Cited by 25Nursing education and managementHealth Policy Implementation ScienceHealthcare Quality and Management

Embedding compassionate care in local NHS practice: developing a conceptual model through realistic evaluation

Open access
MacArthur, Juliet, Wilkinson, Heather, Gray, Morag A, Matthews-Smith, Gerri·2017·Journal of Research in Nursing

Abstract

The aim of this study was to critically analyse the impact of the ‘Leadership in Compassionate Care Programme’ and offer a conceptual model of factors that can embed compassionate care in contemporary health care environments. This three-year initiative (2008–2011) was designed to embed compassionate care in both practice and pre-registration education. Using a realistic evaluation approach this longitudinal qualitative study involved data collection in eight participating wards. The ‘level of adoption’ of the Programme varied across the wards, which pointed to key context and mechanisms that were influential in embedding compassionate care. Contextual factors that promoted adoption of the Programme were stability, support and leadership. The most important mechanisms were appreciative inquiry coupled with skilled facilitation. Powerful practice development techniques focused on articulating and demonstrating values; giving patients, relatives and staff a voice to express their experiences and emotions; and instituting effective feedback mechanisms. In the high adopting wards the main outcomes included personalisation of patient care, an increased sense of involvement for relatives and ‘caring conversations’ becoming an accepted part of working practice. Embedding and sustaining compassionate care demands strategic vision and investment in a local infrastructure that supports relationship-centred care, practice development and effective leadership at all levels.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1744987116678901

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MacArthur et al. (2017) generated a dynamic, practice-based model for strengthening organisational capacity for compassionate care.

    “Generated a dynamic, practice-based model for strengthening organisational capacity for compassionate care”

    From Whither compassionate leadership? A systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as MacArthur et al. (2017)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MacArthur, J., Wilkinson, H., Gray, M. A., & Matthews-Smith, G.
Affiliations
  • NHS Lothian (GB)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • Senior Lecturer, The Business School, Edinburgh Napier University, UK
Corresponding author
MacArthur, Juliet
Venue
Journal of Research in Nursing
Published
2016-12-19
Volume
22
Issue
1-2
Pages
130-147
ISSN
  • 1361-4096 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-9871
  • 1744-988X
OpenAlex
W2593746764
Cited by
25
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
5.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Journal of research in nursing (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
Keywords
compassionate care, appreciative inquiry, practice development, leadership, relationship-centered care, family involvement, pre-registration education, feedback mechanisms, contextual factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review