Cited by 265Probiotics and Fermented FoodsInfant Nutrition and HealthGut microbiota and health

Safety of probiotics: translocation and infection: Nutrition Reviews©, Vol. 66, No. 4

Liong, Min-Tze·2008·Nutrition Reviews

Abstract

The long history of safety has contributed to the acceptance of probiotics as a safe food adjunct. Consequently, many probiotic products and their applications have been granted GRAS (generally regarded as safe) status. However, this classification has been frequently generalized for all probiotic strains regardless of their application. Cases of probiotics from the genera Lactobacillus, Leuconostoc, Pediococcus, Enterococcus, and Bifidobacterium have been isolated from infection sites, leading to the postulation that these probiotics can translocate. Probiotic translocation is difficult to induce in healthy humans, and even if it does occur, detrimental effects are rare. Despite this, various reports have documented health-damaging effects of probiotic translocation in immunocompromised patients. Due to probiotics' high degree of safety and their morphological confusion with other pathogenic bacteria, they are often overlooked as contaminants and are least suspected as pathogens. However, the antibiotic resistance of some strains has increased the complexity of their eradication. Probiotic translocation and infection deserve further investigation and should become a facet of safety assessment so the negative effects of probiotics do not outweigh the benefits.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2008.00024.x

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several independent meta-analyses concluded that elevated TMAO is prognostic for cardiovascular events or mortality, independent of renal function and cardiovascular comorbidities.

    “Most recently, several independent meta-analyses arrived at similar conclusions of elevated TMAO being prognostic for cardiovascular events or mortality, independent of renal function and cardiovascular comorbidities206–208.”

    From Dietary metabolism, the gut microbiome, and heart failure (2019) · cites this paper as [207]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liong, M.-T.
Affiliations
Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY)
Corresponding author
Liong, Min-Tze
Venue
Nutrition Reviews
Published
2008-03-26
Volume
66
Issue
4
Pages
192-202
ISSN
0029-6643 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2135866777
Cited by
265
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 16
FWCI
2.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nutrition Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
Keywords
probiotics, probiotic safety, Lactobacillus, Leuconostoc, Pediococcus, Enterococcus, Bifidobacterium, immunocompromised patients, antibiotic resistance, food contaminants, GRAS status, safety assessment
MeSH terms
Bacterial Infections, Bifidobacterium, Humans, Lactobacillus, Pediococcus, Safety, Immunocompromised Host, Enterococcus, Infection Control, Risk Assessment, Bacterial Translocation, Probiotics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review