Cited by 112International Business and FDIInnovation and Knowledge ManagementInternational Student and Expatriate Challenges

How Good are Multinationality–Performance ( M‐P ) Empirical Studies?

Verbeke, Alain, Forootan, M. Zaman·2012·Global Strategy Journal

Abstract

We critically evaluate strong views in the scholarly literature that suggest a linkage between multinationality ( M ) and performance ( P ). Building upon this critical analysis, we propose a new M‐P conceptual approach as well as a testing framework, consisting of 12 subtests, to assess the quality of the M‐P empirical literature to date. We observe that many of the most cited studies were poorly conceived and simply cannot lead to reasonable conclusions on possible M‐P linkages. The single most important flaw is the neglect of the multinational enterprise's firm‐specific advantages as the main driving force behind internationalization strategies and related effects on performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.2042-5805.2012.01040.x

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The bulk of studies claiming a positive relationship between multinationality and performance suffer from conceptual and empirical flaws.

    “Verbeke and Forootan (2012) have shown that most research on alleged positive linkages between firm-level level multinationality (or level of global diversification) and performance is flawed, both conceptually and empirically.”

    From The future of international business research on corporate globalization that never was… (2018) · cites this paper as Verbeke & Forootan, 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Verbeke, A., & Forootan, M. Z.
Affiliations
University of Calgary (CA)
Corresponding author
Verbeke, Alain
Venue
Global Strategy Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-11
Volume
2
Issue
4
Pages
332-344
ISSN
  • 2042-5791 (ISSN-L)
  • 2042-5805
OpenAlex
W1589940047
Cited by
112
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
16.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Global Strategy Journal (publishedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Business and FDI
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Communication › International Student and Expatriate Challenges
Keywords
multinational corporations, firm-specific advantages, internationalization strategy, firm performance, research quality assessment, test framework

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review