Cited by 87Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Social anxiety disorder: what are we losing with the current diagnostic criteria?

Filho, A. S., Hetem, L. A. B., Ferrari, M. C. F., Trzesniak, C., Martín‐Santos, R., Borduqui, T., De Lima Osório, F., Loureiro, S. R. +3 more·2010·Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

Abstract

Filho AS, Hetem LAB, Ferrari MCF, Trzesniak C, Martín‐Santos R, Borduqui T, de Lima Osório F, Loureiro SR, Busatto Filho G, Zuardi AW, Crippa JAS. Social anxiety disorder: what are we losing with the current diagnostic criteria? Objective: To assess the rate of comorbidities and the functional impairment associated with the social anxiety disorder (SAD), with an emphasis on the so‐called subthreshold clinical signs and symptoms. Method: Psychiatric comorbidities and psychosocial functioning were evaluated in 355 volunteers (college students) who had been diagnosed as SAD (n = 141), Subthreshold SAD (n = 92) or Controls (n = 122). Results: The rate of comorbidities was 71.6% in the SAD group and 50% in subjects with Subthreshold SAD, both significantly greater than Controls (28.7%). Concerning psychosocial functioning, the SAD group had higher impairment than the other two groups in all domains evaluated, and subjects with Subthreshold SAD presented intermediate values. Conclusion: The rates of psychiatric comorbidities and the impairment of psychosocial functioning increase progressively along the spectrum of social anxiety. The fact that Subthreshold SAD causes considerable disability and suffering in comparison with control subjects justifies a review of the validity of the diagnostic criteria.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01459.x

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Filho, A. S., Hetem, L. A. B., Ferrari, M. C. F., Trzesniak, C., Martín‐Santos, R., Borduqui, T., De Lima Osório, F., Loureiro, S. R., Busatto Filho, G., Zuardi, A. W., & Crippa, J. A. S.
Affiliations
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (ES)
Corresponding author
Filho, A. S.
Venue
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-02-08
Volume
121
Issue
3
Pages
216-226
ISSN
  • 0001-690X (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0447
OpenAlex
W2063350227
Cited by
87
References
45
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 12
FWCI
13.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scientific Electronic Library Online (São Paulo Research Foundation, Latin American and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
social anxiety disorder, diagnostic criteria, psychiatric comorbidity, functional disability, psychosocial functioning, university students, diagnostic validity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Male, Phobic Disorders, Severity of Illness Index, Social Behavior, Comorbidity, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review