The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
EVIDENCE FOR COEVOLUTION OF SOCIALITY AND RELATIVE BRAIN SIZE IN THREE ORDERS OF MAMMALS
Abstract
As the brain is responsible for managing an individual's behavioral response to its environment, we should expect that large relative brain size is an evolutionary response to cognitively challenging behaviors. The "social brain hypothesis" argues that maintaining group cohesion is cognitively demanding as individuals living in groups need to be able to resolve conflicts that impact on their ability to meet resource requirements. If sociality does impose cognitive demands, we expect changes in relative brain size and sociality to be coupled over evolutionary time. In this study, we analyze data on sociality and relative brain size for 206 species of ungulates, carnivores, and primates and provide, for the first time, evidence that changes in sociality and relative brain size are closely correlated over evolutionary time for all three mammalian orders. This suggests a process of coevolution and provides support for the social brain theory. However, differences between taxonomic orders in the stability of the transition between small-brained/nonsocial and large-brained/social imply that, although sociality is cognitively demanding, sociality and relative brain size can become decoupled in some cases. Carnivores seem to have been especially prone to this.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“the high degree of encephalization reached by the neocortex of social mammals, especially by Homo sapiens, may be a direct consequence of the cognitive demands required for the stable management of complex relationships that occur within social groups”
From Internet use and access, behavior, cyberbullying, and grooming: Results of an investigative whole city survey of adolescents (2017) · cites this paper as [40]
In the citing paper
“Dunbar has come to identify an approximate number of 150 friends or social relationships that the individual human subject is actually able to maintain”
From Internet use and access, behavior, cyberbullying, and grooming: Results of an investigative whole city survey of adolescents (2017) · cites this paper as [40]
Citations
Cites
Gentleman R: R: A language for data analysis and graphics
Ihaka, R., & Gentleman, R. (1996) · Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10618600.1996.10474713 · Cited by 11,747
APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language
Paradis, E., Claude, J., & Strimmer, K. (2004) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg412 · Cited by 11,335
Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution
Pagel, M. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/44766 · Cited by 5,200
R: A Language for Data Analysis and Graphics
Ihaka, R., & Gentleman, R. C. (1996) · Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics · doi:10.2307/1390807 · Cited by 4,245
Nowak, R. (1999) · doi:10.56021/9780801857898 · Cited by 4,102
The Evolution of Parental Care
Clutton‐Brock, T. H. (2019) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctvs32ssj · Cited by 3,143
Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach
Ormond, R., Krebs, J. R., & Davies, N. (1983) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/4581 · Cited by 2,907
The Evolution of Parental Care
Clutton‐Brock, T. H. (1991) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691206981 · Cited by 2,785
Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1992) · Journal of Human Evolution · doi:10.1016/0047-2484(92)90081-j · Cited by 2,542
Self-citationProcedures for the Analysis of Comparative Data Using Phylogenetically Independent Contrasts
Garland, T., Harvey, P. H., & Ives, A. R. (1992) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/41.1.18 · Cited by 2,151
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1999.tb00184.x · DOI
- Bleich V. C., 1997, Wildl. Monogr., 134, 1
- Haarmann K., 1975, J. fur Hirnforschung, 16, 91
- Oboussier H., 1966, Zeitscrift fur Saugertierk, 31, 464
- Perez-Barberia F. J., 2001, Evol. Ecol. Res., 3, 221
- Smuts B. B., 1987, Primate societies
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The evolution of self-control.
