Cited by 158Mental Health Treatment and AccessTreatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Functional disability and depression in the general population. Results from the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS)

Open access
Spijker, J., de Graaf, R., Bijl, R. V., Beekman, A. T. F., Ormel, J., Nolen, W. A.·2004·Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

Abstract

Objective: Data on the temporal relationships between duration of depression and recovery and functional disability are sparse. These relationships were examined in subjects from the general population (n = 250) with newly originated episodes of DSM‐III‐R major depression. Method: The Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study is a prospective epidemiological survey in the adult population (n = 7076), using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). Duration of depression and duration of recovery over 2 years were assessed with a life chart interview. Functional disabilities were assessed with the MOS‐SF‐36 and with absence days from work. Results: Functional disabilities and absence days in depressed individuals were not found to be associated with duration of depression. Functioning in daily activities improved with longer duration of recovery but social functioning not. Conclusion: Functioning deteriorates by actual depressive symptomatology and comorbid anxiety but not by longer duration of depression. After symptomatic recovery, functioning improves to premorbid level, irrespective of the length of the depression. Improvements in daily activities and work can be expected with longer duration of recovery.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2004.00335.x

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The DSM-IV diagnosis of MDD was associated with impairment, psychiatric and substance use disorders, poor health, mortality, disease and economic burden, and disability-years.

    “The DSM-IV diagnosis of MDD was associated with impairment, 3,4 psychiatric and substance use disorders (SUDs), [5][6][7][8][9] poor health, 10,11 mortality, 12 disease and economic burden, 12 and disability-years.[13][14][15][16]”

    From Epidemiology of Adult <i>DSM-5</i> Major Depressive Disorder and Its Specifiers in the United States (2018) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Discussion reports worse functioning during depression and improvement after recovery, supporting the impairment portion of the sentence. However, the Diagnostic instrument section specifies DSM-III-R diagnoses, not the DSM-IV diagnosis named in the claim. The other outcomes are attached to different citations in the citing sentence and are not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Major depression is a frequently occurring, severely disabling, and often recurring mental disorder.

    “Major depression is a commonly occurring, seriously impairing, and often recurrent mental disorder.1, 2”

    From The Costs of Depression (2012) · cites this paper as [1]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Ormel J, Oldehinkel T, Brilman E, van den Brink W. Out- come of depression and anxiety in primary care. A three- wave study of psychopathology and disability. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1993;50:759-766.
  2. Wittchen H-U. Reliability and validity studies of the WHO- CIDI: a critical review. J Psychiatr Res 1994;28:57-84.
  3. Prince MJ, Harwood RH, Thomas A, Mann AH. A pros- pective population-based cohort study of the effects of disablement and social milieu on the onset and mainten- ance of late-life depression. Psychol Med 1998;28:337- 350.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spijker, J., de Graaf, R., Bijl, R. V., Beekman, A. T. F., Ormel, J., & Nolen, W. A.
Affiliations
  • Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek- en Documentatiecentrum (NL)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • University of Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Spijker, J.
Venue
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-07-29
Volume
110
Issue
3
Pages
208-214
ISSN
  • 0001-690X (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0447
OpenAlex
W2153503260
Cited by
158
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
7.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
  • Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
functional disability, depression, depression duration, recovery from depression, major depressive disorder, absenteeism, social functioning, daily activities, anxiety comorbidity, general population, Nemesis
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Major Depressive Disorder, Disability Evaluation, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Population Surveillance, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Cohort Studies, Incidence, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review