Cited by 256Older Adults Driving StudiesTraffic and Road SafetyCognitive Functions and Memory

Cognitive Training Decreases Motor Vehicle Collision Involvement of Older Drivers

Open access
Ball, Karlene, Edwards, Jerri D., Ross, Lesley A., McGwin, Jr., Gerald·2010·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To test the effects of cognitive training on subsequent motor vehicle collision (MVC) involvement of older drivers. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled, multisite, single‐blind clinical trial. SETTING: Community‐dwelling seniors at four U.S. sites: Birmingham, Alabama; Baltimore, Maryland; Indianapolis, Indiana; and State College, Pennsylvania. PARTICIPANTS: Nine hundred eight older drivers (mean age 73.1; 18.6% African American) who were randomized to one of three cognitive interventions or a control condition. INTERVENTIONS: Up to 10 sessions of cognitive training for memory, reasoning, or speed of processing. MEASUREMENTS: State‐recorded MVC involvement up to 6 years after study enrollment. RESULTS: Speed‐of‐processing and reasoning training resulted in lower rates of at‐fault collision involvement over the subsequent approximately 6‐year period than controls. After adjusting for age, sex, race, education, mental status, health, vision, depressive symptoms, and testing site, participants randomized to the speed‐of‐processing and reasoning interventions had an approximately 50% lower rate (per person‐mile) of at‐fault MVCs than the control group (rate ratio (RR)=0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.34–0.96 for speed of processing), and (RR=0.50, 95% CI=0.27–0.92 for reasoning). There was no significant difference observed for the memory group. CONCLUSION: Cognitive speed‐of‐processing and reasoning training resulted in a lower at‐fault MVC rate in older drivers than in controls. Considering the importance of driving mobility, the costs of crashes, and the benefits of cognitive training, these interventions have great potential to sustain independence and quality of life of older adults. More research is needed to understand the effects of different types and quantities of training.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03138.x

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [35]Ackerman ML Edwards JD Ball KK Ross LA Lunsman M Cognitive and everyday performance as indicators of risk for driving cessation across three-years among older adults from the ACTIVE study The Gerontologist 2008 48 802 810 19139253 PMC5035548
  2. [40]Edwards JD Myers C Ross LA The longitudinal impact of speed of processing training upon subsequent mobility of older drivers The Gerontologist 2009 49 485 494 19491362 PMC2709540

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ball, K., Edwards, J. D., Ross, L. A., & McGwin, Jr.
Affiliations
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • University of South Florida (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-11
Volume
58
Issue
11
Pages
2107-2113
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W2109077430
Cited by
256
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 14
FWCI
35.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (R03AG023078, U01 AG14282, U01AG014260, U01 AG 14263, U01AG14260, U01-AG14289, U01AG014289, U01AG014263, U01AG014276, U01AG014282, U01 AG14276)
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (U01NR004507, U01NR04507, U01NR004508, U01 NR04508)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Older Adults Driving Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
cognitive training, older drivers, traffic accidents, processing speed, reasoning training, memory training, at-fault crashes, driving safety, cognitive aging, older adults
MeSH terms
Accidents, Traffic, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Single-Blind Method

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review