MacLean, E. L., Hare, B., Nunn, C. L., Addessi, E., Amici, F., Anderson, R. C., Aureli, F., Baker, J. M., Bania, A. E., Barnard, A. M., et al. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1323533111 · Cited by 819
The social brain hypothesis and its implications for social evolution
Dunbar, R. I. M. (2009) · Annals of Human Biology · doi:10.1080/03014460902960289 · Cited by 795
Self-citationPrimate brain size is predicted by diet but not sociality
DeCasien, A. R., Williams, S. A., & Higham, J. P. (2017) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0112 · Cited by 479
Understanding primate brain evolution
Dunbar, R. I. M., & Shultz, S. (2007) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2006.2001 · Cited by 392
Self-citationVentromedial prefrontal volume predicts understanding of others and social network size
Lewis, P. A., Rezaie, R., Brown, R., Roberts, N., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.030 · Cited by 321
“…between social group size and neocortex volume in primates, otherwise known as the social brain hypothesis (Dunbar, 1998; Dunbar and Shultz, 2007; Pérez-Barbería et al., 2007; Shultz and Dunbar, 2007, 2010), implies that the social cognitive skills underpinning this relationship must have some…”
BackgroundSelf-citationTechnical innovations drive the relationship between innovativeness and residual brain size in birds
Overington, S. E., Morand‐Ferron, J., Boogert, N. J., & Lefebvre, L. (2009) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.06.033 · Cited by 271
“…and broad areas controlling multiple processes (e.g. mammalian cortex, avian pallium and insect mushroom bodies: Timmermans et al. 2000;Reader & Laland 2002; Farris & Roberts 2005; Perez-Barberia et al. 2007; telencephalon: DeVoogd 2004; whole brain: Sol et al. 2005, 2007; Ratcliffe et al. 2006).”
Why are there so many explanations for primate brain evolution?
Dunbar, R., & Shultz, S. (2017) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0244 · Cited by 272
“In primates, social group size correlates with a wide range of brain indices, including absolute and relative cranial volume [105], brain volume [7,106], neocortex volume [5,10,42,107], non-striate neocortex volume [108] and frontal lobe volume [109] (with and without phylogenetic correction in all these cases and wit…”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationParasites, democratization, and the liberalization of values across contemporary countries
Thornhill, R., Fincher, C. L., & Aran, D. (2009) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2008.00062.x · Cited by 260
The establishment and maintenance of dominance hierarchies
Tibbetts, E., Pardo-Sanchez, J., & Weise, C. (2022) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2020.0450 · Cited by 216
Bailey, I., Myatt, J. P., & Wilson, A. M. (2012) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-012-1423-3 · Cited by 233
Pearce, E., Stringer, C. B., & Dunbar, R. (2013) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.0168 · Cited by 224
“For instance, there is a wellestablished relationship between brain and bonded group size across anthropoid primates [48–57], as well as between specific areas of the frontal lobe and active social network (total number of personal contacts) size at the within-species individual level in both macaques [58] and, more i…”
BackgroundSelf-citationBrain-size evolution and sociality in Carnivora
Finarelli, J. A., & Flynn, J. J. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0901780106 · Cited by 217
“This presents a potential explanatory mechanism for the patterns observed in this study; for example, living canids are characterized by relatively large brains and highly social behaviors (7, 31), therefore the observed encephalization increase between stem and crown taxa in the Canidae might signal the origin of com…”
BackgroundBrains, Lifestyles and Cognition: Are There General Trends?
Lefebvre, L., & Sol, D. (2008) · Brain Behavior and Evolution · doi:10.1159/000151473 · Cited by 184
“Continuous variables were then added, most notably size of the social unit [Sawaguchi and Kudo, 1990; Perez-Barberia et al., 2007].”
Farris, S. M., & Schulmeister, S. (2010) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.2161 · Cited by 181
Re-evaluating the link between brain size and behavioural ecology in primates
Powell, L. E., Isler, K., & Barton, R. A. (2017) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2017.1765 · Cited by 180
Mind the fish: zebrafish as a model in cognitive social neuroscience
Oliveira, R. F. (2013) · Frontiers in Neural Circuits · doi:10.3389/fncir.2013.00131 · Cited by 176
“…in primates (Dunbar, 1992; Barton, 1996), the social brain hypothesis has been extended to other taxa, including non-primate mammals (e.g., Perez-Barberia et al., 2007), birds (e.g., Burish et al., 2004; Emery et al., 2007), fish (e.g., Pollen et al., 2007; Gonzalez-Voyer et al., 2009)…”
BackgroundThe Cultural Brain Hypothesis: How culture drives brain expansion, sociality, and life history
Muthukrishna, M., Doebeli, M., Chudek, M., & Henrich, J. (2018) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006504 · Cited by 166
Social cognition on the Internet: testing constraints on social network size
Dunbar, R. I. M. (2012) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0121 · Cited by 148
Self-citationEvolutionary ecology of intraspecific brain size variation: a review
Gonda, A., Herczeg, G., & Merilä, J. (2013) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.627 · Cited by 141
“Social complexity, requiring life in large and complex groups or in pair bonds is accepted as the main driver of primate, especially human, brain size evolution (also known as “social brain hypothesis”, e.g., Dunbar 1998; Dunbar and Shultz 2007a,b; Perez-Barberia et al. 2007).”
