Cited by 311Indoor Air Quality and Microbial ExposureEducational Environments and Student OutcomesBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization

Association between substandard classroom ventilation rates and students’ academic achievement

Open access
Haverinen-Shaughnessy, U., Moschandreas, D. J., Shaughnessy, R. J.·2011·Indoor Air

Abstract

UNLABELLED: This study focuses on the relationship between classroom ventilation rates and academic achievement. One hundred elementary schools of two school districts in the southwest United States were included in the study. Ventilation rates were estimated from fifth-grade classrooms (one per school) using CO(2) concentrations measured during occupied school days. In addition, standardized test scores and background data related to students in the classrooms studied were obtained from the districts. Of 100 classrooms, 87 had ventilation rates below recommended guidelines based on ASHRAE Standard 62 as of 2004. There is a linear association between classroom ventilation rates and students' academic achievement within the range of 0.9-7.1 l/s per person. For every unit (1 l/s per person) increase in the ventilation rate within that range, the proportion of students passing standardized test (i.e., scoring satisfactory or above) is expected to increase by 2.9% (95%CI 0.9-4.8%) for math and 2.7% (0.5-4.9%) for reading. The linear relationship observed may level off or change direction with higher ventilation rates, but given the limited number of observations, we were unable to test this hypothesis. A larger sample size is needed for estimating the effect of classroom ventilation rates higher than 7.1 l/s per person on academic achievement. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The results of this study suggest that increasing the ventilation rates toward recommended guideline ventilation rates in classrooms should translate into improved academic achievement of students. More studies are needed to fully understand the relationships between ventilation rate, other indoor environmental quality parameters, and their effects on students' health and achievement. Achieving the recommended guidelines and pursuing better understanding of the underlying relationships would ultimately support both sustainable and productive school environments for students and personnel.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2010.00686.x

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 87% of classrooms in one hundred elementary schools in the southwest of the U.S. had air quality problems.

    “Haverinen-Shaughnessy et al. [20] investigated one hundred elementary schools in the southwest of the U.S. and found that 87% of the classrooms had air quality problems.”

    From Investigation of Indoor Air Quality and the Identification of Influential Factors at Primary Schools in the North of China (2017) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Introduction reports 100 elementary schools in the southwestern United States and says 87 of the 100 classrooms had ventilation rates below recommended guidelines. That supports a specific ventilation problem, but the broader description “air quality problems” is not established by the reported finding. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [27]27. Shaughnessy, R., Haverinen-Shaughnessy, U., Nevalainen, A. and Moschandreas, D. (2007) Indoor environmental quality in schools and academic performance of students: studies from 2004 to present. In: Proceedings of ASHRAE IAQ Healthy and Sustainable Buildings, Baltimore, USA.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haverinen-Shaughnessy, U., Moschandreas, D. J., & Shaughnessy, R. J.
Affiliations
  • Illinois Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of Tulsa (US)
Corresponding author
Shaughnessy, R. J.
Venue
Indoor Air
Published
2010-10-28
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
121-131
ISSN
0905-6947 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2162103866
Cited by
311
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 10
FWCI
7.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Indoor Air (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • STM:n Hallinnonalan avoin julkaisuarkisto (Julkari) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
  • Academy of Finland
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Keywords
academic performance, CO2 concentration, elementary school classrooms, ASHRAE Standard 62.2, indoor air quality, standardized test scores, school indoor environment
MeSH terms
Carbon Dioxide, Educational Measurement, Educational Status, Humans, Mathematics, Reading, Schools, Students, Ventilation, Southwestern United States, Linear Models, Air Pollution, Indoor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review