The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
FORMAL AND INFORMAL MENTORSHIPS: A COMPARISON ON MENTORING FUNCTIONS AND CONTRAST WITH NONMENTORED COUNTERPARTS
Abstract
Research on mentorships has suffered from fragmentation of key issues; specifically, type of mentoring relationship, functions served by the mentor, and outcomes of the mentoring relationship. A field study was conducted comparing 212 protégés who were involved in informally developed mentorships, 53 protégés involved in formal mentor‐ship programs, and 284 individuals who did not have mentors. Individuals in informal and formal mentorships were compared along two mentoring dimensions: psychosocial and career‐related functions. All groups were compared on three outcome measures: organizational socialization, job satisfaction, and salary. Results indicated protégés in informal mentorships reported more career‐related support from their mentors and higher salaries than protégés in formal mentorships. For all outcome variables, protégés in informal mentorships also reported more favorable outcomes than nonmentored individuals. However, outcomes from protégés in formal mentorships were generally not significant from the other two groups. Implications for mentorship practices and research are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mentoring at Work: Developmental Relationships in Organizational Life.
Arthur, M. B., & Kram, K. E. (1985) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392687 · Cited by 2,670
Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire.
Weiss, D. J., Dawis, R. V., & England, G. W. (1967) · Cited by 2,535
Phases of the Mentor Relationship.
Kram, K. E. (1983) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/255910 · Cited by 2,059
AN INVESTIGATION OF THE DETERMINANTS OF SUCCESSFUL ASSIGNED MENTORING RELATIONSHIPS
NOE, R. A. (1988) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb00638.x · Cited by 1,212
Dreher, G. F., & Ash, R. A. (1990) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.75.5.539 · Cited by 970
Mentorship: A Career Training and Development Tool
Hunt, D. M., & Michael, C. (1983) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257836 · Cited by 795
The mentor advantage: Perceived career/job experiences of proteges versus non‐proteges
Fagenson, E. A. (1989) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.4030100403 · Cited by 604
Career Development in Organizations.
Ritti, R. R., & Hall, D. T. (1987) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392926 · Cited by 513
Whitely, W., Dougherty, T. W., & Dreher, G. F. (1991) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256445 · Cited by 511
Zey, M. G. (2020) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429339134 · Cited by 311
Cited by
PREDICTORS OF OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECTIVE CAREER SUCCESS: A META‐ANALYSIS
NG, T. W. H., EBY, L. T., SORENSEN, K. L., & FELDMAN, D. C. (2005) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00515.x · Cited by 2,412
Day, D. V. (2000) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(00)00061-8 · Cited by 2,180
WHAT DO PROACTIVE PEOPLE DO? A LONGITUDINAL MODEL LINKING PROACTIVE PERSONALITY AND CAREER SUCCESS
SEIBERT, S. E., KRAIMER, M. L., & CRANT, J. M. (2001) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00234.x · Cited by 1,649
Mentoring College Students: A Critical Review of the Literature Between 1990 and 2007
Crisp, G., & Cruz, I. (2009) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s11162-009-9130-2 · Cited by 1,087
Eby, L. T., Allen, T. D., Evans, S. C., Ng, T., & DuBois, D. L. (2008) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2007.04.005 · Cited by 1,046
Metadata
- Authors
- CHAO, G. T., WALZ, P., & GARDNER, P. D.
- Venue
- Personnel Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-09
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 619-636
- ISSN
- 0031-5826 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-6570
- OpenAlex
- W2006767851
- Cited by
- 1,073
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 12.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: FORMAL AND INFORMAL MENTORSHIPS: A COMPARISON ON MENTORING FUNCTIONS AND CONTRAST WITH NONMENTORED COUNTERPARTS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1992.tb00863.x
- The paper
- CHAO, G. T., WALZ, P., & GARDNER, P. D. (1992). FORMAL AND INFORMAL MENTORSHIPS: A COMPARISON ON MENTORING FUNCTIONS AND CONTRAST WITH NONMENTORED COUNTERPARTS. Personnel Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1992.tb00863.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.