BackgroundLinking brains and brawn: exercise and the evolution of human neurobiology
Raichlen, D. A., & Polk, J. D. (2012) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.2250 · Cited by 138
“As with other studies of brain size [80], humans, and primates more generally, must be examined in their appropriate phylogenetic context, and not in comparisons with a wide array of non-primate mammals [6].”
BackgroundThe social and cultural roots of whale and dolphin brains
Fox, K. C. R., Muthukrishna, M., & Shultz, S. (2017) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0336-y · Cited by 136
“Although previous studies have identified links between brain size and sociality 37,38 or social group size 39,40 , few studies have evaluated the behaviours and cognition underpinning social living.”
Self-citationAntiquity and Social Functions of Multilevel Social Organization Among Human Hunter-Gatherers
Layton, R., O'Hara, S., & Bilsborough, A. (2012) · International journal of primatology · doi:10.1007/s10764-012-9634-z · Cited by 116
“The analysis of Pérez-Barbería et al. (2007) demonstrated a tight coupling of sociality (in the form of intense and rich social relationships, i.e., social complexity) and brain size (in the form of neocortex enlargement), strongly suggesting their coevolution.”
Behavioural ecology at the spatial–social interface
Webber, Q. M. R., Albery, G. F., Farine, D. R., Pinter‐Wollman, N., Sharma, N., Spiegel, O., Wal, E. V., & Manlove, K. R. (2023) · Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · doi:10.1111/brv.12934 · Cited by 149
Gonda, A., Herczeg, G., & Merilä, J. (2009) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.0026 · Cited by 122
An exploration of the social brain hypothesis in insects.
Lihoreau, M., Latty, T., & Chittka, L. (2012) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2012.00442 · Cited by 118
“This “social brain” hypothesis has received some support from correlations between measures of brain size and proxies for social complexity in various mammals (Dunbar and Shultz, 2007; Pérez-Barberia et al., 2007).”
BackgroundBergman, T. J. (2010) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.0580 · Cited by 104
“First, across many taxa, increased sociality is associated with increased brain size, suggesting coevolution between these two traits (e.g. Barton 1996; Perez-Barberia et al. 2007).”
BackgroundMontgomery, S. H., Capellini, I., Barton, R. A., & Mundy, N. I. (2010) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/1741-7007-8-9 · Cited by 98
“A trend towards brain expansion is assumed to have occurred throughout primate evolution [6] and this has been interpreted as an indication of directional selection on cognitive abilities, due, for example, to arms races in social cognition [7,8].”
BackgroundO’Donnell, S., Bulova, S. J., DeLeon, S., Khodak, P., Miller, S., & Sulger, E. (2015) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2015.0791 · Cited by 102
Social bonds and rank acquisition in raven nonbreeder aggregations
Braun, A., & Bugnyar, T. (2012) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.09.024 · Cited by 102
Evolutionary Divergence in Brain Size between Migratory and Resident Birds
Sol, D., Garcia, N., Iwaniuk, A. N., Davis, K. E., Meade, A., Boyle, W. A., & Székely, T. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009617 · Cited by 97
Collective minds: social network topology shapes collective cognition
Momennejad, I. (2021) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2020.0315 · Cited by 105
“B 377 : 2020031 5 correspond to the size of the brain in primates [55] and other mammals [58].”
BackgroundBugnyar, T. (2013) · Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews · doi:10.3819/ccbr.2013.80001 · Cited by 92
Evolution of the brain and intelligence in primates
Roth, G., & Dicke, U. (2012) · Progress in brain research · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-53860-4.00020-9 · Cited by 91
Sociality, ecology, and relative brain size in lemurs
MacLean, E. L., Barrickman, N. L., Johnson, E. M., & Wall, C. E. (2009) · Journal of Human Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.12.005 · Cited by 89
“Further, Pérez-Barberı́a et al. (2007) showed that changes in relative brain size and sociality are tightly coupled within primates, suggesting a coevolutionary relationship in which changes in one of these variables seldom occurs without corresponding changes in the other.”
Monogamy: Cause, Consequence, or Corollary of Success in Wild Canids?
