Cited by 193Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesTreatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Executive deficits in major depression

Degl'Innocenti, A., Ågren, H., Bäckman, L.·1998·Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

Abstract

Clinically depressed patients and control subjects were examined by means of different tests to assess executive functions (the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, the Stroop Color Word Test and a test of verbal fluency). The results indicate that the depressed patients were generally slower than the controls, as reflected by longer retrieval times for both words and colours. Furthermore, the depressed patients showed impairment with regard to altering behaviour appropriately in response to feedback. However, there were no depression‐related increases in perseverative responses, and the ability to inhibit irrelevant information was unaffected by depression. No relationship was found between specific depressive symptoms or the severity of depression and cognitive performance. The overall pattern of results suggests that depression may affect various executive functions in a differentiated manner.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1998.tb09985.x

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Unmedicated depressed individuals, including children, adolescents, and adults, perform worse than healthy controls on feature-based selective attention tasks requiring attention to a task-relevant feature while ignoring a distracting feature.

    “Many investigations of color-word reaction times have revealed that unmedicated depressed individuals (including children, adolescents, and adults) perform worse than healthy controls when required to attend to a task-relevant feature (e.g., color) while simultaneously ignoring a distracting feature (e.g., semantic meaning)16–19, including in an international sample of n = 1008 MDD participants”

    From Paying attention to attention in depression (2019) · cites this paper as [19]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Degl'Innocenti, A., Ågren, H., & Bäckman, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Venue
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-03
Volume
97
Issue
3
Pages
182-188
ISSN
  • 0001-690X (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0447
OpenAlex
W2011668290
Cited by
193
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 28 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Vetenskapsrådet
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
major depressive disorder, executive function, cognitive impairment, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, Stroop task, verbal fluency, response inhibition, perseveration, feedback processing, cognitive speed, depression severity
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Attention, Cognition Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Verbal Behavior, Volition, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review