Cited by 198Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesStress Responses and CortisolPersonality Traits and Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neuroticism is associated with larger and more prolonged electrodermal responses to emotionally evocative pictures

Open access

Abstract

Elevated neuroticism is associated with increased psychological reactivity to stressors. Research on individual differences and physiological reactivity (e.g., electrodermal activity), however, has focused on clinical samples and measures of basal activity (e.g., nonspecific skin conductance responses) or responses to nonaffective stimuli. Surprisingly, there is a dearth of work on physiological reactivity to emotional stimuli as a function of neuroticism. Thus, the authors sought to examine the relationship between neuroticism and skin conductance reactivity to emotionally evocative pictures in a nonclinical sample. Individuals higher in neuroticism exhibited both greater skin conductance reactivity to emotional (and particularly aversive) pictures as well as more extended reactivity than did emotionally stable individuals. Implications for health are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00551.x

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Cacioppo J. T., 2000, Handbook of emotions, 173
  2. Dawson M. E., 2000, Handbook of psychophysiology, 200
  3. Lang P. J., 1999, International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Digitized photographs, instruction manual and affective ratings

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 198

Metadata

Authors
Norris, C. J., Larsen, J. T., & Cacioppo, J. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Texas Tech University (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Norris, Catherine J.
Venue
Psychophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-06-26
Volume
44
Issue
5
Pages
823-826
ISSN
  • 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8986
OpenAlex
W2133017516
Cited by
198
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (P50 MH-72850, P50MH072850)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
neuroticism, electrodermal activity, emotional stimuli, emotional reactivity, individual differences, stress reactivity, non-clinical sample
MeSH terms
Adult, Emotions, Extraversion, Psychological, Female, Galvanic Skin Response, Humans, Neurotic Disorders, Personality Tests, Photic Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review