Macdonald, D. W., Campbell, L., Kamler, J. F., Mariño, J., Werhahn, G., & Sillero‐Zubiri, C. (2019) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2019.00341 · Cited by 86
Goats excel at learning and remembering a highly novel cognitive task
Briefer, E. F., Haque, S., Baciadonna, L., & McElligott, A. G. (2014) · Frontiers in Zoology · doi:10.1186/1742-9994-11-20 · Cited by 83
Social complexity and the fractal structure of group size in primate social evolution
Dunbar, R., & Shultz, S. (2021) · Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · doi:10.1111/brv.12730 · Cited by 82
“In primates [but not in other mammals or birds (Shultz & Dunbar, 2007, 2010a; Pérez-Barbería et al., 2007b)], brain size – and, specifically, neocortex volume – is a robust predictor of both social group size and many other aspects of social behaviour (including grooming clique size, coalitionary…”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationSmith, A. R., Seid, M. A., Jimenez, L., & Wcislo, W. T. (2010) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.0269 · Cited by 82
Developmental constraints on behavioural flexibility
Holekamp, K. E., Swanson, E. M., & Meter, P. E. V. (2013) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0350 · Cited by 77
“Despite these similarities, the average behavioural repertoire size (number of behaviours in the ethogram for a species) is much larger in primates than carnivores (mean for carnivores is 71 versus 107 for primates [41]), there is a striking grade shift between them in brain size and size of specific brain regions [42…”
BackgroundSocial Information Transmission in Animals: Lessons from Studies of Diffusion
Duboscq, J., Romano, V., MacIntosh, A. J. J., & Sueur, C. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01147 · Cited by 72
Scheiber, I. B. R., Weiß, B., Kingma, S. A., & Komdeur, J. (2017) · Frontiers in Zoology · doi:10.1186/s12983-016-0185-6 · Cited by 68
Multiple Determinants of Whole and Regional Brain Volume among Terrestrial Carnivorans
Swanson, E. M., Holekamp, K. E., Lundrigan, B. L., Arsznov, B. M., & Sakai, S. T. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038447 · Cited by 68
“[17,18,53]).”
Brain Size and Social Complexity: A Computed Tomography Study in Hyaenidae
Sakai, S. T., Arsznov, B. M., Lundrigan, B. L., & Holekamp, K. E. (2011) · Brain Behavior and Evolution · doi:10.1159/000323849 · Cited by 66
“Researchers have reported a relationship between total brain volume and social complexity in carnivores and insectivores [Dunbar and Bever, 1998; Pérez-Barberia et al., 2007], ungulates [Shultz and Dunbar, 2006; Pérez-Barberia et al., 2007], odontocete cetaceans [Marino, 1996], and primates…”
BackgroundHabits of the heart: Life history and the developmental neuroendocrinology of emotion
Worthman, C. M. (2009) · American Journal of Human Biology · doi:10.1002/ajhb.20966 · Cited by 66
“Indeed, these pressures alone have been proposed as prime movers for evolution of expanded cranial capacity (Perez-Barberia et al. 2007), and as determinants of social network configurations and sustainable group sizes in humans (Dunbar 2008).”
BackgroundThe comparative approach and brain–behaviour relationships: A tool for understanding tool use.
