To some readers, this may sound like something out of an old STASI manual but the authors fortunately provide the following consolation: Throughout, we assume a well-motivated government that aims to eliminate conspiracy theories, or draw their poison, if and only…”
BackgroundInfluentialThe spread of COVID-19 conspiracy theories on social me-dia and the effect of content moderation
Papakyriakopoulos, O., Serrano, J. C. M., & Hegelich, S. (2020) · Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review · doi:10.37016/mr-2020-034 · Cited by 103
Examining conspiracist beliefs about the disappearance of Amelia Earhart
Swami, V., & Furnham, A. (2012) · The Journal of General Psychology · doi:10.1080/00221309.2012.697932 · Cited by 88
“…typically discussed conspiracist ideation in the context of attribution errors (Clarke, 2002), the affective states produced by catastrophic events (Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009), or the biased assimilation of information and attitude polarization (McHoskey, 1995; see also Leman & Cinnirella, 2007).”
BackgroundInfluentialKim, M., & Cao, X. (2016) · International journal of communication · Cited by 84
Informational cues, partisan-motivated reasoning, and the manipulation of conspiracy beliefs
Enders, A. M., & Smallpage, S. M. (2019) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2018.1493006 · Cited by 82
“Moreover, while exposure undoubtedly happens in small social networks of friends, family, and other close acquaintances, most salient conspiracy theories and conspiracy information exposure happens on the elite level (Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009).”
BackgroundThe role of system identity threat in conspiracy theory endorsement
Federico, C. M., Williams, A. L., & Vitriol, J. A. (2018) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2495 · Cited by 85
Are Conspiracy Theorists Epistemically Vicious?
Pigden, C. R. (2016) · doi:10.1002/9781118869109.ch9 · Cited by 83
Arceneaux, K., & Truex, R. (2023) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592722000901 · Cited by 97
Fong, A. A., Roozenbeek, J., Goldwert, D., Rathje, S., & van der Linden, S. (2021) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430220987596 · Cited by 82
“…with the observation that “belief in conspiracy theories is strongly rooted in negative emotions” (van Prooijen & Douglas, 2018, p. 902; see also Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009),5 and echoes findings from prior social media research using Facebook and Reddit data which also found…”
BackgroundThe Social Determinants of Conspiratorial Ideation
DiGrazia, J. (2017) · Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World · doi:10.1177/2378023116689791 · Cited by 77
Unpacking the relationship between religiosity and conspiracy beliefs in Australia
Jasinskaja‐Lahti, I., & Jetten, J. (2019) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12314 · Cited by 80
Gillespie, A., Glăveanu, V. P., & Laurent, C. D. S. (2024) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009031066 · Cited by 120
Recursive patterns in online echo chambers
Brugnoli, E., Cinelli, M., Quattrociocchi, W., & Scala, A. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-56191-7 · Cited by 95
Taggart, P. A. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315108070-6 · Cited by 77
Paranoia with a purpose: conspiracy theory and political coalitions in Kyrgyzstan
Radnitz, S. (2015) · Post-Soviet Affairs · doi:10.1080/1060586x.2015.1090699 · Cited by 71
Conspiracies Online: User Discussions in a Conspiracy Community Following Dramatic Events
Samory, M., & Mitra, T. (2018) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v12i1.15039 · Cited by 67
“Conspiracy theories are attempts at offering alternative explanations to significant events by referencing to false or unsubstantiated claims (Sunstein and Vermeule 2009).”
BackgroundInfluentialBLINDED BY THE LIES? Toward an integrated definition of conspiracy theories
Baden, C., & Sharon, T. (2020) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1093/ct/qtaa023 · Cited by 71
Min, S. J. (2021) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x211013526 · Cited by 70
“Starting Hofstadter (1965), many scholars have argued that conservative-leaning conspiracy theories are historically more salient and longstanding than liberal-learning ones (e.g., Barreto et al., 2011; Benkler et al., 2018; Iyengar et al., 2008; Nam et al., 2013; Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009).”
BackgroundResultTopic Modeling Reveals Distinct Interests within an Online Conspiracy Forum
Klein, C., Clutton, P., & Polito, V. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00189 · Cited by 73
Song, Y., Kwon, K. H., Yin, L., Fan, Y., & Li, B. (2021) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/00027642211003153 · Cited by 70
“Unverifiable rumors like conspiracy theories can sometimes be more persistent, divisive, and impactful (Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009).”
