Cited by 910Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionBullying, Victimization, and AggressionHealth disparities and outcomes

Effects of social exclusion on cognitive processes: Anticipated aloneness reduces intelligent thought.

Baumeister, Roy F., Twenge, Jean M., Nuss, Christopher K.·2002·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Three studies examined the effects of randomly assigned messages of social exclusion. In all 3 studies, significant and large decrements in intelligent thought (including IQ and Graduate Record Examination test performance) were found among people told they were likely to end up alone in life. The decline in cognitive performance was found in complex cognitive tasks such as effortful logic and reasoning; simple information processing remained intact despite the social exclusion. The effects were specific to social exclusion, as participants who received predictions of future nonsocial misfortunes (accidents and injuries) performed well on the cognitive tests. The cognitive impairments appeared to involve reductions in both speed (effort) and accuracy. The effect was not mediated by mood.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.83.4.817

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Experimental induction of thwarted belongingness has been shown to cause many harmful cognitive and behavioral effects, including self-regulatory and executive-function impairments, reduced prosocial behavior, aggression, hostile social-cognitive biases, self-defeating behaviors such as risk-taking, and inner numbness.

    “This experimental manipulation has been shown to cause numerous deleterious effects on cognition and behavior, including self-regulatory impairments”

    From The interpersonal theory of suicide. (2010) · cites this paper as Baumeister, Twenge, & Nuss, 2002

  • Experimental manipulation of social isolation and imagined future isolation cause cognitive and behavioral changes without altering objective isolation.

    “Experimental manipulation of social isolation39 and imagined future isolation40 result in cognitive and behavioral changes even though objective isolation is not altered in these experimental studies.”

    From Social isolation (2011) · cites this paper as [40]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baumeister, R. F., Twenge, J. M., & Nuss, C. K.
Affiliations
Case Western Reserve University (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2002-10
Volume
83
Issue
4
Pages
817-827
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W4238138326
Cited by
910
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 54 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 54 · 2012: 40
FWCI
16.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
social exclusion, cognitive processes, intelligence, social isolation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Analysis of Variance, Cognition, Educational Measurement, Emotions, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Intelligence Tests, Male, Social Isolation, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review