Cited by 87Probiotics and Fermented FoodsGut microbiota and healthInfant Nutrition and Health

The development of probiotic treatment in obesity: a review

Open access
Mekkes, M.C., Weenen, T.C., Brummer, R.J., Claassen, E.·2014·Beneficial Microbes

Abstract

Recent studies suggested that manipulation of the composition of the microbial ecosystem in the gut might be a novel approach in the treatment of obesity. Such treatment might consist of altering the composition of the microbial communities of an obese individual by administration of beneficial microorganisms, commonly known as probiotics. Here, we intend to contribute to the developmental process of probiotic treatment of human obesity. The aim is to review the evidence regarding the potential effect of probiotic strains on reduction of weight and body fat. A literature study was conducted focusing on clinical trials that examined the effect of specific microorganisms on body weight control. Analysis of the eligible articles pointed out that Lactobacillus gasseri SBT 2055, Lactobacillus rhamnosus ATCC 53103, and the combination of L. rhamnosus ATCC 53102 and Bifidobacterium lactis Bb12 may reduce adiposity, body weight, and weight gain. This suggests that these microbial strains can be applied in the treatment of obesity. Furthermore, short chain fatty acid production and low grade inflammation were found as the underlying mechanisms of action that influence metabolism and affect body weight. These findings might contribute to the development of probiotic treatment of obesity. Further research should be directed to the most effective combination and dosage rate of probiotic microorganisms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3920/bm2012.0069

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mekkes, M. C., Weenen, T. C., Brummer, R. J., & Claassen, E.
Affiliations
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • Örebro University (SE)
Venue
Beneficial Microbes
Published
2014-03-01
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
19-28
ISSN
  • 1876-2883 (ISSN-L)
  • 1876-2891
OpenAlex
W1967724197
Cited by
87
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Beneficial Microbes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
Keywords
probiotics, obesity, gut microbiota, Lactobacillus gasseri, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis, weight loss, adiposity, short-chain fatty acids, low-grade inflammation, weight gain prevention, probiotic dosage
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Bifidobacterium, Body Weight, Fatty Acids, Volatile, Humans, Inflammation, Lactobacillus, Obesity, Weight Loss, Probiotics, Gastrointestinal Tract, Adiposity, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review