Cited by 41Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

AD/HD and the capture of attention by briefly exposed delay‐related cues: evidence from a conditioning paradigm

Sonuga‐Barke, Edmund J.S., Houwer, Jan De, Ruiter, Karen De, Ajzenstzen, Michal, Holland, Sarah·2004·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The selective attention of children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (AD/HD) to briefly exposed delay-related cues was examined in two experiments using a dot-probe conditioning paradigm. METHOD: Colour cues were paired with negatively (i.e., imposition of delay) and positively valenced cues (i.e., escape from or avoidance of delay) during a conditioning phase. These cues were presented alongside neutral cues in a subsequent dot-probe detection phase. RESULTS: In experiment 1 teacher-identified children with AD/HD (N = 12), but not controls (N = 12), displayed an attentional bias towards both positively and negatively valenced cues. In experiment 2 children with a diagnosis of hyperkinetic disorder (N = 15), but not controls (N = 15), displayed a bias towards delay-related cues. However, this effect was largely carried by the response to positively valenced cues. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm the dot-probe conditioning paradigm as a useful test of motivational influence on attention. They provide the first evidence of qualitative differences in the attentional style of children with AD/HD and give further support to those theories that highlight the motivational significance of delay in AD/HD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00219.x

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sonuga‐Barke, E. J. S., Houwer, J. D., Ruiter, K. D., Ajzenstzen, M., & Holland, S.
Affiliations
University of Southampton (GB)
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-01-22
Volume
45
Issue
2
Pages
274-283
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W2148799556
Cited by
41
References
13
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, hyperkinetic disorder, attentional bias, attentional style, delay aversion, escape motivation, children
MeSH terms
Attention, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Conditioning, Psychological, Cues, Female, Humans, Male, Motivation, Reaction Time, Time Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review