Cited by 18Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Early subjective response and acquired tolerance as predictors of alcohol use and related problems in a clinical sample

Open access
Corbin, William R., Scott, Caitlin, Leeman, Robert F., Fucito, Lisa M., Toll, Benjamin A., O'Malley, Stephanie S.·2013·Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated that a low subjective response (SR) to alcohol is a risk factor for alcohol use disorders (AUDs), and a recent study suggests that acquired tolerance can be differentiated from initial SR and is also significantly associated with drinking problems. Because the prior study of SR and tolerance focused on a sample of moderate drinkers, the goal of the current study was to examine relations between early SR, acquired tolerance, alcohol use, and alcohol-related problems in a sample of young adults with clinically significant alcohol problems. METHODS: The current study examined associations between early SR and acquired tolerance and both drinking behavior and alcohol-related problems within a sample of 113 heavy drinking young adults (66.1% male) volunteering for a clinical trial of naltrexone in combination with brief motivational counseling. RESULTS: Consistent with the 1 prior study examining simultaneous effects of early SR and tolerance, both early SR and acquired tolerance were positively associated with typical drinking behavior, although tolerance was a much stronger predictor within this clinical sample. In contrast to the prior study, early SR was inversely associated with risk for alcohol-related problems, and tolerance was not a significant predictor of problems. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggested that, controlling for weekly drinking, a low early SR protected against acute negative consequences within a sample of heavy drinkers who had acquired significant tolerance to alcohol effects. It is possible that this protective effect may eventually shift to a risk factor by allowing individuals with a low SR to persist in a pattern of hazardous drinking.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2012.01956.x

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Human studies in this area have been limited to retrospective patient reports, post mortem brain tissue methods, or cross-sectional laboratory paradigms, none of which directly measure alcohol responses in the same individuals over time.

    “Human studies in this area have been limited to retrospective patient reports(23), post mortem brain tissue methods(24), or cross-sectional laboratory paradigms(2, 3, 25–29), none of which directly measure alcohol responses in the same individuals over time.”
  • Tolerance theory implies that attenuation of subjective alcohol responses over time plays a key role in the development of addiction.

    “Tolerance, a diagnostic criteria for AUD from DSM-III (1980) to DSM-5 (2013)(8), implies that attenuation of subjective alcohol responses over time plays a key role in the development of addiction.”
  • Previous studies relying on proxy measures of brain-behavior relationships to alcohol response have not been able to address within-person changes or stabilization in alcohol response over time.

    “Previous studies relying on proxy measures of brain-behavior relationships to alcohol response(2, 3, 23–29) have not been able to address within-person changes or stabilization in alcohol response over time.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Corbin, W. R., Scott, C., Leeman, R. F., Fucito, L. M., Toll, B. A., & O'Malley, S. S.
Affiliations
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • Yale Cancer Center (US)
  • Department of Psychiatry Yale University School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut
Corresponding author
Corbin, William R.
Venue
Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-01-24
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
490-497
ISSN
  • 0145-6008 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-0277
OpenAlex
W2089151021
Cited by
18
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (K01AA019694, K05AA014715, KO5-AA01471, K23AA020000, AA016621, R01AA016621)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
subjective response to alcohol, alcoholism, alcohol-related problems, heavy drinking, young adults, naltrexone, alcoholism treatment, drinking behavior
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Alcohol Drinking, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Alcohol-Related Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review