Iwaniuk, A. N., Lefebvre, L., & WYLIE, D. R. W. (2009) · Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale · doi:10.1037/a0015678 · Cited by 64
Comparative studies of brain evolution: a critical insight from the Chiroptera
Dechmann, D. K. N., & Safi, K. (2009) · Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2008.00067.x · Cited by 63
Whiten, A. (2018) · Journal of comparative psychology · doi:10.1037/com0000135 · Cited by 64
Integrating brain, behavior, and phylogeny to understand the evolution of sensory systems in birds
WYLIE, D. R. W., Gutiérrez‐Ibáñez, C., & Iwaniuk, A. N. (2015) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2015.00281 · Cited by 63
Social carnivores outperform asocial carnivores on an innovative problem
Borrego, N., & Gaines, M. S. (2016) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.01.013 · Cited by 60
Brain size as a driver of avian escape strategy
Samia, D. S. M., Møller, A. P., & Blumstein, D. T. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep11913 · Cited by 59
Lombard, M., & Högberg, A. (2021) · Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory · doi:10.1007/s10816-020-09502-6 · Cited by 60
“Whereas an increase in brain size probably played a role in early hominin evolution in terms of the social brain hypothesis (e.g. Dunbar 1998; Pérez-Barbería et al. 2007), amongst other things, it is clear from the data presented in the Galway-Witham et al. (2019) graph that by the MSA/MP, this…”
BackgroundFluctuations in Evolutionary Integration Allow for Big Brains and Disparate Faces
Evans, K. M., Waltz, B. T., Tagliacollo., V. A., Sidlauskas, B. L., & Albert, J. S. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep40431 · Cited by 58
Embracing covariation in brain evolution
Charvet, C. J., & Finlay, B. L. (2012) · Progress in brain research · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-53860-4.00004-0 · Cited by 56
“In a series of studies beginning in the early 1990s, Dunbar and his colleagues showed that the relative size of the isocortex or brain size and residuals derived from a linear regression of brain and body size positively correlate with group size or related measures of group size in primates (Dunbar, 1992, 2009; Dunba…”
InfluentialSociality does not drive the evolution of large brains in eusocial African mole-rats
Kverková, K., Bělíková, T., Olkowicz, S., Pavelková, Z., O'Riain, M. J., Šumbera, R., Burda, H., Bennett, N. C., & Němec, P. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-26062-8 · Cited by 55
Bite force and encephalization in the C anidae ( M ammalia: C arnivora)
Damasceno, E. M., Hingst‐Zaher, E., & Astúa, D. (2013) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1111/jzo.12030 · Cited by 54
Finlay, B. L., Hinz, F. I., & Darlington, R. B. (2011) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0344 · Cited by 58
Lombard, M. (2021) · Quaternary Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2021.107021 · Cited by 56
Markov, A. V., & Markov, M. A. (2020) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.6350 · Cited by 50
Evolutionary dynamics of recent selection on cognitive abilities
Miller, S., Legan, A. W., Henshaw, M. T., Ostevik, K. L., Samuk, K., Uy, F. M. K., Reeve, H. K., & Sheehan, M. J. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1918592117 · Cited by 51
Reversed brain size sexual dimorphism accompanies loss of parental care in white sticklebacks
Samuk, K., Iritani, D., & Schluter, D. (2014) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.1175 · Cited by 48
Collective personalities: present knowledge and new frontiers
Wright, C. M., Lichtenstein, J. L. L., Doering, G. N., Pretorius, J., Meunier, J., & Pruitt, J. N. (2019) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-019-2639-2 · Cited by 46
Linking ecology and cognition: does ecological specialisation predict cognitive test performance?
der Malsburg, J. H., Kappeler, P. M., & Fichtel, C. (2020) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-020-02923-z · Cited by 56
Both Diet and Sociality Affect Primate Brain-Size Evolution
Grabowski, M. W., Kopperud, B. T., Tsuboi, M., & Hansen, T. F. (2022) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syac075 · Cited by 44
Big Cat Coalitions: A Comparative Analysis of Regional Brain Volumes in Felidae
Sakai, S. T., Arsznov, B. M., Hristova, A. E., Yoon, E. J., & Lundrigan, B. L. (2016) · Frontiers in Neuroanatomy · doi:10.3389/fnana.2016.00099 · Cited by 49
“…for the social brain hypothesis was provided by three subsequent studies which found positive correlations between sociality in carnivores and relative brain size (Perez-Barberia et al., 2007), relative cerebrum volume (Swanson et al., 2012), and relative neocortex size (Dunbar and Bever, 1998).”
BackgroundA framework for conceptualizing dimensions of social organization in mammals
Prox, L., & Farine, D. R. (2019) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.5936 · Cited by 43
The lemur baseline: how lemurs compare to monkeys and apes in the Primate Cognition Test Battery
Fichtel, C., Dinter, K., & Kappeler, P. M. (2020) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.10025 · Cited by 46
Vogt, C. C., Zipple, M. N., Sprockett, D. D., Miller, C. H., Hardy, S. X., Arthur, M. K., Greenstein, A. M., Colvin, M. S., Michel, L. M., Moeller, A. H., et al. (2024) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/s12915-024-01809-0 · Cited by 44
“The organization of mammal societies is influenced by ecological [100–102], demographic [103– 106], and phylogenetic factors [107–109], each of which were controlled for in our trials.”
