Cited by 104Probiotics and Fermented FoodsSepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentInfective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management

Lactobacillus rhamnosus administration causes sepsis in a cardiosurgical patient—is the time right to revise probiotic safety guidelines?

Open access
Kochan, P., Chmielarczyk, A., Szymaniak, L., Brykczynski, M., Galant, K., Zych, A., Pakosz, K., Giedrys-Kalemba, S. +2 more·2011·Clinical Microbiology and Infection

Abstract

A 24-year-old female patient developed sepsis resulting from preoperative administration of probiotics following an aortic valve replacement. Blood cultures revealed the causative agent to be the probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus, which has recently been implicated as an emerging aetiology of infection in those taking probiotics. In the past few years, probiotic use in hospitals has increased greatly. However, there is growing global evidence that the use of probiotics in patients with organ failure, immunocompromised status and dysfunctional gut barrier mechanisms can cause infections. This and other reports show the importance of establishing generally recognized safety guidelines.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03614.x

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several independent meta-analyses concluded that elevated TMAO is prognostic for cardiovascular events or mortality, independent of renal function and cardiovascular comorbidities.

    “Most recently, several independent meta-analyses arrived at similar conclusions of elevated TMAO being prognostic for cardiovascular events or mortality, independent of renal function and cardiovascular comorbidities206–208.”

    From Dietary metabolism, the gut microbiome, and heart failure (2019) · cites this paper as [206]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kochan, P., Chmielarczyk, A., Szymaniak, L., Brykczynski, M., Galant, K., Zych, A., Pakosz, K., Giedrys-Kalemba, S., Lenouvel, E., & Heczko, P. B.
Affiliations
Jagiellonian University (PL)
Corresponding author
Kochan, P.
Venue
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-10
Volume
17
Issue
10
Pages
1589-1592
ISSN
1198-743X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1625667749
Cited by
104
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
6.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Microbiology and Infection (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Homo Politicus (Academy of Humanities and Economics in Lodz) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
Lactobacillus rhamnosus, probiotic safety, aortic valve replacement, cardiac surgery, immunocompromised patients
MeSH terms
Adult, Aortic Valve, Female, Genotype, Hospitals, Humans, Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field, Sepsis, Probiotics, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review