Cited by 765Family Dynamics and RelationshipsGender, Labor, and Family DynamicsIntergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 100 of the 101 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Re‐theorizing Family Demographics

Open access
Esping‐Andersen, Gøsta, Billari, Francesco C.·2015·Population and Development Review

Abstract

Two dominant theories within family research foresee a long‐term decline in marriage, fertility, and partner stability. They also assume that this “less‐family” scenario will be spearheaded by higher‐educated strata. Trends in the latter half of the twentieth century seemed to provide ample support for both predictions. However, recent signs of change in family behavior raise doubts about their continued validity. In a number of countries we see a halt to, and even reversal of, fertility decline and of couple instability. In parallel, we observe a reversal of the social gradient on both dimensions. Applying a multiple equilibrium framework, we propose a theoretical framework that helps explain both the phase of marital and fertility decline and the subsequent recovery. We focus especially on the endogenous dynamics of the process, which, we argue, depend on the conditions that favor rapid diffusion. Our core argument is that the turnaround is driven by the diffusion of gender‐egalitarian norms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00024.x

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 101 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Becker Gary S., 1981, A Treatise on the Family
  2. 10.1177/000312249906400302 · DOI
  3. Creighton Mathew, 2013, The Low Fertility Syndrome
  4. Ellwood David T., 2004, Social Inequality, 3
  5. Esping‐Andersen Gøsta., 2009, The Incomplete Revolution: Adapting Welfare States to Women's New Roles
  6. Goode William J., 1962, Marital satisfaction and instability: A cross‐cultural class analysis of divorce rates, International Social Science Journal, 14, 544
  7. Gornick Janet C., 1998, Public policy and the employment of mothers: A cross‐national study, Social Sciences Quarterly, 79, 35
  8. Hazan Moshe, 2011, CEPR Discussion Paper 8590
  9. Jäntti Markus, 2006, IZA Discussion Paper No. 1938
  10. Neyer Gerda, 2011, Stockholm Research Reports in Demography, 9
  11. Raymo James M., 2012, CDE Working Paper No. 2012–01
  12. Scott J., 2006, Globalization, Value Changes and Generations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 601–700 of 765

Metadata

Authors
Esping‐Andersen, G., & Billari, F. C.
Affiliations
  • Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
Population and Development Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-03
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
1-31
ISSN
  • 0098-7921 (ISSN-L)
  • 1728-4457
OpenAlex
W2026143456
Cited by
763
References
101
Citations by year
2026: 59 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 83 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 93 · 2019: 69 · 2018: 67 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 10
FWCI
143.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Population and Development Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della Ricerca - Bocconi (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
Keywords
family demographics, fertility decline, marriage decline, social gradient, norm diffusion, fertility restoration, endogenous dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review