BackgroundPsychometric assessment of the Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale
Drinkwater, K., Dagnall, N., Denovan, A., & Neave, N. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0230365 · Cited by 48
“For instance, Sunstein and Vermeule [1] define conspiracy theories as attempts to attribute outcomes to the scheming of powerful individuals, who attempt to conceal their involvement and activities.”
BackgroundCassam, Q. (2023) · Society · doi:10.1007/s12115-023-00816-1 · Cited by 68
Su, Y., Lee, D. K. L., Xiao, X., Li, W., & Shu, W. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106760 · Cited by 67
Online Conspiracy Groups: Micro-Bloggers, Bots, and Coronavirus Conspiracy Talk on Twitter
Greve, H. R., Rao, H., Vicinanza, P. J., & Zhou, E. Y. (2022) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/00031224221125937 · Cited by 74
“Sunstein and Vermeule (2009) trace conspiracy beliefs to information processing deficiencies, Elster (1998) discusses communication problems, Osmundsen and colleagues (2021) suggest political motives are prominent, and Uscinski and Parent (2014) argue that “conspiracy theories are for losers” of…”
Background'The Government Spies Using Our Webcams': The Language of Conspiracy Theories in Online Discussions
Samory, M., & Mitra, T. (2018) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3274421 · Cited by 74
“Emotional engagement helps to explain phenomena such as moral panics about deviant behavior [26, 61].”
BackgroundInfluentialMahl, D., Zeng, J., & Schäfer, M. S. (2021) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051211017482 · Cited by 81
“Second, conspiracy theories tend to remain confined to their communities (Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009) and not to spread haphazardly from person to person through social media (DeWitt et al., 2018).”
BackgroundLewandowsky, S., Cook, J., Oberauer, K., & Marriott, M. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00073 · Cited by 69
RetractedIntelligence and surprise attack: failure and success from Pearl Harbor to 9/11 and beyond
(2014) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.51-4693 · Cited by 65
Epistemic Bubbles and Authoritarian Politics
Anderson, E. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192893338.003.0002 · Cited by 66
The economy of attention in the age of (mis)information
Bessi, A., Scala, A., Rossi, L., Zhang, Q., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2014) · Journal of Trust Management · doi:10.1186/s40493-014-0012-y · Cited by 66
Fake news: When the dark side of persuasion takes over
Nyilasy, G. (2019) · International Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/02650487.2019.1586210 · Cited by 65
“…theories is associated with anger and helplessness (Butler, Koopman, and Zimbardo 1995), social isolation and closed as opposed to open societies (Sunstein and Vermeule 2009); existential threat (Newheiser, Farias, and Tausch 2011), lack of analytic thinking (Swami et al. 2014) and need for…”
BackgroundHarambam, J. (2021) · Journal for Cultural Research · doi:10.1080/14797585.2021.1886424 · Cited by 70
“…debunking efforts share similar assumptions: people have (for various reasons) no access to quality information and suffer as such from a ‘crippled epistemology’ (Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009), but if we show people the right information instead, then they will accept established (scientific) truths.”
Cookson, D., Jolley, D., Dempsey, R. C., & Povey, R. C. (2021) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430221993907 · Cited by 60
“Given that millions of people subscribe to these potentially harmful viewpoints (Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009), there needs to be a better understanding of the psychological mechanisms underlying why people believe in conspiracy theories.”
BackgroundWhom do you trust? Doubt and conspiracy theories in the 2009 influenza pandemic
Smallman, S. C. (2015) · Journal of International and Global Studies · doi:10.62608/2158-0669.1238 · Cited by 60
MacFarlane, D., Hurlstone, M. J., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2020) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112790 · Cited by 64
“debunking conspiracy theories is difficult not least because conspiratorial thinking: (i) has a “self-sealing nature”—the tendency to reject contrary evidence or refutation attempts as confirmation of the existence of an alleged nefarious plot; and (ii) thrives on the abundance of disconfirming evidence and the lack c…”
BackgroundDifferent types of COVID-19 misinformation have different emotional valence on Twitter
Charquero‐Ballester, M., Walter, J. G., Nissen, I. A., & Bechmann, A. (2021) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517211041279 · Cited by 67
“Furthermore, in general emotions contribute to the spreading of conspiracies (Samory and Mitra, 2018; Sunstein and Vermeule, 2009).”
