Cited by 72

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Enhanced episodic‐like memory and kindling epilepsy in a rat model of tuberous sclerosis

Waltereit, Robert, Welzl, Hans, Dichgans, Johannes, Lipp, Hans‐Peter, Schmidt, Werner J., Weller, Michael·2006·Journal of Neurochemistry

Abstract

Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is a common neurological autosomal‐dominant syndrome caused by mutations in the TSC1 or TSC2 genes. TSC starts in early childhood and is characterized by cerebral hamartomas (benign tumours), severe epilepsy and cognitive deficits such as mental retardation and autism. The hamartomas are characterized by loss of the remaining wild‐type TSC allele, and clinical data implicate cerebral hamartomas in the generation of epileptic seizures, which may play a significant role in the development of mental retardation. The TSC2 mutation predicts alterations in mitogen‐associated protein kinase (MAPK) and, together with the TSC1 mutation, in mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signalling pathways. Both pathways are involved in neuronal plasticity. We therefore hypothesized that the heterozygous mutation itself, besides cerebral hamartomas, contributes to the pathogenesis of cognitive deficits and possibly also epilepsy. Here, we show that young adult TSC2+/– rats, which are virtually free of cerebral hamartomas, exhibit enhanced episodic‐like memory and enhanced responses to chemically‐induced kindling. The activation of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) in the hippocampus results in stronger induction of phospho‐p42‐MAPK in TSC2+/– rats than in wild‐type animals. Thus, the cognitive phenotype and, possibly, epilepsy in TSC patients may result not only from the focal hamartomatous lesions but also, from altered neuronal plasticity in the heterozygous tissue.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03538.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. 10.1016/0166-2236(90)90135-W · DOI
  2. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81653-0 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/S0166-4328(96)00160-X · DOI
  4. Davis S., 1992, The NMDA receptor antagonist D‐2‐amino‐5‐phosphonopentanoate (D‐AP5) impairs spatial learning and LTP in vivo at intracerebral concentrations comparable to those that block LTP in vitro, J. Neurosci., 12, 21, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-01-00021.1992 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/S0959-4388(03)00076-X · DOI
  6. 10.1038/189858b0 · DOI
  7. Gomez M. R., 1999, The Tuberous Sclerosis Complex
  8. 10.1038/ng0294-193 · DOI
  9. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-3277 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2003.11.007 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1017/S0033291702007092 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1074/jbc.M402591200 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00115-1 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/0166-4328(94)00156-A · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S0969-9961(03)00127-X · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.tibs.2003.09.003 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80987-3 · DOI
  18. 10.1093/jnen/59.3.188 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00404-5 · DOI
  20. 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2002.02100.x · DOI
  21. 10.1016/0013-4694(72)90177-0 · DOI
  22. 10.1073/pnas.95.26.15629 · DOI
  23. 10.1177/08830738040190091401 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63897-7 · DOI
  25. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1990.tb04595.x · DOI
  26. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1063(1999)9:2<118::AID-HIPO4>3.0.CO;2-8 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2004.07.001 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.conb.2004.04.001 · DOI
  29. 10.1073/pnas.012605299 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1177/08830738040190090801 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80184-1 · DOI
  32. 10.1385/MN:27:1:99 · DOI
  33. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-15-05484.2001 · DOI
  34. 10.1007/s00401-004-0865-8 · DOI
  35. 10.1074/jbc.270.27.16409 · DOI
  36. 10.2174/1566524043359791 · DOI
  37. 10.1073/pnas.91.24.11413 · DOI
  38. 10.1152/ajprenal.00234.2003 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 72

Metadata

Authors
Waltereit, R., Welzl, H., Dichgans, J., Lipp, H., Schmidt, W. J., & Weller, M.
Venue
Journal of Neurochemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-11-21
Volume
96
Issue
2
Pages
407-413
ISSN
  • 0022-3042
  • 1471-4159
Cited by
72
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review