Cited by 46Neurological Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsNeurological Disorders and TreatmentsAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Neuroprotective Effects of Vinpocetine and its Major Metabolite Cis‐apovincaminic Acid on NMDA‐Induced Neurotoxicity in a Rat Entorhinal Cortex Lesion Model

Open access
Nyakas, Csaba, Felszeghy, Klára, Szabó, Róbert, Keijser, Jan N., Luiten, Paul G.M., Szombathelyi, Zsolt, Tihanyi, Károly·2009·CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics

Abstract

Vinpocetine (ethyl-apovincaminate, Cavinton), a synthetic derivative of the Vinca minor alkaloid vincamine, has been used now for decades for prevention and treatment of cerebrovascular diseases predisposing to development of dementia. Both vinpocetine and its main metabolite cis-apovincaminic acid (cAVA) exert a neuroprotective type of action. Bilateral N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-induced neurodegeneration in the entorhinal cortex of rat was used as a dementia model to confirm the neuroprotective action of these compounds in vivo. NMDA-lesioned rats were treated 60 min before lesion and throughout 3 postoperative days with a 10 mg/kg intraperitoneal dose of vinpocetine or cAVA. Behavioral tests started after termination of drug treatment and consisted of novel object recognition, social discrimination, and spontaneous alternation in a Y-maze, and spatial learning in the Morris water maze. At the end of behavioral testing brains were perfused with fixative and the size of the excitotoxic neuronal lesion and that of microglial activation around the lesion were assayed quantitatively on brain sections immunostained for neuron-specific nuclear protein (NeuN) and integrin CD11b, respectively. Entorhinal NMDA lesions impaired recognition of novel objects and the new social partner, and suppressed spontaneous alternation and spatial learning performance in the Morris maze. Both vinpocetine and cAVA effectively attenuated the behavioral deficits, and significantly decreased lesion size and the region of microglia activation. Both lesion-induced attention deficit and learning disabilities were markedly alleviated by vinpocetine and cAVA. The morphological findings corroborated the behavioral observations and indicated reduced lesion size and microglia activation especially after vinpocetine treatment which supports an in vivo neuroprotective mode of action of vinpocitine and a less potent action of cAVA.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1755-5949.2009.00078.x

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [12]12. Eijkenboom M, Blokland A, Van Der Staay FJ. Modelling cognitive dysfunctions by bilateral lesions of the entorhinal cortex in the rat. Neuroscience 1999;101:27–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. [44]44. Van Rossum D, Hanisch UK. Microglia. Metab Brain Dis 2004;19:393–411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nyakas, C., Felszeghy, K., Szabó, R., Keijser, J. N., Luiten, P. G. M., Szombathelyi, Z., & Tihanyi, K.
Affiliations
  • Semmelweis University (HU)
  • University of Groningen (NL)
  • Gedeon Richter (Hungary) (HU)
Corresponding author
Nyakas, Csaba
Venue
CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-05-06
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
89-99
ISSN
  • 1755-5930 (ISSN-L)
  • 1755-5949
OpenAlex
W2054843695
Cited by
46
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Gedeon Richter
  • Hungarian Scientific Research Fund
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
vinpocetine, NMDA neurotoxicity, entorhinal cortex lesion, neuroprotection, dementia model, microglial activation, spatial learning impairment, novel object recognition, social discrimination, spontaneous alternation, vinca alkaloids, CD11b
MeSH terms
Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Male, Vinca Alkaloids, N-Methylaspartate, Rats, Wistar, Neuroprotective Agents, Entorhinal Cortex, Maze Learning, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review