BackgroundTransparency and mistrust: Who or what should be made transparent?
Roelofs, P. (2019) · Governance. An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions · doi:10.1111/gove.12402 · Cited by 49
“Despite the proliferation of data, the rise of conspiracy theories claiming to illuminate the hidden workings of power suggests that people find the activities of those in power less and less transparent (Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009).”
BackgroundWilhelm, C., Joeckel, S., & Ziegler, I. (2019) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650219855330 · Cited by 69
“Conspiracy theories aim to explain significant social or political events such as the refugee crisis or political practices as schemed by powerful elites who are trying to conceal their leading role, at least until they reach their goals (Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009).”
BackgroundMisinformation and Its Correction
Wittenberg, C., & Berinsky, A. J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.009 · Cited by 64
Juanchich, M., Sirota, M., Jolles, D., & Whiley, L. A. (2021) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2796 · Cited by 70
“Given that conspiracy theorists believe in powerful malevolent individuals (Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009) and have low trust in government and science (Lamberty & Imhoff, 2018), it was plausible to assume that advice from often villainised sources such as politicians and ‘big pharma’ could result in…”
BackgroundWho Believes in Conspiracy Theories in Great Britain and Europe?
Drochon, H. H. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0022 · Cited by 62
“” American Journal of Political Science 58(4): 952– 966.”
BackgroundCivil Society Must Be Defended: Misinformation, Moral Panics, and Wars of Restoration
Bratich, J. Z. (2019) · Communication Culture and Critique · doi:10.1093/ccc/tcz041 · Cited by 57
Iannelli, L., Giglietto, F., Rossi, L., & Zurovac, E. (2018) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/0894439318816638 · Cited by 55
“Supporters of conspiracy theories are hard-to-reach populations, given the distinctive self-sealing quality of their communities (Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009) and their high distrust of scientific institutions (Comu-nello, Mulargia, & Parisi, 2017).”
BackgroundConspiracies, Conspiracy Theories and Democracy
Moore, A. (2015) · Political Studies Review · doi:10.1111/1478-9302.12102 · Cited by 55
“They have been associated with group polarisation (Sunstein and Vermeule, 2009).”
BackgroundInfluentialConspiracy theories and social movements studies: A research agenda
Bertuzzi, N. (2021) · Sociology Compass · doi:10.1111/soc4.12945 · Cited by 65
Saunders, K. L. (2017) · Research & Politics · doi:10.1177/2053168017717602 · Cited by 55
Mistrust, uncertainty and health risks
Breakwell, G. M. (2020) · Contemporary Social Science · doi:10.1080/21582041.2020.1804070 · Cited by 63
How Believing Climate Change is a “Hoax” Shapes Climate Skepticism in the United States
Sarathchandra, D., & Haltinner, K. (2020) · Environmental Sociology · doi:10.1080/23251042.2020.1855884 · Cited by 57
“First, a conspiracy can recreate reality and shift the balance of power by creating a story that aligns with the adherent’s worldview (Nefes 2014; Sunstein and Vermeule 2009).”
BackgroundRationale of conspiracy theorizing: Who shot the President Chen Shui-bian?
Nefes, T. S. (2014) · Rationality and Society · doi:10.1177/1043463113519069 · Cited by 53
“A line of research follows Hofstadter’s labelling of the biased, value-laden and paranoid character of conspiracy theories as a political pathology (Aaronovitch, 2009; Ben-Itto, 2005; Cohn, 1970; Pipes, 1997; Robins and Post, 1997; Sunstein and Vermeule, 2009).”
BackgroundOswald, S., Lewiński, M., Greco, S., & Villata, S. (2022) · Argumentation library · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-91017-4 · Cited by 60
Harambam, J., & Aupers, S. (2019) · European Journal of Cultural Studies · doi:10.1177/1367549419886045 · Cited by 56
“(Academic) criticasters of conspiracy theorists may find this eclecticism problematic: they deplore how such ‘charlatans’ unsettle the boundaries between fact and fiction and warn for the societal ramifications of such relativism (e.g. Barkun, 2006; Pipes, 1997; Sunstein and Vermeule, 2009).”
