The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Current trends in microsatellite genotyping
Abstract
Microsatellites have been popular molecular markers ever since their advent in the late eighties. Despite growing competition from new genotyping and sequencing techniques, the use of these versatile and cost‐effective markers continues to increase, boosted by successive technical advances. First, methods for multiplexing PCR have considerably improved over the last years, thereby decreasing genotyping costs and increasing throughput. Second, next‐generation sequencing technologies allow the identification of large numbers of microsatellite loci at reduced cost in non‐model species. As a consequence, more stringent selection of loci is possible, thereby further enhancing multiplex quality and efficiency. However, current practices are lagging behind. By surveying recently published population genetic studies relying on simple sequence repeats, we show that more than half of the studies lack appropriate quality controls and do not make use of multiplex PCR. To make the most of the latest technical developments, we outline the need for a well‐established strategy including standardized high‐throughput bench protocols and specific bioinformatic tools, from primer design to allele calling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Waits, L. P., Luikart, G., & Taberlet, P. (2001) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2001.01185.x · Cited by 1,437
SNPs in ecology, evolution and conservation
Morin, P. A., Luikart, G., Wayne, R. K., & the SNP workshop group (2004) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.01.009 · Cited by 1,080
Multiplex PCR: Optimization and Application in Diagnostic Virology
Elnifro, E. M., Ashshi, A. M., Cooper, R. J., & Klapper, P. E. (2000) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.13.4.559-570.2000 · Cited by 964
Parchman, T. L., Geist, K. S., Grahnen, J. A., Benkman, C. W., & Buerkle, C. A. (2010) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-11-180 · Cited by 446
Prospects for inferring pairwise relationships with single nucleotide polymorphisms
Glaubitz, J. C., Rhodes, O. E., & Dewoody, J. A. (2003) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2003.01790.x · Cited by 136
Cited by
Genomic Encryption of Digital Data Stored in Synthetic DNA
Grass, R. N., Heckel, R., Dessimoz, C., & Stark, W. J. (2020) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202001162 · Cited by 34
Liljegren, M. M., de Muinck, E. J., & Trosvik, P. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0159232 · Cited by 16
Population genetics of Bull Trout ( Salvelinus confluentus ) in the upper Athabasca River basin
Carroll, E. K. T., & Vamosi, S. M. (2021) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.8110 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- GUICHOUX, E., LAGACHE, L., WAGNER, S., CHAUMEIL, P., LÉGER, P., LEPAIS, O., LEPOITTEVIN, C., MALAUSA, T., REVARDEL, E., SALIN, F., & PETIT, R. J.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology Resources
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-05-12
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 591-611
- ISSN
- 1755-098X (ISSN-L)
- 1755-0998
- OpenAlex
- W1956276071
- Cited by
- 937
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 35.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.