The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Groups as problem‐solving units: Toward a new meaning of social cognition
Abstract
In this paper we take the position that cognition can be meaningfully understood at the group level of analysis. We refer to group‐level cognitive activity as social cognition, a term that we apply collectively to those social processes involved in the acquisition, storage, transmission, manipulation and use of information for the purpose of creating a group‐level intellective product. In this context, the word ‘social’ is used to denote how cognition is accomplished, not its content. It is proposed that at least some social cognition occurs in every kind of group problem‐solving situation, though the amount and type depends on the specific problem‐solving functions that need to be addressed in order to reach a problem solution. We examine a number of these functions, and consider how they are served by various group member actions. This analysis is informed (though not determined) by certain functional analogies that can be found between individual‐level and group‐level (i.e. social) cognition. The benefits of adopting a functional orientation to understanding group problem solving are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Coordinating Expertise in Software Development Teams
Faraj, S., & Sproull, L. (2000) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.12.1554.12072 · Cited by 1,689
Team Mental Model: Construct or Metaphor?
Klimoski, R., & Mohammed, S. (1994) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639402000206 · Cited by 1,632
The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors.
Hinsz, V. B., Tindale, R. S., & Vollrath, D. A. (1997) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.43 · Cited by 1,428
Motivated Information Processing in Group Judgment and Decision Making
De Dreu, C. K. W., Nijstad, B. A., & van Knippenberg, D. (2008) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868307304092 · Cited by 754
Somech, A. (2006) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206305277799 · Cited by 563
Recognizing and Utilizing Expertise in Work Groups: A Status Characteristics Perspective
Bunderson, J. S. (2003) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3556637 · Cited by 527
van Dijk, H., van Engen, M. L., & van Knippenberg, D. (2012) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.06.003 · Cited by 514
A Framework for Teachable Collaborative Problem Solving Skills
Hesse, F., Care, E., Buder, J., Sassenberg, K., & Griffin, P. (2015) · Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9395-7_2 · Cited by 507
Distribution of Knowledge, Group Network Structure, and Group Performance
Rulke, D. L., & Galaskiewicz, J. (2000) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.5.612.12052 · Cited by 364
Discussion of shared and unshared information in decision-making groups.
Larson, J. R., Foster-Fishman, P. G., & Keys, C. B. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.446 · Cited by 319
Self-citationFrom causes to conditions in group research
Hackman, J. R. (2012) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.1774 · Cited by 232
Measuring team knowledge: A window to the cognitive underpinnings of team performance.
Cooke, N. J., Kiekel, P. A., Salas, E., Stout, R., Bowers, C., & Cannon-Bowers, J. (2003) · Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice · doi:10.1037/1089-2699.7.3.179 · Cited by 228
The cultural evolution of emergent group-level traits
Smaldino, P. E. (2014) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x13001544 · Cited by 211
Hou, C., Zhu, G., Sudarshan, V., Lim, F. S., & Ong, Y. S. (2025) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105329 · Cited by 70
Collective choice, collaboration, and communication
Stasser, G., & Abele, S. (2020) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103211 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Larson, J. R., & Christensen, C.
- Venue
- British Journal of Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-03
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-30
- ISSN
- 0144-6665 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8309
- OpenAlex
- W2013309107
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