BackgroundDehghan, E., & Nagappa, A. (2022) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051221113075 · Cited by 40
“…to an alternative ecosystem, in which information is produced by “dark participants” (Zeng & Schäfer, 2021, p. 1338) and “conspiracy entrepreneurs” (Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009, p. 212), shared and amplified by ordinary users, and then posted on the mainstream platforms to recruit new members.”
BackgroundJia, H., & Luo, X. (2021) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2021.1958982 · Cited by 53
“This is defined as an attempt to normalize explanations of a significant political or social event as a secret plot by influential individuals or organizations (Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009).”
BackgroundMashuri, A., & Esti Zaduqisti, C. (2013) · International Journal of Research Studies in Psychology · doi:10.5861/ijrsp.2013.446 · Cited by 50
Conspiracy and Conspiracy Theories in Democratic Politics
Moore, A. (2016) · Critical Review · doi:10.1080/08913811.2016.1178894 · Cited by 50
Kay, C. S. (2021) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2021.104128 · Cited by 58
“Gender ideology” and the discursive infrastructure of a transnational conspiracy theory
Zottola, A., & Borba, R. (2022) · Discourse approaches to politics, society and culture · doi:10.1075/dapsac.98.20zot · Cited by 50
Statistical Bias and Endorsement of Conspiracy Theories
Dagnall, N., Denovan, A., Drinkwater, K. G., Parker, A., & Clough, P. (2017) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3331 · Cited by 48
“Despite this, there remains no single, commonly recognised definition of conspiracy (Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009).”
BackgroundAghajari, Z., Baumer, E. P. S., & DiFranzo, D. J. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3579520 · Cited by 57
“4, people’s response to misinformation is influenced by different factors, including the social context in which they encounter misinformation and the ways others within a community engage with and respond to misinformation [70, 144, 195, 231].”
BackgroundConspiracist beliefs, intuitive thinking, and schizotypal facets: A further evaluation
Denovan, A., Dagnall, N., Drinkwater, K., Parker, A., & Neave, N. (2020) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3716 · Cited by 34
“These emphasise secrecy, subterfuge, and manipulation, which manifest as the conviction that powerful groups or collectives clandestinely plan and implement strategies with the intention of achieving malevolent goals (Bale, 2007; Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009).”
BackgroundHughes, J. P., Efstratiou, A., Komer, S. R., Baxter, L. A., Vasiljevic, M., & Leite, A. C. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0263716 · Cited by 53
“The extant literature on the relationship between government distrust and belief in conspiracy theories points to the idea that government guidelines are not viewed as an attempt to protect the public by conspiracy theory advocates, but rather, an attempt to restrict individual freedoms and liberties [29].”
BackgroundExpertise and Conspiracy Theories
Dentith, M. R. X. (2018) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2018.1440021 · Cited by 48
Wang, C., & Huang, H. (2020) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414020957672 · Cited by 47
“…that can provide independent information and fact-checking means not only that rumors and speculation are particularly prevalent (Kapferer, 1990; Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009), but also that the authorities are more tempted to use the “fake news” label to suppress discordant voices, criticism, or…”
BackgroundClassified or Coverup? The Effect of Redactions on Conspiracy Theory Beliefs
Nyhan, B. J., Dickinson, F., Dudding, S., Dylgjeri, E., Neiley, E., Pullerits, C., Seog, M., Simpson, A., Szilagyi, H., & Walmsley, C. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Political Science · doi:10.1017/xps.2015.21 · Cited by 46
On the statistical properties of viral misinformation in online social media
Bessi, A. (2016) · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2016.11.012 · Cited by 46
“Finally, we are able to derive the predictive posterior probability distribution of the number of posts exceeding a certain threshold of shares over a finite interval of time.”
MethodWhat Makes People Join Conspiracy Communities?
Phadke, S., Samory, M., & Mitra, T. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3432922 · Cited by 77
Social Determinants of Content Selection in the Age of (Mis)Information
Bessi, A., Caldarelli, G., Vicario, M. D., Scala, A., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-13734-6_18 · Cited by 46
Cepollaro, B., Lepoutre, M., & Simpson, R. M. (2022) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.12890 · Cited by 47
“More prosaically, some harmful speech happens in communicative spaces that are simply hard to access and engage with (Sunstein and Vermeule 2009).”
