Cited by 83Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesStress Responses and CortisolGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Gene-environment interactions between CRHR1 variants and physical assault in suicide attempts

Open access
Ben-Efraim, Y. J., Wasserman, D., Wasserman, J., Sokolowski, M.·2011·Genes, Brain and Behavior

Abstract

Risk factors for suicidal behaviors are partly heritable, including genetic variants that drive diathesis-stress in addition to, or by interaction with, exposure to certain stressful life events (SLEs). Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis regulatory genes are candidates for association with suicide as well as its endophenotypes. Using a family-based design of offspring who attempted suicide (SA) and both parents, we investigated gene-environment interactions (G×Es) of SLE exposures with single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor-1 (CRHR1), a major HPA axis regulatory gene. We observed a novel G×E among predominantly female SA between 5'-SNP rs7209436 and childhood/adolescence physical assault or attack (PA), as well as a second novel and male-specific G×E between 3'-SNP rs16940665 and adulthood PA exposure. A third male-specific G×E previously reported by us among depressed SA, between SNP rs4792887 and cumulative SLEs, was also further confirmed. The two novel G×Es presented here shared the SA characteristic of aggression, while showing differences on other aspects of SA heterogeneity. We conclude that different SA subjects were observed to differentially associate with two novel G×Es involving exposures to PA with different life timing and SNPs located in opposite ends of CRHR1. Concerning sex differences, we observed three subsets of distinct male SA that associated with each of the three observed G×Es, whereas female SAs were affected by only one of the G×Es. These results are consistent with a diathesis-stress model of suicidal behavior and may help to explain SA heterogeneity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1601-183x.2011.00703.x

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Specific CRHR1 polymorphisms interact with ELS/CT to increase the risk of suicide attempts.

    “Bradley et al. reported in two separate cohorts, independently, that specific CRHR1 polymorphisms interact with ELS/CT to increase the risk of adult depression (390), similar to Heim et al. (391), while Ben-Efraim et al. (392) reported comparable findings with respect to suicide attempts.”

    From Developmental Trajectories of Early Life Stress and Trauma: A Narrative Review on Neurobiological Aspects Beyond Stress System Dysregulation (2019) · cites this paper as [392]

    The Abstract and the section ‘Identification of two novel G×Es on SA outcome’ report an interaction between CRHR1 rs7209436 and physical assault before age 18 in female suicide attempters. This supports a childhood-adversity interaction, but the paper does not establish that multiple polymorphisms interact with ELS/CT broadly to increase suicide-attempt risk: its other reported interactions concern adult assault or cumulative lifetime stress, and the rs7209436 minor allele had a protective effect. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ben-Efraim, Y. J., Wasserman, D., Wasserman, J., & Sokolowski, M.
Affiliations
Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Sokolowski, M.
Venue
Genes, Brain and Behavior
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-06-09
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
663-672
ISSN
  • 1601-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1601-1848
OpenAlex
W2049406343
Cited by
83
References
58
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genes Brain & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Foundation for Suicide Prevention
  • Marcus och Amalia Wallenbergs minnesfond
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
suicide attempts, gene-environment interaction, CRHR1, corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor 1, physical assault, life events, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, diathesis-stress model, single nucleotide polymorphisms, sex differences, aggression, family-based association
MeSH terms
CRF Receptor, Type 1, Adolescent, Adult, Aggression, Depression, Female, Haplotypes, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Personality, Polymorphism, Genetic, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Suicide, Attempted, Violence, Receptors, Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Gene-Environment Interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review