Cited by 193Rangeland and Wildlife ManagementWildlife Ecology and ConservationConservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education

The ecological future of the North American bison: conceiving long-term, large-scale conservation of wildlife

SANDERSON, ERIC W., REDFORD, KENT H., WEBER, BILL, AUNE, KEITH, BALDES, DICK, BERGER, JOEL, CARTER, DAVE, CURTIN, CHARLES +20 more·2008·Conservation Biology

Abstract

Many wide-ranging mammal species have experienced significant declines over the last 200 years; restoring these species will require long-term, large-scale recovery efforts. We highlight 5 attributes of a recent range-wide vision-setting exercise for ecological recovery of the North American bison (Bison bison) that are broadly applicable to other species and restoration targets. The result of the exercise, the "Vermejo Statement" on bison restoration, is explicitly (1) large scale, (2) long term, (3) inclusive, (4) fulfilling of different values, and (5) ambitious. It reads, in part, "Over the next century, the ecological recovery of the North American bison will occur when multiple large herds move freely across extensive landscapes within all major habitats of their historic range, interacting in ecologically significant ways with the fullest possible set of other native species, and inspiring, sustaining and connecting human cultures." We refined the vision into a scorecard that illustrates how individual bison herds can contribute to the vision. We also developed a set of maps and analyzed the current and potential future distributions of bison on the basis of expert assessment. Although more than 500,000 bison exist in North America today, we estimated they occupy <1% of their historical range and in no place express the full range of ecological and social values of previous times. By formulating an inclusive, affirmative, and specific vision through consultation with a wide range of stakeholders, we hope to provide a foundation for conservation of bison, and other wide-ranging species, over the next 100 years.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00899.x

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
SANDERSON, E. W., REDFORD, K. H., WEBER, B., AUNE, K., BALDES, D., BERGER, J., CARTER, D., CURTIN, C., DERR, J., DOBROTT, S., FEARN, E., FLEENER, C., FORREST, S., GERLACH, C., CORMACK GATES, C., GROSS, J. E., GOGAN, P., GRASSEL, S., HILTY, J. A., JENSEN, M., KUNKEL, K., LAMMERS, D., LIST, R., MINKOWSKI, K., OLSON, T., PAGUE, C., ROBERTSON, P. B., & STEPHENSON, B.
Affiliations
  • Wildlife Conservation Society (US)
  • Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks (US)
  • Texas A&M University (US)
  • Council of Athabascan Tribal Governments (US)
  • World Wildlife Fund (US)
  • University of Alaska Fairbanks (US)
  • National Park Service (US)
  • United States Geological Survey (US)
  • Institut de Recherche Montesquieu (FR)
  • Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
  • The Nature Conservancy (US)
  • Alaska Department of Fish and Game (US)
Corresponding author
SANDERSON, ERIC W.
Venue
Conservation Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-04
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
252-266
ISSN
  • 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-1739
OpenAlex
W2030987819
Cited by
193
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 8
FWCI
8.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Conservation Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of State
  • World Wildlife Fund
  • Association of Zoos and Aquariums
  • Wildlife Conservation Society
  • Nature Conservancy
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
Keywords
American bison, bison, species restoration, expert opinion, stakeholder consultation, ecosystem recovery
MeSH terms
Animals, Conservation of Natural Resources, Demography, North America, Population Dynamics, Bison, Ecosystem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review