The DOI matches its Crossref record; 109 of the 111 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The role of organizational learning in the opportunity-recognition process
Abstract
Firms engage in entrepreneurship to increase performance through both strategic renewal and the creation of new venture opportunities. Organizational learning (OL) has become an effective avenue for strategic renewal. But what of creating venture opportunities—can OL enhance the process of recognizing and pursuing new ventures? This article argues that OL can strengthen a firm's ability to recognize opportunities and help equip them to effectively pursue new ventures. First, we identify three approaches to OL—behavioral, cognitive, and action. Then, we introduce a creativity–based model of opportunity recognition (OpR) that includes two phases—discovery and formation. Next, we show how each of the three types of learning is linked to the two phases of OpR. We suggest propositions that support our claim that OL enhances OpR and offer examples of firms that have used these organizational–learning approaches to more effectively recognize and pursue venture opportunities. These insights have important implications for entrepreneurial firms seeking to advance the venture–creation process.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Thus, learning can put entrepreneurs in an advantageous position to recognize opportunities (Lumpkin and Lichtenstein, 2005).”
From Work hard or play hard: the effect of leisure crafting on opportunity recognition and venture performance (2023) · cites this paper as Lumpkin and Lichtenstein, 2005
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
(1994) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/0002-8223(94)92216-0 · Cited by 46,726
Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage
Barney, J. B. (2004) · Advances in strategic management · doi:10.1016/s0742-3322(00)17018-4 · Cited by 38,216
Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393553 · Cited by 35,728
The Theory of Economic Development
Schumpeter, J. A., & Backhaus, U. (2003) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.1007/0-306-48082-4_3 · Cited by 22,757
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942
The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195092691.001.0001 · Cited by 18,010
A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation
Nonaka, I. (1994) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.5.1.14 · Cited by 17,809
The Knowledge-Creating Company
Nonaka, I. (1998) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-7506-7009-8.50016-1 · Cited by 14,668
The Promise of Enterpreneurship as a Field of Research
Shane, S. A., & Venkataraman, S. (2000) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2000.2791611 · Cited by 13,596
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- Argyris C., 1990, Overcoming Organizational Defenses
- Argyris C., 1985, Action science
- Bateson G., 1972, Steps to an ecology of mind
- Christensen P.S., 1989, Opportunity identification: The contribution of entrepreneurship to strategic management
- Csikszentmihalyi M., 1996, Creativity
- 10.2307/258441 · DOI
- 10.1177/104225870102500406 · DOI
- De KoningA. (1999). Opportunity formation from a socio–cognitive perspective. Paper presented at the UIC/AMA Research Symposium on the Interface of Marketing and Entrepreneurship, Nice, France.
- Dragoon A., 2003, CIO, 16, 91
- Fryer B., 1999, Inc. Magazine, 3, 61
- Gaglio C.M., 1992, In Frontiers of entrepreneurship research, 136
- Garvin D., 1993, Harvard Business Review, 78
- Herriott S., 1985, American Economic Review, 75, 298
- IBM Group on Knowledge Management, 1999, Knowledge Management, 86
- Kao J., 1989, Entrepreneurship, creativity, and organization
- Kim D., 1993, Sloan Management Review, 37
- Kirzner I., 1979, Perception, opportunity, and entrepreneurship
- Koehn N., 2001, Howard Schultz and Starbucks coffee company
- KPMG Management Consulting, 1998, Knowledge management research report
- Long W., 1984, In Frontiers of entrepreneurship research, 567
- 10.2307/258632 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/259057 · DOI
- Nelson R., 1982, An evolutionary theory of economic theory and capabilities
- Rosenwein R., 2001, Inc. Magazine, 23, 54
- Shrivastava P., 1983, Advances in strategic management, 2, 177
- 10.2307/258961 · DOI
- Singh R., 1999, In Frontiers of entrepreneurship research, 228
- Stevenson H., 1985, Harvard Business Review, 85
- Stevenson H.H., 1990, Strategic Management Journal, 11
- Timmons J., 1994, New venture creation
- Torbert W., 1991, The power of balance
- Van de Ven A., 1991, Organization Science, 3, 91
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Press, P. M. (2015) · ADVANCED SCIENCES INDEX · Cited by 1,164
Entrepreneurial opportunities and the entrepreneurship nexus: A re-conceptualization
Davidsson, P. (2015) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2015.01.002 · Cited by 1,042
Entrepreneurial alertness in the pursuit of new opportunities
Tang, J., Kacmar, K. M. (., & Busenitz, L. (2012) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.07.001 · Cited by 1,013
Conceptualizing Corporate Entrepreneurship Strategy
Ireland, R. D., Covin, J. G., & Kuratko, D. F. (2009) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00279.x · Cited by 917
Short, J. C., Ketchen, D. J., Shook, C. L., & Ireland, R. D. (2009) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206309342746 · Cited by 818
Metadata
- Authors
- Lumpkin, G. T., & Lichtenstein, B. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- University of Massachusetts Boston (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lumpkin, G.T.
- Lichtenstein, Benyamin Bergmann
- Venue
- Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 451-472
- ISSN
- 1042-2587 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-6520
- OpenAlex
- W1993301352
- Cited by
- 590
- References
- 111
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 31
- FWCI
- 49.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Learning and Leadership
- Keywords
- organizational learning, opportunity recognition, startups, behavioral learning, cognitive learning, action learning, creativity, strategic renewal, entrepreneurial firms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review