Cited by 218Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionBullying, Victimization, and AggressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Rejection sensitivity, social withdrawal, and loneliness in young adults

WATSON, JOHN, NESDALE, DREW·2012·Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Abstract

Rejection sensitivity (RS) has significant negative impacts on individuals' social cognitions, feelings, and interpersonal behaviors. The present research assessed the hypothesis that the effect of RS on young adults' loneliness is mediated by their tendency to withdraw from social contact so as to avoid possible rejection. Participants completed measures of their RS, their tendencies to engage in social withdrawal to avoid rejection, and their loneliness; as well as measures of their social avoidance and distress, self‐esteem, and social self‐efficacy. Results confirmed the main hypothesis and also indicated that RS is positively related to social avoidance and distress, and negatively related to self‐esteem and social self‐efficacy. Implications of the findings for understanding and counteracting RS are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00927.x

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Bierman K. L., 2004, Peer rejection
  3. Brown R., 1995, Prejudice
  4. Derogatis L., 1984, SCL‐90‐R manual. II: Administration, scoring, and procedures
  5. Eysenck H. J., 1964, Manual of the Eysenck Personality Inventory
  6. Kupersmidt J. B., 1990, Peer rejection in childhood: Cambridge studies in social and emotional development, 274
  7. Levy S. R., 2001, Interpersonal rejection, 293
  8. McDougall P., 2001, Interpersonal rejection, 213
  9. Romero‐Canyas R., 2005, The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying, 131
  10. Rubin K., 1998, Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social emotional and personality development, 619
  11. Rubin K. H., 1990, Peer rejection in childhood, 217
  12. Tang T. L., 1987, Effects of self‐esteem and task labels (difficult versus easy) on intrinsic motivation, goal setting, and task performance, Journal of General Psychology, 114, 249
  13. Williams K. D., 2001, Ostracism

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
WATSON, J., & NESDALE, D.
Affiliations
Griffith University (AU)
Corresponding author
NESDALE, DREW
Venue
Journal of Applied Social Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-06-14
Volume
42
Issue
8
Pages
1984-2005
ISSN
  • 0021-9029 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-1816
OpenAlex
W1627460310
Cited by
218
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4
FWCI
7.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
rejection sensitivity, social withdrawal, loneliness, young adults, social avoidance, social distress, self-esteem, social self-efficacy, mediation, interpersonal rejection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review