Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 937

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Current trends in microsatellite genotyping

GUICHOUX, E., LAGACHE, L., WAGNER, S., CHAUMEIL, P., LÉGER, P., LEPAIS, O., LEPOITTEVIN, C., MALAUSA, T., REVARDEL, E., SALIN, F., PETIT, R.J.·2011·Molecular Ecology Resources

Abstract

Microsatellites have been popular molecular markers ever since their advent in the late eighties. Despite growing competition from new genotyping and sequencing techniques, the use of these versatile and cost‐effective markers continues to increase, boosted by successive technical advances. First, methods for multiplexing PCR have considerably improved over the last years, thereby decreasing genotyping costs and increasing throughput. Second, next‐generation sequencing technologies allow the identification of large numbers of microsatellite loci at reduced cost in non‐model species. As a consequence, more stringent selection of loci is possible, thereby further enhancing multiplex quality and efficiency. However, current practices are lagging behind. By surveying recently published population genetic studies relying on simple sequence repeats, we show that more than half of the studies lack appropriate quality controls and do not make use of multiplex PCR. To make the most of the latest technical developments, we outline the need for a well‐established strategy including standardized high‐throughput bench protocols and specific bioinformatic tools, from primer design to allele calling.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03014.x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 937

Metadata

Authors
GUICHOUX, E., LAGACHE, L., WAGNER, S., CHAUMEIL, P., LÉGER, P., LEPAIS, O., LEPOITTEVIN, C., MALAUSA, T., REVARDEL, E., SALIN, F., & PETIT, R. J.
Venue
Molecular Ecology Resources
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-05-12
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
591-611
ISSN
  • 1755-098X (ISSN-L)
  • 1755-0998
OpenAlex
W1956276071
Cited by
937
References
5
FWCI
35.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.