CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 590Innovation and Knowledge ManagementEntrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesOrganizational Learning and Leadership

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 109 of the 111 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The role of organizational learning in the opportunity-recognition process

Lumpkin, G.T., Lichtenstein, Benyamin Bergmann·2005·Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice
DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00093.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Firms engage in entrepreneurship to increase performance through both strategic renewal and the creation of new venture opportunities. Organizational learning (OL) has become an effective avenue for strategic renewal. But what of creating venture opportunities—can OL enhance the process of recognizing and pursuing new ventures? This article argues that OL can strengthen a firm's ability to recognize opportunities and help equip them to effectively pursue new ventures. First, we identify three approaches to OL—behavioral, cognitive, and action. Then, we introduce a creativity–based model of opportunity recognition (OpR) that includes two phases—discovery and formation. Next, we show how each of the three types of learning is linked to the two phases of OpR. We suggest propositions that support our claim that OL enhances OpR and offer examples of firms that have used these organizational–learning approaches to more effectively recognize and pursue venture opportunities. These insights have important implications for entrepreneurial firms seeking to advance the venture–creation process.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00093.x

Cites

109 of 109 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 111 references

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Argyris C., 1990, Overcoming Organizational Defenses
  2. Argyris C., 1985, Action science
  3. Bateson G., 1972, Steps to an ecology of mind
  4. Christensen P.S., 1989, Opportunity identification: The contribution of entrepreneurship to strategic management
  5. Csikszentmihalyi M., 1996, Creativity
  6. 10.2307/258441 · DOI
  7. 10.1177/104225870102500406 · DOI
  8. De KoningA. (1999). Opportunity formation from a socio–cognitive perspective. Paper presented at the UIC/AMA Research Symposium on the Interface of Marketing and Entrepreneurship, Nice, France.
  9. Dragoon A., 2003, CIO, 16, 91
  10. Fryer B., 1999, Inc. Magazine, 3, 61
  11. Gaglio C.M., 1992, In Frontiers of entrepreneurship research, 136
  12. Garvin D., 1993, Harvard Business Review, 78
  13. Herriott S., 1985, American Economic Review, 75, 298
  14. IBM Group on Knowledge Management, 1999, Knowledge Management, 86
  15. Kao J., 1989, Entrepreneurship, creativity, and organization
  16. Kim D., 1993, Sloan Management Review, 37
  17. Kirzner I., 1979, Perception, opportunity, and entrepreneurship
  18. Koehn N., 2001, Howard Schultz and Starbucks coffee company
  19. KPMG Management Consulting, 1998, Knowledge management research report
  20. Long W., 1984, In Frontiers of entrepreneurship research, 567
  21. 10.2307/258632 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.2307/259057 · DOI
  23. Nelson R., 1982, An evolutionary theory of economic theory and capabilities
  24. Rosenwein R., 2001, Inc. Magazine, 23, 54
  25. Shrivastava P., 1983, Advances in strategic management, 2, 177
  26. 10.2307/258961 · DOI
  27. Singh R., 1999, In Frontiers of entrepreneurship research, 228
  28. Stevenson H., 1985, Harvard Business Review, 85
  29. Stevenson H.H., 1990, Strategic Management Journal, 11
  30. Timmons J., 1994, New venture creation
  31. Torbert W., 1991, The power of balance
  32. Van de Ven A., 1991, Organization Science, 3, 91

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 590

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Lumpkin, G. T., & Lichtenstein, B. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Boston (US)
Corresponding author
  • Lumpkin, G.T.
  • Lichtenstein, Benyamin Bergmann
ORCID
Venue
Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2005-07
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
451-472
ISSN
  • 1042-2587 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-6520
DOI
10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00093.x
OpenAlex
W1993301352
Cited by
590
References
111
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 31
FWCI
49.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Learning and Leadership
Keywords
organizational learning, opportunity recognition, startups, behavioral learning, cognitive learning, action learning, creativity, strategic renewal, entrepreneurial firms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review