BackgroundEcological Determinants of Social Systems
Chaverri, G., & Kunz, T. (2010) · Advances in the study of behavior · doi:10.1016/s0065-3454(10)42009-4 · Cited by 41
The Infertility Trap: The Fertility Costs of Group-Living in Mammalian Social Evolution
Dunbar, R., & Shultz, S. (2021) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2021.634664 · Cited by 41
Self-citationReser, J. E. (2011) · Evolutionary Psychology · doi:10.1177/147470491100900209 · Cited by 43
“It is clear that there are costs and benefits to living in groups and that the pressures from the social environment can change abruptly (Perez-Barberia, Shultz, and Dunbar, 2007).”
BackgroundBrain size, ecology and sociality: a reptilian perspective
Meester, G. D., Huyghe, K., & Damme, R. V. (2018) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1093/biolinnean/bly206 · Cited by 39
Levels and mechanisms of behavioural variability
Kappeler, P. M., & Kraus, C. (2010) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02624-9_21 · Cited by 39
The social brain hypothesis – thirty years on
Dunbar, R. (2024) · Annals of Human Biology · doi:10.1080/03014460.2024.2359920 · Cited by 37
“…derivative of selection for specialised cognition required for group-living in primates, ungulates, carnivores, bats, cetaceans, and birds (Pérez-Barbería et al. 2007; Shultz and Dunbar 2007, 2010a, 2010b, 2022; Dunbar and Shultz 2017, 2021; Fox et al. 2017), (2) this relationship…”
Self-citationO’Donnell, S., Clifford, M. R., & Molina, Y. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1017566108 · Cited by 37
Population densities predict forebrain size variation in the cleaner fish Labroides dimidiatus
Triki, Z., Levorato, E., McNeely, W., Marshall, N. J., & Bshary, R. (2019) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2019.2108 · Cited by 35
“Despite its initial success, the SBH is now viewed with more scepticism for two main reasons: on a more technical level, various studies found supporting evidence only if group size and neocortex ratio were replaced with other measures [19,31,63,78,88,89] thus introducing arbitrary factors in the analyses.”
The evolution of capture myopathy in hooved mammals: a model for human stress cardiomyopathy?
Blumstein, D. T., Buckner, J. C., Shah, S., Patel, S., Alfaro, M. E., & Natterson-Horowitz, B. (2015) · Evolution Medicine and Public Health · doi:10.1093/emph/eov015 · Cited by 36
“Indeed, more social species, including ungulates, may have larger brains [51].”
BackgroundAbsolute, not relative brain size correlates with sociality in ground squirrels
Matějů, J., Kratochvíl, L., Pavelková, Z., Řičánková, V. P., Vohralík, V., & Němec, P. (2016) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2015.2725 · Cited by 36
Why direct effects of predation complicate the social brain hypothesis
van der Bijl, W., & Kolm, N. (2016) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.201500166 · Cited by 36
“Some evidence for larger brains in social carnivores has been presented [10], but the observed link between brain size and sociality was later shown to stem from dogs alone ([18], but see [19]).”
BackgroundIlieş, I., Muscedere, M. L., & Traniello, J. F. A. (2015) · Brain Behavior and Evolution · doi:10.1159/000370100 · Cited by 34
“…Dunbar and Shultz, 2007; Eberhard and Wcislo, 2012; Farris and Roberts, 2005; GómezRobles et al., 2014; Herculano-Houzel, 2012; HerculanoHouzel et al., 2014; Kotrschal et al., 2013; Lefebvre and Sol, 2008; Muscedere et al., 2014; Pérez-Barbería et al., 2007; Reichert, 2009; Swanson et al., 2012].”
BackgroundBrain and Behaviour in Primate Evolution
Dunbar, R. (2009) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02725-3_15 · Cited by 33
Self-citationYamaguchi, N., Kitchener, A. C., Gilissen, E., & Macdonald, D. W. (2009) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2009.01249.x · Cited by 33
Attacked ravens flexibly adjust signalling behaviour according to audience composition
Szipl, G., Ringler, E., & Bugnyar, T. (2018) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2018.0375 · Cited by 32
“Sociality is thought to have driven the evolution of cognitive abilities in primates [1–4] and other mammals (e.g. cetaceans [5], carnivores and ungulates [6]), and possibly also in birds like parrots and corvids [7] (but see [8,9] for an argument against this notion in hyenas).”
