Cited by 73Behavioral Health and InterventionsMedia Influence and HealthPsychology of Social Influence

How negative descriptive norms for healthy eating undermine the effects of positive injunctive norms

Staunton, Mina, Louis, Winnifred R., Smith, Joanne R., Terry, Deborah J., McDonald, Rachel I.·2014·Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Abstract

Healthy eating intentions were assessed as a function of theory of planned behavior variables and manipulated group norm salience. Participants ( n = 119) were exposed (or not) to a positive injunctive norm that their fellow students approve of eating healthily, and (or not) to a negative descriptive norm that their fellow students do not eat healthily. A significant interaction emerged. When a negative descriptive norm was made salient, participants exposed to a positive injunctive norm reported significantly lower intentions to eat healthily. When no descriptive norm was given, exposure to a positive injunctive norm had no effect. The results suggest the weakness of manipulated injunctive norm salience in the health domain, and the importance of investigating the interactive effects of referent group norms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jasp.12223

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Staunton et al. found that students told most peers do not eat healthily reported lower intentions to eat healthily than controls.

    “students told that most of their peers do not eat healthily (but think that people should do so) subsequently reported significantly lower intentions to eat healthily themselves compared to controls (Staunton et al. [2014]).”

    From Science Communication and the Problematic Impact of Descriptive Norms (2023) · cites this paper as Staunton et al. [2014]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Staunton, M., Louis, W. R., Smith, J. R., Terry, D. J., & McDonald, R. I.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
Corresponding author
Louis, Winnifred R.
Venue
Journal of Applied Social Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-01-26
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
319-330
ISSN
  • 0021-9029 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-1816
OpenAlex
W1920405066
Cited by
73
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
FWCI
8.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (acceptedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Research Council (DP0877146)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychology of Social Influence
Keywords
healthy eating, descriptive norms, injunctive norms, theory of planned behavior, eating intentions, norm salience, reference groups, social influence, health behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review