BackgroundIs democracy under threat? Why belief in conspiracy theories predicts autocratic attitudes
Papaioannou, K., Pantazi, M., & van Prooijen, J. (2023) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2939 · Cited by 39
Why Do People Discriminate against Jews?
Fox, J., & Topor, L. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197580349.001.0001 · Cited by 43
Palau-Sampio, D. (2022) · Journalism Practice · doi:10.1080/17512786.2022.2126992 · Cited by 43
“Although manipulation, rumours or conspiracy theories have run through the history of mankind (Sunstein and Vermeule 2009; Cooke 2017; Tandoc, Lim, and Ling 2018), recent political events (i.e., the Brexit referendum, the 2016 US Presidential Election) and particularly the COVID-19 pandemic and its…”
BackgroundZia‐Ebrahimi, R. (2018) · Patterns of Prejudice · doi:10.1080/0031322x.2018.1493876 · Cited by 43
de Oliveira, T. M. (2020) · Fronteiras - estudos midiáticos · doi:10.4013/fem.2020.221.03 · Cited by 44
Does deliberation decrease belief in conspiracies?Preprint
Bagó, B., Rand, D. G., & Pennycook, G. (2022) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104395 · Cited by 52
Just world beliefs, personal success and beliefs in conspiracy theories
Furnham, A. F. (2021) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-021-01576-z · Cited by 44
Ren, Z., Carton, A. M., Dimant, E., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2022) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101388 · Cited by 42
Regulatory Focus and Conspiratorial Perceptions: The Importance of Personal Control
Whitson, J., Kim, J., Wang, C. S., Menon, T., & Webster, B. D. (2018) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167218775070 · Cited by 40
Conspiracy theories and reasonable pluralism
Cíbik, M., & Hardoš, P. (2020) · European Journal of Political Theory · doi:10.1177/1474885119899232 · Cited by 42
“…as such’, ‘whereby government agents or their allies [. . .] will undermine the crippled epistemology of believers by planting doubts about the theories and stylised facts that circulate within such groups, thereby introducing beneficial cognitive diversity’ (Sunstein and Vermeule, 2009: 219).”
BackgroundBreast Cancer Prevention and Treatment: Misinformation on Pinterest, 2018
Wilner, T., & Holton, A. E. (2020) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2020.305812 · Cited by 42
Through the Newsfeed Glass: Rethinking Filter Bubbles and Echo Chambers
Figà Talamanca, G., & Arfini, S. (2022) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-021-00494-z · Cited by 41
“Specifically, we will discuss its relation to the notion of echo chamber (Sunstein, 2001; Sunstein and Vermeule 2009) and we will argue that both insufficiently provide explanations for the phenomena they aim to account for since there is a lack of empirical evidence that supports them and, they…”
BackgroundGjoneska, B. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.736838 · Cited by 46
Soto-Vásquez, A. D., & Sanchez-Santos, M. (2022) · Culture Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies · doi:10.1177/15327086221093949 · Cited by 41
“Zamna is a conspiracy influencer who is entrepreneurial, using disinformation to gain followers and promote his brand (Vermeule & Sunstein, 2009).”
BackgroundBeyond belief: How social engagement motives influence the spread of conspiracy theories
Ren, Z., Dimant, E., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104421 · Cited by 72
Giuliani, M., Ichino, A., Bonomi, A., Martoni, R. M., Cammino, S., & Gorini, A. (2021) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines9080810 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Sunstein, C. R., & Vermeule, A.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Political Philosophy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-04-13
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 202-227
- ISSN
- 0963-8016 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9760
- OpenAlex
- W2009369609
- Cited by
- 1,050
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 92 · 2025: 90 · 2024: 98 · 2023: 109 · 2022: 161 · 2021: 107 · 2020: 102 · 2019: 78 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 2.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- nrs.harvard.edu
- Locations
- Journal of Political Philosophy (publishedVersion)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
- Keywords
- conspiracy theories, 9/11 conspiracy theories, cognitive errors, epistemology, misinformation, extremist groups, countering disinformation, public policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review