Cited by 48Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPerfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

“What If I Make a Mistake?”: Intolerance of Uncertainty Is Associated With Poor Behavioral Performance

Thibodeau, Michel A., Carleton, R. Nicholas, Gómez-Pérez, Lydia, Asmundson, Gordon J.G.·2013·Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease

Abstract

Intolerance of uncertainty (IU) has been posited as ubiquitous across experiences of anxiety; however, studies testing how IU impacts behavior remain scant. The current study examined the impact of IU on performance during a keyboard typing task, a relatively complex and common behavior. A total of 40 members of the university community completed the task and measures of IU, trait anxiety, negative affect, and state anxiety. Heart rate and skin conductance were also assessed during the task as indices of state anxiety. IU was independently and substantially associated with slower typing speed (part r = -0.68) beyond other measured psychological and physiological variables but was not associated with typing errors. Prospective and inhibitory IU, as manifestations of IU, did not seemingly differ in their relationship with performance. IU may negatively impact day-to-day behaviors and contribute to undesired consequences. Further research is needed to explore whether this relationship warrants consideration in models of anxiety disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/nmd.0b013e3182a21298

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Prospective IU subscale seems to be more related to GAD and OCD symptoms, while Inhibitory IU is more associated with symptoms of social phobia, panic disorder, PTSD, and depression.

    “For example, the Prospective IU subscale seems to be more related to GAD and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) symptoms, while Inhibitory IU is more associated with symptoms of social phobia, panic disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and depression. 10,11,14,15”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thibodeau, M. A., Carleton, R. N., Gómez-Pérez, L., & Asmundson, G. J. G.
Affiliations
University of Regina (CA)
Venue
Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease
Published
2013-09
Volume
201
Issue
9
Pages
760-766
ISSN
0022-3018 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2073875405
Cited by
48
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
4.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (113434)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
intolerance of uncertainty, typing speed, inhibitory intolerance of uncertainty, trait anxiety, state anxiety, negative affect, heart rate, skin conductance, anxiety disorders
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Arousal, Female, Galvanic Skin Response, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychomotor Performance, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reaction Time, Self-Assessment, Uncertainty, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review