Cited by 169Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Domains of life satisfaction in social anxiety disorder: relation to symptoms and response to cognitive-behavioral therapy

Eng, Winnie, Coles, Meredith E., Heimberg, Richard G., Safren, Steven A.·2005·Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Abstract

A general sense of satisfaction with life has been shown to be discriminable from symptom levels and disability in clinical populations. The current study focused on the utility of identifying domains of life satisfaction in social anxiety disorder and differential changes in these domains following cognitive-behavioral group therapy (CBGT). An exploratory principal axis factor analysis of the items of the Quality of Life Inventory in clients with a principal diagnosis of social anxiety disorder (N=138) yielded four domains of life satisfaction: (1) Achievement, (2) Social Functioning, (3) Personal Growth, and (4) Surroundings. Prior to treatment, clients reported dissatisfaction in the Achievement and Social Functioning domains. Further, levels of satisfaction in these domains were significantly related to severity of social anxiety and depressive symptoms. Finally, analyses of a subsample of clients completing 12-weeks of cognitive-behavioral group therapy revealed significant improvements in the Achievement and Social Functioning factors. These findings provide further support for the assertion that social anxiety disorder has important implications for clients' quality of life and that CBGT can successfully impact several domains of satisfaction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.janxdis.2004.01.007

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eng, W., Coles, M. E., Heimberg, R. G., & Safren, S. A.
Affiliations
  • College of Staten Island (US)
  • Binghamton University (US)
  • Adult Anxiety Clinic of Temple (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Heimberg, Richard G.
Venue
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
143-156
ISSN
0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1975359390
Cited by
168
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (44119)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
social anxiety disorder, life satisfaction, quality of life, group cognitive behavioral therapy, treatment response, achievement, social functioning, personal growth, depressive symptoms, Quality of Life Inventory
MeSH terms
Achievement, Adult, Depression, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Personal Satisfaction, Phobic Disorders, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Social Behavior, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review