Cited by 263Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchBehavioral and Psychological StudiesChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

A two‐year prospective follow‐up study of community‐based early intensive behavioural intervention and specialist nursery provision for children with autism spectrum disorders

Magiati, Iliana, Charman, Tony, Howlin, Patricia·2007·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: This prospective study compared outcome for pre‐school children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) receiving autism‐specific nursery provision or home‐based Early Intensive Behavioural Interventions (EIBI) in a community setting. Methods: Forty‐four 23‐ to 53‐month‐old children with ASD participated (28 in EIBI home‐based programmes; 16 in autism‐specific nurseries). Cognitive, language, play, adaptive behaviour skills and severity of autism were assessed at intake and 2 years later. Results: Both groups showed improvements in age equivalent scores but standard scores changed little over time. At follow‐up, there were no significant group differences in cognitive ability, language, play or severity of autism. The only difference approaching significance ( p = .06), in favour of the EIBI group, was for Vineland Daily Living Skills standard scores. However, there were large individual differences in progress, with intake IQ and language level best predicting overall progress. Conclusions: Home‐based EIBI, as implemented in the community, and autism‐specific nursery provision produced comparable outcomes after two years of intervention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01756.x

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Magiati, I., Charman, T., & Howlin, P.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Magiati, Iliana
  • Howlin, Patricia
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-08
Volume
48
Issue
8
Pages
803-812
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W2094543961
Cited by
263
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 23
FWCI
7.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, home-based intervention, preschool children, adaptive behavior, language development, cognitive development, autism severity
MeSH terms
Autistic Disorder, Behavior Therapy, Child Behavior, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Community Health Services, Female, Follow-Up Studies, United Kingdom, Humans, Infant, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Schools, Nursery, Severity of Illness Index, Social Behavior, Socialization, Early Intervention, Educational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review