Cited by 637Emotions and Moral BehaviorSocial and Intergroup PsychologyAction Observation and Synchronization

Relation of sympathy and personal distress to prosocial behavior: A multimethod study.

Eisenberg, Nancy, Fabes, Richard A., Miller, Paul A., Fultz, Jim, Shell, Rita, Mathy, Robin M., Reno, Ray R.·1989·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Assessed sympathy and personal distress with facial and physiological indexes (heart rate) as well as self-report indexes and examined the relations of these various indexes to prosocial behavior for children and adults in an easy escape condition. Heart rate deceleration during exposure to the needy others was associated with increased willingness to help. In addition, adults' reports of sympathy, as well as facial sadness and concerned attention, were positively related to their intention to assist. For children, there was some indication that report of positive affect and facial distress were negatively related to prosocial intentions and behavior, whereas facial concern was positively related to the indexes of prosocial behavior. These findings are interpreted as providing additional, convergent support for the notion that sympathy and personal distress are differentially related to prosocial behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.57.1.55

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Appreciation of another's distress without experiencing overwhelming emotional distress is conducive to pro-social behavior.

    “In contrast, appreciation of another’s distress without experiencing overwhelming emotional distress is conducive to pro-social behavior (3).”

    From Empathy and pro-social behavior in rats (2011) · cites this paper as [3]

  • Intense sharing of another's pain can be a primary cause for empathic distress and decreased helping behavior.

    “intense sharing of the other's pain can be a primary cause for empathic distress and decreased helping behavior (Batson et al., 1987;Eisenberg et al., 1989).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., Miller, P. A., Fultz, J., Shell, R., Mathy, R. M., & Reno, R. R.
Affiliations
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • Nanjing University (CN)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1989
Volume
57
Issue
1
Pages
55-66
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W1985748704
Cited by
637
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 24
FWCI
19.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (1 F32 MH0926301-01, 1 F32 MH081818-01)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K04HD000717)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
sympathy, personal distress, prosocial behavior, helping behavior, heart rate, facial expressions, prosocial intentions, children, adults, multimethod assessment
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Altruism, Arousal, Child, Empathy, Female, Helping Behavior, Humans, Individuality, Male, Motivation, Personality Development, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review