Cited by 95Skin Protection and AgingGinkgo biloba and Cashew ApplicationsMedicinal Plant Research

Clinical efficacy comparison of anti-wrinkle cosmetics containing herbal flavonoids

Chuarienthong, P., Lourith, N., Leelapornpisid, P.·2010·International Journal of Cosmetic Science

Abstract

Herbal anti-wrinkle cosmetics were formulated from ginkgo (Ginkgo biloba), a mixture of tea and rooibos (Camellia sinensis and Aspalathus linearis) and soybean (Glycine soja). These extracts were incorporated into the preliminary developed stable gel base with good preference. The gingko formulation was found to be more stable than the formula containing a mixture of tea and rooibos and the soybean formula. Clinical efficacies of the ginkgo formula and the formula containing a mixture of tea and rooibos were compared following 28 days of application. The ginkgo preparation increased skin moisturization (27.88%) and smoothness (4.32%) and reduced roughness (0.4%) and wrinkles (4.63%), whereas the formula containing tea and rooibos showed the best efficacy on wrinkle reduction (9.9%). In comparison to the tea and rooibos formula, gingko significantly improved skin moisturization (P = 0.05).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-2494.2010.00522.x

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Plant polyphenols are considered important substances for skin function, with hydrating, smoothing, softening, soothing and astringent effects.

    “Plant polyphenols are considered important substances for skin function, with hydrating, smoothing, softening, soothing and astringent effects [25,190,193,197,198,199].”

    From Bioactive Compounds for Skin Health: A Review (2021) · cites this paper as [199]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chuarienthong, P., Lourith, N., & Leelapornpisid, P.
Affiliations
  • Mae Fah Luang University (TH)
  • Chiang Mai University (TH)
Corresponding author
Lourith, N.
Venue
International Journal of Cosmetic Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-03-03
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
99-106
ISSN
  • 0142-5463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2494
OpenAlex
W2084746719
Cited by
95
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Cosmetic Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Ginkgo biloba and Cashew Applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Medicinal Plant Research
Keywords
anti-wrinkle cosmetics, herbal cosmetics, Ginkgo biloba extract, tea extract, rooibos, Aspalathus linearis, soybean extract, Glycine soja, flavonoids, skin hydration, skin smoothness, skin roughness, wrinkle reduction, cosmetic stability, gel base
MeSH terms
Adult, Consumer Behavior, Cosmetics, Female, Flavonoids, Humans, Middle Aged, Plant Extracts, Surveys and Questionnaires, Skin Aging, Single-Blind Method

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review