Individual memory and the emergence of cooperation
Moreira, J. A. G., Vukov, J., Sousa, C., Santos, F. C., d'Almeida, A. F., Santos, M. D., & Pacheco, J. M. (2012) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.10.030 · Cited by 30
“Indeed, N can vary between 2 and 30 in accord with average maximum population sizes described in several species of primates (Kudo & Dunbar 2001; Dunbar & Shultz 2007a, b; Pérez-Barbería et al. 2007; Shultz & Dunbar 2010).”
BackgroundDeCasien, A. R., González, N. T., Williams, S. A., & Shattuck, M. R. (2018) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/evo.13633 · Cited by 28
Why big brains? A comparison of models for both primate and carnivore brain size evolution
Chambers, H., Heldstab, S. A., & O’Hara, S. J. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0261185 · Cited by 34
“This became the method of choice when brain and body size were found to be tightly coupled allometrically across vertebrates; therefore, accounting for this allometric relationship became of great importance [35, 58].”
Four errors and a fallacy: pitfalls for the unwary in comparative brain analyses
Dunbar, R., & Shultz, S. (2023) · Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · doi:10.1111/brv.12953 · Cited by 30
Self-citationMorphometric Study of Phylogenetic and Ecologic Signals in Procyonid (Mammalia: Carnivora) Endocasts
Ahrens, H. E. (2014) · The Anatomical Record · doi:10.1002/ar.22996 · Cited by 30
Silk, J. B., & Kappeler, P. M. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781107338319.010 · Cited by 28
Hooper, R., Brett, B., & Thornton, A. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0270771 · Cited by 30
Spatial learning and memory in African mole-rats: The role of sociality and sex
Costanzo, M. S., Bennett, N. C., & Lutermann, H. (2008) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.09.008 · Cited by 28
“group size, [43–46]).”
Sociality and communicative complexity: insights from the other insect societies
Nehring, V., & Steiger, S. (2018) · Current Opinion in Insect Science · doi:10.1016/j.cois.2018.04.002 · Cited by 29
Muscedere, M. L., Gronenberg, W., Moreau, C. S., & Traniello, J. F. A. (2014) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.0217 · Cited by 28
Morrison, R. E., Eckardt, W., Stoinski, T. S., & Brent, L. J. N. (2020) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2020.1026 · Cited by 26
Healy, S. D. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199546756.001.0001 · Cited by 30
Fuentes-González, J. A., Housworth, E. A., Weber, A., & Martins, E. P. (2016) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/688917 · Cited by 25
Page, R. A., von Merten, S., & Siemers, B. M. (2012) · Animal Cognition · doi:10.1007/s10071-012-0474-1 · Cited by 25
“Sociality has been connected with cognitive abilities in a variety of taxa (Pérez-Barbería et al. 2007).”
BackgroundLongevity in Bovids Is Promoted by Sociality, But Reduced by Sexual Selection
Bro‐Jørgensen, J. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0045769 · Cited by 22
“and dilution benefits of group living, it is conceivable that the positive link between sociality and longevity is promoted also by a general link between large brain size and sociality [1], which has been reported specifically in ungulates [41,42].”
BackgroundA model for brain life history evolution
González-Forero, M., Faulwasser, T., & Lehmann, L. (2017) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005380 · Cited by 21
Individual Recognition and the Evolution of Learning and Memory in Polistes Paper Wasps
Tibbetts, E. A., & Sheehan, M. J. (2013) · Handbook of behavioral neuroscience · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-415823-8.00042-3 · Cited by 22
Sayol, F., Collado, M. Á., Garcia‐Porta, J., Seid, M. A., Gibbs, J., Agorreta, A., Mauro, D. S., Raemakers, I., Sol, D., & Bartomeus, Í. (2020) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2020.0762 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Pérez-Barbería, F. J., Shultz, S., & Dunbar, R. I. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Liverpool (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Pérez-Barbería, F. Javier
- Shultz, Susanne
- Dunbar, Robin I. M.
- Venue
- Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-12
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2811-2821
- ISSN
- 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-5646
- OpenAlex
- W2105254791
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 16.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Evolution (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- British Academy
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Keywords
- social brain hypothesis, sociality, relative brain size, coevolution, ungulates, carnivores, primates, group cohesion, cognitive demand, brain evolution, evolution of social behavior
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Behavior, Animal, Brain, Carnivora, Mammals, Organ Size, Phylogeny, Primates, Social Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review