Cited by 239Sleep and related disordersMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumPregnancy-related medical research

Sleep disturbances during pregnancy

Mindell, Jodi A., Jacobson, Barry J.·2000·Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing

Abstract

Objective To assess sleep patterns and prevalence of sleep disturbances during pregnancy.Design Cross-sectional design; prospective questionnaire.Setting Outpatient, private obstetric clinic.Participants 127 consecutive patients, with women evaluated at one of four points in pregnancy, 8-12 weeks (n = 37), 18-22 weeks (n = 28), 25-28 weeks (n = 24), and 35-38 weeks (n = 38).Main outcome measure Questionnaire of sleep habits and sleep disturbances.Results A large percentage of the women experienced sleep disturbances during pregnancy, These problems included frequent night wakings, difficulty falling asleep, and symptoms of sleep apnea. Few differences in sleep patterns were found across pregnancy, although women were found to sleep more and nap more by the end of pregnancy.Conclusion Sleep disturbances are common during pregnancy, especially late in pregnancy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2000.tb02072.x

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The prevalence of a probable diagnosis of perinatal insomnia ranges from 41 to 58% of perinatal women.

    “The prevalence of a probable diagnosis of perinatal insomnia range from 41 to 58 % of perinatal women [54,71,72].”

    From Non-Pharmacological Treatment of Insomnia (2012) · cites this paper as [54]

  • In the study population, 36.5% of participants reported either short or long sleep duration and over 70% reported vital exhaustion.

    “In our study population, 36.5% of participants reported either short or long sleep duration and over 70% of participants reported vital exhaustion, supporting the evidence that sleep deprivation and sleep disturbance during pregnancy is highly prevalent [7–10].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mindell, J. A., & Jacobson, B. J.
Affiliations
  • Saint Joseph's University (US)
  • Delaware County Memorial Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Mindell, Jodi A.
Venue
Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-11
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
590-597
ISSN
  • 0090-0311 (ISSN-L)
  • 0884-2175
OpenAlex
W2021951890
Cited by
239
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 13
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy-related medical research
Keywords
sleep disorders, pregnancy, sleep patterns, nocturnal awakenings, sleep onset difficulty, sleep apnea, napping, sleep habits, prevalence
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Patient Education as Topic, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Sleep Wake Disorders, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review