Cited by 222

Dicer and eIF2c are enriched at postsynaptic densities in adult mouse brain and are modified by neuronal activity in a calpain-dependent manner

Lugli, Giovanni, Larson, John, Martone, Maryann E., Jones, Ying, Smalheiser, Neil R.·2005·Journal of Neurochemistry

Abstract

We have hypothesized that small RNAs may participate in learning and memory mechanisms. Because dendritic spines are important in synaptic plasticity and learning, we asked whether dicer, the rate‐limiting enzyme in the formation of small RNAs, is enriched within dendritic spines. In adult mouse brain, dicer and the RNA‐induced silencing complex (RISC) component eIF2c were expressed in the somatodendritic compartment of principal neurons and some interneurons in many regions, and dicer was enriched in dendritic spines and postsynaptic densities (PSDs). A portion of dicer and eIF2c were associated with each other and with fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP), as assessed by co‐immunoprecipitation. Calpain I treatment of recombinant dicer or immunopurified brain dicer caused a marked increase in RNAse III activity. Purified PSDs did not exhibit RNAse III activity, but calpain caused release of dicer from PSDs in an enzymatically active form, together with eIF2c. NMDA stimulation of hippocampal slices, or calcium treatment of synaptoneurosomes, caused a 75 kDa dicer fragment to appear in a calpain‐dependent manner. The findings support a model whereby acute neuronal stimulation at excitatory synapses increases intracellular calcium, which activates calpain, which liberates dicer and eIF2c bound to PSDs. This supports the hypothesis that dicer could be involved in synaptic plasticity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03224.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • miRAP should capture miRNAs in neurites because AGO2 localizes in dendrites and tAGO2 signal can be detected in dendrites.

    “miRAP, on the other hand, should capture miRNAs in neurites since AGO2 has been shown to localize in dendtrites (Cougot et al., 2008, Lugli et al., 2005) and tAGO2 signal can be detected in dendrites (Figure 3).”

    From Cell-Type-Based Analysis of MicroRNA Profiles in the Mouse Brain (2012) · cites this paper as Lugli et al., 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lugli, G., Larson, J., Martone, M. E., Jones, Y., & Smalheiser, N. R.
Venue
Journal of Neurochemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-06-30
Volume
94
Issue
4
Pages
896-905
ISSN
  • 0022-3042
  • 1471-4159
Cited by
222
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review