The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Augmented reality in urban places: contested content and the duplicity of code
Open accessAbstract
With the increasing prevalence of both geographically referenced information and the code through which it is regulated, digital augmentations of place will become increasingly important in everyday, lived geographies. Through two detailed explorations of ‘augmented realities’, this paper provides a broad overview of not only the ways that those augmented realities matter, but also the complex and often duplicitous manner that code and content can congeal in our experiences of augmented places. Because the re‐makings of our spatial experiences and interactions are increasingly influenced through the ways in which content and code are fixed, ordered, stabilised and contested, this paper places a focus on how power, as mediated through technological artefacts, code and content, helps to produce place. Specifically, it demonstrates there are four key ways in which power is manifested in augmented realities: two performed largely by social actors, distributed power and communication power; and two enacted primarily via software, code power and timeless power. The paper concludes by calling for redoubled attention to both the layerings of content and the duplicity and ephemerality of code in shaping the uneven and power‐laden practices of representations and the experiences of place augmentations in urban places.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography
Goodchild, M. F. (2007) · GeoJournal · doi:10.1007/s10708-007-9111-y · Cited by 4,522
Production, Consumption, Prosumption: The nature of capitalism in the age of the digital ‘prosumer’
Ritzer, G., & Jurgenson, N. (2010) · Journal of Consumer Culture · doi:10.1177/1469540509354673 · Cited by 2,075
HARLEY, J. B. (1989) · Cartographica · doi:10.3138/e635-7827-1757-9t53 · Cited by 1,366
Allen, J. (2003) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470773321 · Cited by 942
Elwood, S., Goodchild, M. F., & Sui, D. Z. (2012) · Annals of the Association of American Geographers · doi:10.1080/00045608.2011.595657 · Cited by 863
WHOSE WOODS ARE THESE? COUNTER‐MAPPING FOREST TERRITORIES IN KALIMANTAN, INDONESIA
Peluso, N. L. (1995) · Antipode · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.1995.tb00286.x · Cited by 779
Kitchin, R., & Dodge, M. (2007) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132507077082 · Cited by 586
Maps as social constructions: power, communication and visualization
Crampton, J. W. (2001) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1191/030913201678580494 · Cited by 539
Prospect, Perspective and the Evolution of the Landscape Idea
Cosgrove, D. (1985) · Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers · doi:10.2307/622249 · Cited by 536
Graham, S. D. N. (2005) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1191/0309132505ph568oa · Cited by 489
Cited by
Enabling smart retail settings via mobile augmented reality shopping apps
Dacko, S. G. (2017) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.09.032 · Cited by 543
Newlands, G. (2021) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840620937900 · Cited by 439
Mapping the data shadows of Hurricane Sandy: Uncovering the sociospatial dimensions of ‘big data’
Shelton, T., Poorthuis, A., Graham, M., & Zook, M. (2014) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.01.006 · Cited by 256
Self-citationCultural heritage, tourist attractiveness and augmented reality: insights from Italy
Graziano, T., & Privitera, D. (2020) · Journal of Heritage Tourism · doi:10.1080/1743873x.2020.1719116 · Cited by 89
Seeing the street through Instagram. Digital platforms and the amplification of gentrification
Bronsvoort, I., & Uitermark, J. L. (2022) · Urban Studies · doi:10.1177/00420980211046539 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Graham, M., Zook, M., & Boulton, A.
- Venue
- Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-08-10
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 464-479
- ISSN
- 0020-2754 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-5661
- OpenAlex
- W2152379777
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 150.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Augmented reality in urban places: contested content and the duplicity of code. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00539.x
- The paper
- Graham, M., Zook, M., & Boulton, A. (2013). Augmented reality in urban places: contested content and the duplicity of code. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00539.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.