Cited by 200Morphological variations and asymmetryCraniofacial Disorders and TreatmentsAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Epigenetic interactions and the structure of phenotypic variation in the cranium

Open access
Hallgrímsson, B., Lieberman, D.E., Liu, W., Ford‐Hutchinson, A.F., Jirik, F.R.·2007·Evolution & Development

Abstract

Understanding the developmental and genetic basis for evolutionarily significant morphological variation in complex phenotypes such as the mammalian skull is a challenge because of the sheer complexity of the factors involved. We hypothesize that even in this complex system, the expression of phenotypic variation is structured by the interaction of a few key developmental processes. To test this hypothesis, we created a highly variable sample of crania using four mouse mutants and their wild-type controls from similar genetic backgrounds with developmental perturbations to particular cranial regions. Using geometric morphometric methods we compared patterns of size, shape, and integration in the sample within and between the basicranium, neurocranium, and face. The results highlight regular and predictable patterns of covariation among regions of the skull that presumably reflect the epigenetic influences of the genetic perturbations in the sample. Covariation between relative widths of adjoining regions is the most dominant factor, but there are other significant axes of covariation such as the relationship between neurocranial size and basicranial flexion. Although there are other sources of variation related to developmental perturbations not analyzed in this study, the patterns of covariation created by the epigenetic interactions evident in this sample may underlie larger scale evolutionary patterns in mammalian craniofacial form.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1525-142x.2006.00139.x

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patterns of covariation and correlation between different parts of the cranium are partially independent, suggesting they behave as partially independent units.

    “In fact, different studies have shown that the patterns of covariation and correlation between different parts of the cranium are partially independent, thus suggesting that they behave as partially independent units [15,39–42].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hallgrímsson, B., Lieberman, D. E., Liu, W., Ford‐Hutchinson, A. F., & Jirik, F. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Hallgrímsson, B.
Venue
Evolution & Development
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-01
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
76-91
ISSN
  • 1520-541X (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-142X
OpenAlex
W2111806313
Cited by
200
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 10
FWCI
20.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Evolution & Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
skull morphology, phenotypic covariation, epigenetic interactions, mouse mutants, skull development, basicranium, neurocranium, facial morphology, craniofacial evolution, morphological integration
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Sequence, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Mutant Strains, Phenotype, Skull, DNA Primers, Epigenesis, Genetic, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review