Cited by 135Stress Responses and CortisolHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Positive affect is associated with cardiovascular reactivity, norepinephrine level, and morning rise in salivary cortisol

Open access
Brummett, B. H., Boyle, S. H., Kuhn, C. M., Siegler, I. C., Williams, R. B.·2009·Psychophysiology

Abstract

Positive affect was examined as a predictor of (1) cardiovascular reactivity during a sadness and an anger recall task and recovery following the protocol, (2) epinephrine (EPI) and norepinephrine (NOREPI) reactivity and level during the recall protocol, and (3) the diurnal pattern of salivary cortisol. Sample was 328 individuals. Negative affect, age, race, sex, smoking status, income, and BMI were adjusted. During sadness recall, positive affect was inversely related to systolic blood pressure (p=.007) and diastolic blood pressure (p=.049) reactivity, and unrelated to heart rate (p=.226). Positive affect was unrelated to reactivity during anger recall (p s>.19), and was unrelated to recovery at the end of the recall protocol. Positive affect was inversely related to the mean level of NOREPI (p=.046), and unrelated to EPI (p=.149). Positive affect was inversely related to the increase in cortisol 30 min post awakening (p=.042), and unrelated to the evening decline in cortisol levels (p=.174). Positive emotions may be relevant to good health.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00829.x

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Positive psychological factors, including the capacity to regulate emotions effectively, are associated with and plausibly mechanistically responsible for healthier basal levels of autonomic parameters such as heart rate and heart rate variability, greater vagal tone, and healthier biological stress responses.

    “Positive psychological factors, including the capacity to regulate emotions effectively, are associated with and plausibly mechanistically responsible for healthier basal levels of autonomic parameters such as heart rate and heart rate variability, greater vagal tone, and healthier biological stress responses. 126-131”

    From Psychological Health, Well-Being, and the Mind-Heart-Body Connection: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2021) · cites this paper as [129]

    The Discussion reports lower blood-pressure reactivity during sadness recall among people with higher positive affect, and the Results > Cortisol section reports a smaller morning cortisol rise. These support part of the claim about biological stress responses. The paper does not establish healthier basal heart rate or heart-rate variability, greater vagal tone, or effective emotion regulation; its proposed biological mechanisms remain speculative. Our copy provides no page numbers for these sections. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [3]Sanderman R Ranchor AV The predictor status of personality variables: Etiological significance and their role in the course of disease European Journal of Personality 1997 11 359 382
  2. [20]Frijda NH The emotions 1986 Cambridge University Press Cambridge: UK

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brummett, B. H., Boyle, S. H., Kuhn, C. M., Siegler, I. C., & Williams, R. B.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Brummett, B. H.
Venue
Psychophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-06-09
Volume
46
Issue
4
Pages
862-869
ISSN
  • 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8986
OpenAlex
W2068048657
Cited by
134
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (P01HL036587, HL036587)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01RR30L)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
positive affect, cardiovascular reactivity, norepinephrine, epinephrine, salivary cortisol, diurnal cortisol rhythm, blood pressure, heart rate, emotional reactivity
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Circadian Rhythm, Female, Hemodynamics, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male, Norepinephrine, Saliva, Socioeconomic Factors, Body Mass Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review